World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
27976
World Ranking
3620
National Ranking
2032

Steven L. Neuberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven L. Neuberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 131 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Steven L. Neuberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven L. Neuberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2004 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Steven L. Neuberg is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States and specializes in research primarily within the social sciences and psychology.

Their work spans multiple subfields including sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, gender studies, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical psychology.

Neuberg's research focuses on a variety of topics, prominently covering:

  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Frequent publication venues for Neuberg include:

  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
  • American Psychologist
  • Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
  • Conflict Management and Peace Science

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Neuberg demonstrate a broad interdisciplinary reach and include:

  • "Updating Long-Held Assumptions About Fat Stigma: For Women, Body Shape Plays a Critical Role" (2021), published in Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • "Integrating institutional approaches and decision science to address climate change: a multi-level collective action research agenda" (2021), published in Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
  • "Grievances and rebellion: Comparing relative deprivation and horizontal inequality" (2020), published in Conflict Management and Peace Science
  • "Effects of economic uncertainty and socioeconomic status on reproductive timing: A life history approach" (2022), published in Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
  • "Desire for social status affects marital and reproductive attitudes: A life history mismatch perspective" (2023), published in Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology

Steven L. Neuberg has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Ahra Ko
  • Jaimie Arona Krems
  • Cari M. Pick
  • Michael Barlev
  • Keelah E. G. Williams

Neuberg has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 2020 and as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 2004.

Best Publications

  • A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation

    Susan T. Fiske;Steven L. Neuberg

  • Reinterpreting the Empathy-Altruism Relationship: When One Into One Equals Oneness

    Robert B. Cialdini;Stephanie L. Brown;Brian P. Lewis;Carol Luce

  • Different emotional reactions to different groups: a sociofunctional threat-based approach to "prejudice".

    Catherine A. Cottrell;Steven L. Neuberg

  • Renovating the Pyramid of Needs: Contemporary Extensions Built Upon Ancient Foundations

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Vladas Griskevicius;Steven L. Neuberg;Mark Schaller

  • Personal Need for Structure: Individual Differences in the Desire for Simple Structure

    Steven L. Neuberg;Jason T. Newsom

  • Motivational Influences on Impression Formation: Outcome Dependency, Accuracy-Driven Attention, and Individuating Processes

    Steven L. Neuberg;Susan Tufts Fiske

  • Functional projection: how fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception.

    Jon K. Maner;Douglas T. Kenrick;D. Vaughn Becker;Theresa E. Robertson

  • Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance

    Steven L. Neuberg;Douglas T. Kenrick;Mark Schaller

  • The confounded nature of angry men and happy women.

    D. Vaughn Becker;Douglas T. Kenrick;Steven L. Neuberg;K. C. Blackwell

  • From Stereotype Threat to Stereotype Threats: Implications of a Multi-Threat Framework for Causes, Moderators, Mediators, Consequences, and Interventions

    Jenessa R. Shapiro;Steven L. Neuberg

  • Sexually Selective Cognition: Beauty Captures the Mind of the Beholder

    Jon K. Maner;Douglas T. Kenrick;D. Vaughn Becker;Andrew W. Delton

  • What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics

    Catherine A. Cottrell;Steven L. Neuberg;Norman P. Li

  • Infection Breeds Reticence: The Effects of Disease Salience on Self-Perceptions of Personality and Behavioral Avoidance Tendencies

    Chad R. Mortensen;D. Vaughn Becker;Joshua M. Ackerman;Steven L. Neuberg

  • Category-based and attribute-based reactions to others: Some informational conditions of stereotyping and individuating processes

    Susan T Fiske;Steven L Neuberg;Ann E Beattie;Sandra J Milberg

  • The effects of perspective taking on motivations for helping: Still no evidence for altruism.

    Jon K. Maner;Carol L. Luce;Steven L. Neuberg;Robert B. Cialdini

  • They All Look the Same to Me (Unless They're Angry): From Out-Group Homogeneity to Out-Group Heterogeneity

    Joshua M. Ackerman;Jenessa R. Shapiro;Steven L. Neuberg;Douglas T. Kenrick

  • What the Need for Closure Scale Measures and What It Does Not: Toward Differentiating Among Related Epistemic Motives

    Steven L. Neuberg;T. Nicole Judice;Stephen G. West

  • Goal-Driven Cognition and Functional Behavior The Fundamental-Motives Framework

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Steven L. Neuberg;Vladas Griskevicius;D. Vaughn Becker

  • The goal of forming accurate impressions during social interactions: attenuating the impact of negative expectancies.

    Steven L. Neuberg

  • Why people stigmatize: Toward a biocultural framework.

    Steven L. Neuberg;Dylan M. Smith;Terrilee Asher

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas T. Kenrick
Douglas T. Kenrick Arizona State University
Mark Schaller
Mark Schaller University of British Columbia
Joshua M. Ackerman
Joshua M. Ackerman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jon K. Maner
Jon K. Maner Florida State University
Robert B. Cialdini
Robert B. Cialdini Arizona State University
Vladas Griskevicius
Vladas Griskevicius University of Minnesota
Susan T. Fiske
Susan T. Fiske Princeton University
Norman P. Li
Norman P. Li Singapore Management University
Stephanie L. Brown
Stephanie L. Brown University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeremy C. Biesanz
Jeremy C. Biesanz University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology can open the door to rewarding careers in counseling, research, education, and mental health services. For many students, cost is an important factor when choosing the right program. Fortunately, there are several options for those seeking affordable pathways to a psychology degree—many of which are available fully online.

You can find some of the cheapest psychology programs in Illinois and the affordable psychology degrees in Indiana, both offering flexible study modes and budget-friendly tuition. Kentucky also provides a range of the cheapest psychology programs in Kentucky for those interested in starting their journey with minimal financial burden.

If you are considering a major city, explore the most affordable psychology degree programs in Los Angeles to take advantage of the city’s dynamic opportunities and growing job market. Regardless of location, online psychology degrees offer flexibility and diverse career pathways—making them an excellent option for future professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Steven L. Neuberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles