World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
75
Citations
31947
World Ranking
1754
National Ranking
1035

Douglas T. Kenrick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas T. Kenrick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 227 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Douglas T. Kenrick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas T. Kenrick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Douglas T. Kenrick is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of psychology, with a significant emphasis on experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, and gender studies.

The central topics of their work concentrate on evolutionary psychology and human behavior, cultural differences and values, social and intergroup psychology, marriage and sexual relationships, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, and consumer behavior in brand consumption and identification.

Kenrick has published extensively in several venues, most notably Harvard Dataverse, with 14 publications. Other frequent publication venues include Evolution and Human Behavior, Scientific Data, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, and Current Directions in Psychological Science.

Notable recent papers from Kenrick's body of work include:

  • Friendship jealousy: One tool for maintaining friendships in the face of third-party threats?, 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Family still matters: Human social motivation across 42 countries during a global pandemic, 2022, Evolution and Human Behavior
  • Fundamental Motives Illuminate a Broad Range of Individual and Cultural Variations in Thought and Behavior, 2021, Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • Sex (similarities and) differences in friendship jealousy, 2021, Evolution and Human Behavior
  • Fundamental social motives measured across forty-two cultures in two waves, 2022, Scientific Data

Kenrick has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Jaimie Arona Krems, Keelah E. G. Williams, Athena Aktipis, Daniel David, and Michael E. W. Varnum. These recurring collaborations have contributed to advancing various themes within their research areas.

In addition to journal articles, Kenrick has produced book publications, such as "Solving modern problems with a stone-age brain: Human evolution and the seven fundamental motives," published by the American Psychological Association in 2022.

The scientist's contributions have been recognized through professional distinctions, including being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 2004.

Best Publications

  • Renovating the Pyramid of Needs: Contemporary Extensions Built Upon Ancient Foundations

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Vladas Griskevicius;Steven L. Neuberg;Mark Schaller

  • Profiting from controversy. Lessons from the person-situation debate.

    Douglas T. Kenrick;David C. Funder

  • The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.

    Norman P. Li;J. Michael Bailey;Douglas T. Kenrick;Joan A. W. Linsenmeier

  • Evolution, Traits, and the Stages of Human Courtship: Qualifying the Parental Investment Model

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Edward K. Sadalla;Gary Groth;Melanie R. Trost

  • Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies.

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Richard C. Keefe

  • Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals.

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Tybur;Jill M. Sundie;Robert B. Cialdini

  • Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why.

    Norman P. Li;Douglas T. Kenrick

  • Evolutionary Social Psychology

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Jon K. Maner;Norman P. Li

  • Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous Consumption as a Sexual Signaling System

    Jill M. Sundie;Douglas T. Kenrick;Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Tybur

  • Functional projection: how fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception.

    Jon K. Maner;Douglas T. Kenrick;D. Vaughn Becker;Theresa E. Robertson

  • Dynamical evolutionary psychology: individual decision rules and emergent social norms.

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Norman P. Li;Jonathan Butner

  • Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria.

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Gary E. Groth;Melanie R. Trost;Edward K. Sadalla

  • Altruism as hedonism: A social development perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping.

    Robert B. Cialdini;Douglas T. Kenrick

  • Dominance and heterosexual attraction

    Edward K. Sadalla;Douglas T. Kenrick;Beth Vershure

  • Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social problem.

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Sara E. Gutierres

  • Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance

    Steven L. Neuberg;Douglas T. Kenrick;Mark Schaller

  • Going Along Versus Going Alone: When Fundamental Motives Facilitate Strategic (Non)Conformity

    Vladas Griskevicius;Noah J. Goldstein;Chad R. Mortensen;Robert B. Cialdini

  • The confounded nature of angry men and happy women.

    D. Vaughn Becker;Douglas T. Kenrick;Steven L. Neuberg;K. C. Blackwell

  • Sexually Selective Cognition: Beauty Captures the Mind of the Beholder

    Jon K. Maner;Douglas T. Kenrick;D. Vaughn Becker;Andrew W. Delton

  • Fundamental motives: How evolutionary needs influence consumer behavior

    Vladas Griskevicius;Douglas T. Kenrick

  • Infection Breeds Reticence: The Effects of Disease Salience on Self-Perceptions of Personality and Behavioral Avoidance Tendencies

    Chad R. Mortensen;D. Vaughn Becker;Joshua M. Ackerman;Steven L. Neuberg

  • Evolution and Social Psychology

    Mark Schaller;Jeffry A. Simpson;Douglas T. Kenrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven L. Neuberg
Steven L. Neuberg Arizona State University
Mark Schaller
Mark Schaller University of British Columbia
Vladas Griskevicius
Vladas Griskevicius University of Minnesota
Jeffry A. Simpson
Jeffry A. Simpson University of Minnesota
Robert B. Cialdini
Robert B. Cialdini Arizona State University
Jon K. Maner
Jon K. Maner Florida State University
Joshua M. Ackerman
Joshua M. Ackerman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Norman P. Li
Norman P. Li Singapore Management University
A.B. Cohen
A.B. Cohen Arizona State University
Jonathan Butner
Jonathan Butner University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and rewarding career paths. Many U.S. universities now provide flexible online psychology programs that rival traditional, in-person offerings, giving students more opportunities to specialize in areas like counseling, clinical research, and organizational psychology.

Around the country, different cities have become hubs for high-quality psychology education. For example, students searching for best-ranked psychology degree programs in Fort Worth will discover a diverse curriculum focused on real-world applications. Similarly, those interested in popular psychology degrees in Kent can benefit from strong faculty expertise and hands-on learning.

Options remain just as strong in other cities, too. Prospective students may wish to research popular psychology degrees in Las Vegas or seek out best-ranked psychology degree programs in Nashville for additional choices.

With a psychology degree, graduates pursue diverse pathways—such as mental health counseling, human resources, educational psychology, and research. The flexibility and credibility of U.S. online and on-campus degrees support lifelong career growth in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas T. Kenrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles