World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
38
Citations
8397
World Ranking
7913
National Ranking
2169

Alison B. Flatau publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison B. Flatau sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 254 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Alison B. Flatau D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison B. Flatau sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alison B. Flatau is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of engineering, with a focus on computational mechanics and related subfields. These subfields include computational mechanics, ocean engineering, civil and structural engineering, mechanical engineering, and aerospace engineering.

Their recent research publications encompass diverse topics in fluid dynamics, materials science, and magnetic properties. Some of the selected recent papers are:

  • A Critical Review of Physical Models in High Temperature Multiphase Fluid Dynamics: Turbulent Transport and Particle-Wall Interactions, 2021, Applied Mechanics Reviews
  • Physical aspects of CMAS particle dynamics and deposition in turboshaft engines, 2020, Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources
  • Magnetic Particle Reinforced Elastomer Composites for Additive Manufacturing, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
  • Quantifying the dynamic spreading of a molten sand droplet using multiphase mesoscopic simulations, 2022, Physical Review Fluids
  • Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Simulation of High Velocity Impact Dynamics of Molten Sand Particles, 2020, Energies

The main topics of Alison B. Flatau's work include:

  • Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
  • Combustion and flame dynamics
  • Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
  • Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Magnetic properties of thin films

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
  • AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum
  • AIP Advances
  • Energies
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Alison B. Flatau has collaborated regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Atsufumi Hirohata
  • Nicoleta Lupu
  • Ron Goldfarb
  • Johannes Paulides
  • Lucian Prejbeanu

Best Publications

  • Review Paper: Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure:

    Peter C. Chang;Alison Flatau;S. C. Liu

  • Smart fabric sensors and e-textile technologies: a review

    Lina M Castano;Alison B Flatau

  • A review of magnetostrictive iron-gallium alloys

    Jayasimha Atulasimha;Alison B Flatau

  • Structural magnetic strain model for magnetostrictive transducers

    M.J. Dapino;R.C. Smith;A.B. Flatau

  • Energy-based hysteresis model for magnetostrictive transducers

    F.T. Calkins;R.C. Smith;A.B. Flatau

  • Tensile properties of magnetostrictive iron–gallium alloys

    R.A. Kellogg;A.M. Russell;A.M. Russell;T.A. Lograsso;T.A. Lograsso;A.B. Flatau

  • Temperature and stress dependencies of the magnetic and magnetostrictive properties of Fe0.81Ga0.19

    R. A. Kellogg;Alison B. Flatau;A. E. Clark;M. Wun-Fogle

  • Magnetic nanowires for acoustic sensors (invited)

    Patrick D. McGary;Liwen Tan;Jia Zou;Bethanie J. H. Stadler

  • Overview of Magnetostrictive Sensor Technology

    Frederick T. Calkins;Alison B. Flatau;Marcelo J. Dapino

  • Exceeding milli-watt powering magneto-mechano-electric generator for standalone-powered electronics

    Venkateswarlu Annapureddy;Suok Min Na;Geon Tae Hwang;Min Gyu Kang

  • A Coupled Structural-Magnetic Strain and Stress Model for Magnetostrictive Transducers.

    Marcelo J. Dapino;Ralph C. Smith;Leann E. Faidley;Alison B. Flatau

  • Quasi-static Transduction Characterization of Galfenol

    Rick A. Kellogg;Alison Flatau;Arthur E. Clark;Marilyn Wun-Fogle

  • Experimental Investigation of Terfenol-D's Elastic Modulus

    Rick Kellogg;Alison B. Flatau

  • Deformation behavior and magnetostriction of polycrystalline Fe–Ga–X (X=B,C,Mn,Mo,Nb,NbC) alloys

    Suok-Min Na;Alison B. Flatau

  • Development and Analysis of a Self-Sensing Magnetostrictive Actuator Design:

    Jon Pratt;Alison B. Flatau

  • Effect of prestress on the dynamic performace of a Terfenol-D transducer

    Frederick T. Calkins;Marcelo J. Dapino;Alison B. Flatau

  • Magnetostriction and magnetic heterogeneities in iron-gallium.

    Mark Laver;C. Mudivarthi;J.R. Cullen;A.B. Flatau

  • Stress and magnetic field dependent Young's modulus in single crystal iron-gallium alloys

    S. Datta;J. Atulasimha;C. Mudivarthi;A.B. Flatau

  • Single grain growth and large magnetostriction in secondarily recrystallized Fe–Ga thin sheet with sharp Goss (0 1 1)[1 0 0] orientation

    Suok-Min Na;Alison B. Flatau

  • Electrochemical Synthesis of Magnetostrictive Fe–Ga/Cu Multilayered Nanowire Arrays with Tailored Magnetic Response

    Sai Madhukar Reddy;Jung Jin Park;Suok-Min Na;Mazin M. Maqableh

  • Characterization and energy-based model of the magnetomechanical behavior of polycrystalline iron gallium alloys

    Jayasimha Atulasimha;Alison B Flatau;Eric Summers

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcelo J. Dapino
Marcelo J. Dapino The Ohio State University
Ralph C. Smith
Ralph C. Smith North Carolina State University
Thomas A. Lograsso
Thomas A. Lograsso Ames Laboratory
Darryll J. Pines
Darryll J. Pines University of Maryland, College Park
Manfred Wuttig
Manfred Wuttig University of Maryland, College Park
Hui Wang
Hui Wang Central South University
Harry A. Quigley
Harry A. Quigley Johns Hopkins University
Jian Luo
Jian Luo University of California, San Diego
Hyoung Jin Choi
Hyoung Jin Choi Inha University
Sanjay Sampath
Sanjay Sampath Stony Brook University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore options for studying Engineering and Technology in the USA, it is important to consider complementary online degree programs that can broaden your career opportunities. Many professionals pursue an organizational management degree online to enhance their leadership skills and effectively manage diverse teams within technical environments.

For those interested in the operational side of tech-driven industries, online mba programs in operations management provide a solid foundation in supply chain, process improvement, and project management—key areas for engineering leaders.

Flexibility is a top priority for many working professionals. Several no gmat online mba programs remove the barrier of entrance exams, making advanced business education more accessible for engineers seeking to move up the career ladder.

Cost is another major consideration. Today, you can find high-quality mba under 25k programs from reputable universities, helping you invest wisely in your future without excessive debt.

Best Scientists Citing Alison B. Flatau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles