World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
76
Citations
19790
World Ranking
1724
National Ranking
196

Lisa M. DeBruine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. DeBruine sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 315 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lisa M. DeBruine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. DeBruine sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisa M. DeBruine is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research in the field of psychology. Their work spans several subfields including experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, marketing, and sociology and political science.

The primary research focus lies within evolutionary psychology and human behavior, which encompasses investigations into areas such as the psychology of moral and emotional judgment, body image and dysmorphia studies, face recognition and perception, consumer behavior in brand consumption and identification, scientific computing and data management, and sexual function and dysfunction studies.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
  • Evolution and Human Behavior
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by DeBruine are:

  • "Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy" (2020, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • "To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply?" (2021, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • "Understanding Mixed-Effects Models Through Data Simulation" (2021, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science)
  • "Putting the Self in Self-Correction: Findings From the Loss-of-Confidence Project" (2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science)
  • "Not within spitting distance: Salivary immunoassays of estradiol have subpar validity for predicting cycle phase" (2022, Psychoneuroendocrinology)

DeBruine frequently collaborates with a group of co-authors, notably including:

  • Benedict C. Jones
  • Amanda Hahn
  • Iris J. Holzleitner
  • Anthony J. Lee
  • Victor Kenji Medeiros Shiramizu

Best Publications

  • Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

    Anthony C. Little;Benedict C. Jones;Lisa M. DeBruine

  • Facial resemblance enhances trust

    Lisa Marie Debruine

  • Justify your alpha

    Daniel Lakens;Federico G. Adolfi;Federico G. Adolfi;Casper J. Albers;Farid Anvari

  • Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice.

    D.R. Feinberg;B.C. Jones;B.C. Jones;M.J. Law Smith;F.R. Moore

  • The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces

    Lisa M. DeBruine;Benedict C. Jones;John R. Crawford;Lisa L. M. Welling

  • The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network

    Hannah Moshontz;Lorne Campbell;Charles R. Ebersole;Hans Ijzerman

  • Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance

    Lisa Marie Debruine

  • Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity

    Lisa M DeBruine;Benedict C Jones;Anthony C Little;Lynda G Boothroyd

  • Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high.

    B.C. Jones;A.C. Little;L.G. Boothroyd;L.M. Debruine

  • Facial correlates of sociosexuality

    Lynda G. Boothroyd;Lynda G. Boothroyd;Benedict C. Jones;Benedict C. Jones;D. Michael Burt;D. Michael Burt;Lisa M. DeBruine

  • Raised salivary testosterone in women is associated with increased attraction to masculine faces.

    Lisa Welling;Benedict Christopher Jones;Lisa Marie Debruine;C. A. Conway

  • Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences.

    Benedict C. Jones;Lisa M. DeBruine;David I. Perrett;Anthony C. Little

  • The role of femininity and averageness of voice pitch in aesthetic judgments of women's voices.

    David R. Feinberg;Lisa DeBruine;Benedict Christopher Jones;David I. Perrett

  • Correlated preferences for men's facial and vocal masculinity

    David R. Feinberg;Lisa M. DeBruine;Benedict C. Jones;Anthony C. Little

  • Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces

    Anthony C. Little;Lisa M. DeBruine;Benedict C. Jones

  • Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy.

    Hans IJzerman;Neil A. Lewis;Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein

  • A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch.

    Benedict C. Jones;David R. Feinberg;Lisa M. DeBruine;Anthony C. Little

  • Sexual Selection on Human Faces and Voices

    David A. Puts;Benedict C. Jones;Lisa M. DeBruine

  • No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status:

    Benedict C. Jones;Amanda C. Hahn;Claire I. Fisher;Hongyi Wang

  • Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces

    A. C. Little;Lisa Marie Debruine;Benedict Christopher Jones

  • Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers

    Benedict C. Jones;Lisa M. DeBruine;Julie C. Main;Anthony C. Little

  • Social Perception of Facial Resemblance in Humans

    Lisa M. DeBruine;Benedict C. Jones;Anthony C. Little;David I. Perrett

Frequent Co-Authors

Benedict C. Jones
Benedict C. Jones University of Strathclyde
Anthony C. Little
Anthony C. Little University of Bath
David R. Feinberg
David R. Feinberg McMaster University
Lisa L. M. Welling
Lisa L. M. Welling Oakland University
S. Craig Roberts
S. Craig Roberts University of Stirling
David I. Perrett
David I. Perrett University of St Andrews
Joshua M. Tybur
Joshua M. Tybur Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Katarzyna Pisanski
Katarzyna Pisanski French National Centre for Scientific Research
Daniel Lakens
Daniel Lakens Eindhoven University of Technology
Marion Petrie
Marion Petrie Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide variety of career opportunities, both online and on campus. After earning a bachelor’s or master’s in psychology, many graduates consider online programs to further their credentials, especially to become licensed therapists or counselors.

Each state has unique requirements for licensure, so it’s important to research local regulations and education pathways. For example, those interested in becoming a Tampa licensed therapist requirements must complete a specific number of supervised clinical hours and pass relevant examinations. Similarly, licensed therapist requirements in Toledo may include additional coursework and background checks.

Other locations may have different educational pathways, such as the Tucson licensed therapist requirements that often focus more on state-specific exams. If you’re considering settling in Oklahoma, be sure to review the Tulsa licensed therapist education requirements as well.

By understanding regional differences, you can choose the ideal online degree and build a successful career in psychology or counseling wherever you plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa M. DeBruine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles