World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Agnes Moors

Agnes Moors

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
10692
World Ranking
9676
National Ranking
138

Agnes Moors publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnes Moors sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Agnes Moors D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnes Moors sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Agnes Moors is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and focuses their research primarily within the field of Psychology, with 55 publications. Their work spans several subfields, notably Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology, and General Decision Sciences.

Their research covers a range of main topics including Mental Health Research Topics, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Emotions and Moral Behavior, Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Cultural Differences and Values, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies.

Among recent publications, key papers authored or coauthored by Agnes Moors include:

  • The rise of affectivism, 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Comparison of the determinants for positive and negative affect proposed by appraisal theories, goal-directed theories, and predictive processing theories, 2021, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • A goal-directed account of action slips: The reliance on old contingencies., 2022, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Tackling fear: Beyond associative memory activation as the only determinant of fear responding, 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Neurophysiological evidence for evaluative feedback processing depending on goal relevance, 2020, NeuroImage

Their frequent coauthors include Massimo Köster, Eike Kofi Buabang, Yannick Boddez, Jan De Houwer, and Maja Fischer.

Agnes Moors has published in several venues repeatedly, reflecting a consistent engagement in certain journals. These include Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Motivation Science, Cognition & Emotion, Collabra Psychology, and Current Addiction Reports.

Additionally, Agnes Moors has contributed to book publications, notably with Cambridge University Press, with a book titled Demystifying Emotions published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Automaticity: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis.

    Agnes Moors;Jan De Houwer

  • Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development

    Agnes Moors;Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Klaus R. Scherer;Nico H. Frijda

  • Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review.

    Jan De Houwer;Sarah Teige-Mocigemba;Adriaan Spruyt;Agnes Moors

  • What Is Learning? on the Nature and Merits of a Functional Definition of Learning

    Jan De Houwer;Dermot Barnes-Holmes;Agnes Moors

  • The Emotion Process: Event Appraisal and Component Differentiation

    Klaus R. Scherer;Klaus R. Scherer;Agnes Moors;Agnes Moors

  • Theories of emotion causation: A review

    Agnes Moors

  • Norms of valence, arousal, dominance, and age of acquisition for 4,300 Dutch words.

    Agnes Moors;Jan De Houwer;Dirk Hermans;Sabine Wanmaker

  • How to Define and Examine the Implicitness of Implicit Measures.

    Jan De Houwer;Agnes Moors

  • Implicit measures: similarities and differences

    Jan De Houwer;Agnes Moors

  • Automaticity: Componential, Causal, and Mechanistic Explanations

    Agnes Moors

  • On the Causal Role of Appraisal in Emotion

    Agnes Moors

  • The rise of affectivism

    Daniel Dukes;Daniel Dukes;Kathryn Abrams;Ralph Adolphs;Mohammed E. Ahmed

  • The Power of Goal-Directed Processes in the Causation of Emotional and Other Actions:

    Agnes Moors;Agnes Moors;Yannick Boddez;Jan De Houwer

  • Automatic Constructive Appraisal as a Candidate Cause of Emotion

    Agnes Moors

  • Flavors of Appraisal Theories of Emotion

    Agnes Moors

  • Novel attitudes can be faked on the Implicit Association Test

    Jan De Houwer;Tom Beckers;Agnes Moors

  • Automatic appraisal of motivational valence: Motivational affective priming and Simon effects

    Agnes Moors;Jan De Houwer

  • Can cognitive methods be used to study the unique aspect of emotion: An appraisal theorist's answer

    Agnes Moors

  • The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli

    Julia Vogt;Jan De Houwer;Agnes Moors;Stefaan Van Damme

  • The role of appraisal in emotion

    Agnes Moors;Klaus R. Scherer

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan De Houwer
Jan De Houwer Ghent University
Gilles Pourtois
Gilles Pourtois Ghent University
Klaus R. Scherer
Klaus R. Scherer University of Geneva
Peter Kuppens
Peter Kuppens KU Leuven
Marcel Brass
Marcel Brass Ghent University
Adriaan Spruyt
Adriaan Spruyt Ghent University
Paul Eelen
Paul Eelen KU Leuven
Dirk Hermans
Dirk Hermans KU Leuven
Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Phoebe C. Ellsworth University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in Psychology can open the door to various fulfilling career pathways, particularly in school counseling. Each state in the USA has its own set of standards and procedures for entering this field, so understanding regional differences is important.

For example, if you want to learn more about becoming a school counselor in Arizona, you’ll find specific educational requirements and steps unique to that state. Similarly, the requirements to be a school counselor in Arkansas are tailored to local educational policies.

Those interested in working on the West Coast should look into the requirements to be a school counselor in California, which outline needed credentials, exams, and practical experience. In contrast, if you plan to practice in Colorado, understanding the Colorado school counselor certification requirements is key.

Exploring these career pathways can help you make informed decisions about your future profession after earning a psychology degree, whether online or in-person.

Best Scientists Citing Agnes Moors

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles