World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tom Beckers

Tom Beckers

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5483 5093 77 74 301 8663

Tom Beckers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tom Beckers between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tom Beckers published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2013. 33 of the 350 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2013. 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 15 publications
1997 2025

350 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tom Beckers: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 2
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 7
2003 2
2004 6
2005 16
2006 7
2007 14
2008 15
2009 12
2010 14
2011 14
2012 20
2013 28
2014 24
2015 17
2016 17
2017 25
2018 8
2019 17
2020 11
2021 20
2022 5
2023 11
2024 18
2025 15
Total 350
Download as CSV

Tom Beckers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Beckers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 301 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 301
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tom Beckers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Beckers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tom Beckers is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and conducts research primarily in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their scholarly work spans various subfields including cognitive neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and social psychology.

The main topics addressed in their research cover areas such as memory and neural mechanisms, stress responses and cortisol, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Other focal points include neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and mental health research topics.

Beckers' publication record includes articles in notable venues with the highest number of publications appearing in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) and Behaviour Research and Therapy, followed by Cortex, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, and Nature Reviews Psychology.

  • Frequent publication venues:
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Cortex
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Nature Reviews Psychology

Recent papers by Beckers include:

  • Understanding clinical fear and anxiety through the lens of human fear conditioning, 2023, Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Dopamine: from prediction error to psychotherapy, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • No persistent attenuation of fear memories in humans: A registered replication of the reactivation-extinction effect, 2020, Cortex
  • The continued need for animals to advance brain research, 2021, Neuron
  • Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms: A verification report of Schiller et al. (2010), 2020, Cortex

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their scientific activity. Frequent co-authors include Laura Luyten, Bram Vervliet, Natalie Schroyens, Alba López-Moraga, and Lukas Van Oudenhove.

  • Frequent co-authors:
  • Laura Luyten
  • Bram Vervliet
  • Natalie Schroyens
  • Alba López-Moraga
  • Lukas Van Oudenhove

Overall, Beckers' work integrates multidisciplinary approaches within neuroscience and psychology to explore complex neural, cognitive, and behavioral mechanisms relevant to mental health and neurobiological functions.

Best Publications

  • Avoidance Learning: A Review of Theoretical Models and Recent Developments

    Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos;Marieke Effting;Merel Kindt;Tom Beckers

  • Prediction Error Governs Pharmacologically Induced Amnesia for Learned Fear

    Dieuwke Sevenster;Tom Beckers;Tom Beckers;Merel Kindt

  • What's wrong with fear conditioning?

    Tom Beckers;Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos;Yannick Boddez;Marieke Effting

  • Retrieval per se is not sufficient to trigger reconsolidation of human fear memory

    Dieuwke Sevenster;Tom Beckers;Tom Beckers;Merel Kindt

  • A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning.

    Jan De Houwer;Tom Beckers

  • Rating data are underrated: validity of US expectancy in human fear conditioning.

    Yannick Boddez;Frank Baeyens;Laura Luyten;Debora Vansteenwegen

  • Return of fear in a human differential conditioning paradigm caused by a return to the original acquistion context.

    Debora Vansteenwegen;Dirk Hermans;Bram Vervliet;Geert Francken

  • Reasoning rats: forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference.

    Tom Beckers;Ralph R. Miller;Jan De Houwer;Kouji Urushihara

  • Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking.

    Jan De Houwer;Tom Beckers;Steven Glautier

  • Advancing psychotherapy and evidence-based psychological interventions

    Paul M.G. Emmelkamp;Paul M.G. Emmelkamp;Daniel David;Daniel David;Tom Beckers;Peter Muris

  • Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning.

    Tom Beckers;Jan De Houwer;Oskar Pineño;Ralph R. Miller

  • Prediction error demarcates the transition from retrieval, to reconsolidation, to new learning.

    Dieuwke Sevenster;Tom Beckers;Merel Kindt

  • Memory reconsolidation interference as an emerging treatment for emotional disorders: Strengths, limitations, challenges and opportunities

    Tom Beckers;Merel Kindt

  • Concomitant deficits in working memory and fear extinction are functionally dissociated from reduced anxiety in metabotropic glutamate receptor 7-deficient mice.

    Zsuzsanna Callaerts-Vegh;Tom Beckers;Simon M. Ball;Frank Baeyens

  • Navigating the garden of forking paths for data exclusions in fear conditioning research

    Tina B Lonsdorf;Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens;Marta Andreatta;Marta Andreatta;Tom Beckers

  • Novel attitudes can be faked on the Implicit Association Test

    Jan De Houwer;Tom Beckers;Agnes Moors

  • Fear conditioning of SCR but not the startle reflex requires conscious discrimination of threat and safety

    Dieuwke Sevenster;Tom Beckers;Tom Beckers;Merel Kindt

  • Evidence for the role of higher order reasoning processes in cue competition and other learning phenomena.

    Jan De Houwer;Tom Beckers;Stefaan Vandorpe

  • Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning.

    Jan De Houwer;Tom Beckers

  • Counterconditioning reduces cue-induced craving and actual cue-elicited consumption.

    Dinska Van Gucht;Frank Baeyens;Debora Vansteenwegen;Dirk Hermans

Frequent Co-Authors

Merel Kindt
Merel Kindt University of Amsterdam
Frank Baeyens
Frank Baeyens KU Leuven
Dirk Hermans
Dirk Hermans KU Leuven
Jan De Houwer
Jan De Houwer Ghent University
Bram Vervliet
Bram Vervliet KU Leuven
Rudi D'Hooge
Rudi D'Hooge KU Leuven
Ralph R. Miller
Ralph R. Miller Binghamton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a Psychology degree in the USA, exploring related online programs and licensure pathways is essential, especially if you’re seeking a career as a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). Online degrees can provide the flexibility to complete coursework from anywhere, making it easier to balance studies with other commitments.

Each state has unique requirements for those wishing to become an LPC. For example, South Dakota lpc licensure requirements focus on coursework, supervised experience, and a passing score on the National Counselor Examination. In contrast, Tennessee lpc licensure requirements require a graduate degree in counseling and specific numbers of supervision hours.

Similarly, the lpc license requirements in Texas stipulate degree prerequisites and practical experience, while lpc licensure requirements in Utah emphasize supervised clinical training and examinations.

When planning your studies, it’s important to choose an online program accredited in the state where you wish to practice. Researching each pathway will help you better prepare for your future career as a licensed counselor.

Best Scientists Citing Tom Beckers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles