World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
17553
World Ranking
5337
National Ranking
254

Joshua M. Tybur publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua M. Tybur sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 144 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joshua M. Tybur D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua M. Tybur sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joshua M. Tybur is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans Psychology, Neuroscience, and Social Sciences, with a strong focus on interdisciplinary approaches within these fields. The scientist has published extensively in Psychology, with notable contributions also to Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology subfields.

Their research portfolio encompasses several specialized areas, including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science. Main research topics reflect a broad engagement with psychological phenomena, with a concentration on:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Joshua M. Tybur has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, reflecting ongoing research partnerships including:

  • Lei Fan
  • Tom R. Kupfer
  • Laura W. Wesseldijk
  • Patrick Jern
  • Çağla Çınar

The scientist publishes regularly in reputable venues associated with psychology and human behavior. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Evolution and Human Behavior
  • Psychological Science
  • Appetite
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • Food Quality and Preference

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Joshua M. Tybur are:

  • Behavioral Immune Trade-Offs: Interpersonal Value Relaxes Social Pathogen Avoidance, 2020, Psychological Science
  • What Role Does Pathogen-Avoidance Psychology Play in Pandemics?, 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Direct and indirect punishment of norm violations in daily life, 2020, Nature Communications
  • The multidimensional nature of food neophobia, 2021, Appetite
  • Is green the new sexy? Romantic of conspicuous conservation, 2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology

Best Publications

  • Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation.

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Tybur;Bram Van den Bergh

  • Microbes, mating, and morality: individual differences in three functional domains of disgust.

    Joshua M. Tybur;Debra Lieberman;Vladas Griskevicius

  • Disgust: Evolved Function and Structure

    Joshua M. Tybur;Debra Lieberman;Robert Kurzban;Peter DeScioli

  • Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals.

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Tybur;Jill M. Sundie;Robert B. Cialdini

  • The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: a life history theory approach.

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Tybur;Andrew W. Delton;Theresa E. Robertson

  • Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings

    Richard A. Klein;Michelangelo Vianello;Fred Hasselman;Byron G. Adams

  • Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous Consumption as a Sexual Signaling System

    Jill M. Sundie;Douglas T. Kenrick;Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Tybur

  • When the Economy Falters, Do People Spend or Save? Responses to Resource Scarcity Depend on Childhood Environments

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Ackerman;Stephanie M. Cantú;Andrew W. Delton

  • Environmental Contingency in Life History Strategies: The Influence of Mortality and Socioeconomic Status on Reproductive Timing

    Vladas Griskevicius;Andrew W. Delton;Theresa E. Robertson;Joshua M. Tybur

  • Aggress to impress: hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy.

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Tybur;Steven W. Gangestad;Elaine F. Perea

  • Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap-dancers: Economic evidence for human estrus?

    Geoffrey Miller;Joshua M. Tybur;Brent D. Jordan

  • The financial consequences of too many men: sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending.

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Tybur;Joshua M. Ackerman;Andrew W. Delton

  • Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations

    Joshua M. Tybur;Yoel Inbar;Lene Aarøe;Pat Barclay

  • Functional Interdependence Theory: An Evolutionary Account of Social Situations.

    Daniel Balliet;Joshua M. Tybur;Paul A. M. Van Lange

  • Extending the Behavioral Immune System to Political Psychology: Are Political Conservatism and Disgust Sensitivity Really Related?:

    Joshua M. Tybur;Leslie A. Merriman;Ann E. Caldwell Hooper;Melissa M. McDonald

  • Disgust sensitivity, obesity stigma, and gender: contamination psychology predicts weight bias for women, not men.

    Debra L. Lieberman;Josh M. Tybur;Janet D. Latner

  • Disgust and Anger Relate to Different Aggressive Responses to Moral Violations.

    Catherine Molho;Joshua M. Tybur;Ezgi Güler;Daniel Balliet

  • Sex differences and sex similarities in disgust sensitivity

    Joshua M. Tybur;Angela D. Bryan;Debra Lieberman;Ann E. Caldwell Hooper

  • What Can Cross-Cultural Correlations Teach Us about Human Nature?

    Thomas V. Pollet;Joshua M. Tybur;Willem E. Frankenhuis;Ian J. Rickard

  • Direct and indirect punishment of norm violations in daily life.

    Catherine Molho;Joshua M. Tybur;Paul A. M. Van Lange;Daniel Balliet

  • Blatant Benevolence and Conspicuous Consumption: When Romantic Motives Elicit Strategic Costly Signals

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua Tybur;Jill Sundie

  • The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending.

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Tybur;Andrew W. Delton;Theresa E. Robertson

Frequent Co-Authors

Vladas Griskevicius
Vladas Griskevicius University of Minnesota
Paul A. M. Van Lange
Paul A. M. Van Lange Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Daniel Balliet
Daniel Balliet Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Debra Lieberman
Debra Lieberman University of Miami
Reinout E. de Vries
Reinout E. de Vries Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Joshua M. Ackerman
Joshua M. Ackerman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Benedict C. Jones
Benedict C. Jones University of Strathclyde
Mark van Vugt
Mark van Vugt Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Patrick Jern
Patrick Jern Åbo Akademi University
Lisa M. DeBruine
Lisa M. DeBruine University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Psychology in the USA, it’s important to also explore related online degrees and the career paths they offer. The demand for professionals in counseling, social work, school psychology, and mental health services continues to rise, leading to the development of flexible online programs suited for diverse student needs.

Graduate degrees in counseling are among the most sought-after options, and many institutions now offer fully online or hybrid programs. For those exploring programs in Florida, check out the most popular counseling degree programs in Florida to see what’s available. Similarly, Georgia offers a variety of flexible training options—see the popular counseling programs in Georgia for a comprehensive overview.

Massachusetts is known for its top-ranked counseling degree programs in Massachusetts, many of which have online components that are ideal for working professionals. If you are based in the Midwest or interested in national comparisons, Michigan boasts a range of choices as well—learn more at the top-ranked counseling degree programs in Michigan.

Ultimately, earning a psychology-related online degree can prepare you for meaningful roles in counseling, therapy, human resources, education, and beyond. Exploring region-specific programs ensures you find the best fit for your career goals and personal needs.

Best Scientists Citing Joshua M. Tybur

Trending Scientists