World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
6558
World Ranking
8834
National Ranking
102

Miguel A. Vadillo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miguel A. Vadillo sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 218 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Miguel A. Vadillo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miguel A. Vadillo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miguel A. Vadillo is affiliated with the Autonomous University of Madrid in Spain. Their research primarily covers Neuroscience and Psychology, with a significant focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology as subfields. Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, and General Decision Sciences are additional areas within their research scope.

The scientist's work spans several key topics, including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Miguel A. Vadillo has contributed to multiple publication venues with a high frequency of articles appearing in:

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Journal of Cognition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequently collaborating researchers include David R. Shanks, David Luque, Tamara Giménez-Fernández, Darías Holgado, and Daniel Sanabria.

Their recent published papers document a range of psychological and cognitive research topics. Notable papers include:

  • "Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review." (2021, Psychological Bulletin)
  • "To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply?" (2021, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • "An umbrella review of randomized control trials on the effects of physical exercise on cognition" (2023, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • "Please don't stop the music: A meta-analysis of the cognitive and academic benefits of instrumental musical training in childhood and adolescence" (2022, Educational Research Review)
  • "Is project-based learning effective among kindergarten and elementary students? A systematic review" (2021, PLoS ONE)

Best Publications

  • Justify your alpha

    Daniel Lakens;Federico G. Adolfi;Federico G. Adolfi;Casper J. Albers;Farid Anvari

  • The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network

    Hannah Moshontz;Lorne Campbell;Charles R. Ebersole;Hans Ijzerman

  • Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning

    Miguel A. Vadillo;Emmanouil Konstantinidis;David R. Shanks

  • Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review

    Chunliang Yang;Liang Luo;Miguel A. Vadillo;Rongjun Yu

  • Researching Mental Health Disorders in the Era of Social Media: Systematic Review.

    Akkapon Wongkoblap;Miguel A Vadillo;Vasa Curcin

  • Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence among Spanish Teachers and an Exploration of Cross-Cultural Variation.

    Marta Ferrero;Pablo Garaizar;Miguel A. Vadillo

  • To which world regions does the valence–dominance model of social perception apply?

    Benedict C. Jones;Lisa M. DeBruine;Jessica K. Flake;Marco Tullio Liuzza

  • Illusions of causality: How they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced

    Helena Matute;Fernando Blanco;Ion Yarritu;Marcos Díaz-Lago

  • Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience.

    Helena Matute;Ion Yarritu;Miguel A. Vadillo

  • The Bitter Truth About Sugar and Willpower: The Limited Evidential Value of the Glucose Model of Ego Depletion.

    Miguel A. Vadillo;Natalie Gold;Magda Osman

  • The procedural learning deficit hypothesis of language learning disorders: we see some problems

    Gillian West;Miguel A. Vadillo;David R. Shanks;Charles Hulme

  • Illusion of control: The role of personal involvement.

    Ion Yarritu;Helena Matute;Miguel A. Vadillo

  • Making the uncontrollable seem controllable: The role of action in the illusion of control

    Fernando Blanco;Helena Matute;Miguel A. Vadillo

  • An umbrella review of randomized control trials on the effects of physical exercise on cognition

    Unknown

  • Romance, risk, and replication: Can consumer choices and risk-taking be primed by mating motives?

    David R. Shanks;Miguel A. Vadillo;Benjamin Riedel;Ashley Clymo

  • Does Mindfulness Meditation Training Enhance Executive Control? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Adults

    Luis Cásedas;Miguel A. Vadillo;Juan Lupiáñez

  • Registered Replication Report: Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998):

    Michael O'Donnell;Leif D Nelson;Evi Ackermann;Balazs Aczel

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on episodic memory

    Giulia Galli;Miguel A. Vadillo;Miroslav Sirota;Matteo Feurra

  • Learned predictiveness influences rapid attentional capture: evidence from the dot probe task.

    Mike E. Le Pelley;Miguel Vadillo;David Luque

  • Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.

    Miguel A. Vadillo;Helena Matute

  • Interactive effects of the probability of the cue and the probability of the outcome on the overestimation of null contingency

    Fernando Blanco;Helena Matute;Miguel A. Vadillo

Frequent Co-Authors

Helena Matute
Helena Matute University of Deusto
David R. Shanks
David R. Shanks University College London
Jan De Houwer
Jan De Houwer Ghent University
Mike E. Le Pelley
Mike E. Le Pelley University of New South Wales
Juan Lupiáñez
Juan Lupiáñez University of Granada
José C. Perales
José C. Perales University of Granada
William J. Chopik
William J. Chopik Michigan State University
Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Lisa M. DeBruine
Lisa M. DeBruine University of Glasgow
Zoltan Dienes
Zoltan Dienes University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the rising demand for mental health professionals and the flexibility of distance learning, online psychology degrees are becoming more popular—and accessible—than ever. Many U.S. universities now offer affordable online options, allowing students to study regardless of location or schedule. Choosing an online program can lower expenses while maintaining high academic standards.

Prospective students looking to minimize debt should consider the cheapest online psychology master's programs in New York and explore the most affordable online master's psychology degree programs in Texas. Pennsylvania residents also benefit from a range of options, as outlined in the resource on affordable online psychology programs in Pennsylvania.

For those interested in starting with an undergraduate education, Texas is a leader in budget-friendly online options. Dive into the cheapest online psychology programs in Texas to begin your academic journey.

Earning a psychology degree online opens doors to careers in counseling, therapy, human resources, research, and beyond, offering the flexibility to work in hospitals, schools, private practice, or corporate environments.

Best Scientists Citing Miguel A. Vadillo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles