World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
15454
World Ranking
5126
National Ranking
11

Norman P. Li publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norman P. Li sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 185 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Norman P. Li D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norman P. Li sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Norman P. Li is affiliated with Singapore Management University in Singapore. Their research spans multiple areas in psychology and social sciences, with a strong emphasis on evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

Their recent notable publications include:

  • Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Crisis communication, anticipated food scarcity, and food preferences: Preregistered evidence of the insurance hypothesis, 2021, Food Quality and Preference
  • Too cynical to reconnect: Cynicism moderates the effect of social exclusion on prosociality through empathy, 2021, Personality and Individual Differences
  • Evolutionary psychology's next challenge: Solving modern problems using a mismatch perspective, 2020, Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences

Norman P. Li has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Jose C. Yong
  • Lynn K. L. Tan
  • Bryan K. C. Choy
  • Sylvie Graf
  • Martina Hřebı́čková

Publications involving Norman P. Li commonly appear in the following venues:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Journal of Personality
  • Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences

The primary fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Subfields of study explored in their research are:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Applied Psychology

The main topics within their research portfolio cover:

  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Best Publications

  • The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.

    Norman P. Li;J. Michael Bailey;Douglas T. Kenrick;Joan A. W. Linsenmeier

  • The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men

    Peter K. Jonason;Norman P. Li;Gregory D. Webster;David P. Schmitt

  • The Attractive Female Body Weight and Female Body Dissatisfaction in 26 Countries Across 10 World Regions: Results of the International Body Project I

    Viren Swami;David A Frederick;Toivo Aavik;Lidia Alcalay

  • Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why.

    Norman P. Li;Douglas T. Kenrick

  • Evolutionary Social Psychology

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Jon K. Maner;Norman P. Li

  • Dynamical evolutionary psychology: individual decision rules and emergent social norms.

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Norman P. Li;Jonathan Butner

  • What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics

    Catherine A. Cottrell;Steven L. Neuberg;Norman P. Li

  • Sex differences in cooperation: a meta-analytic review of social dilemmas.

    Daniel Balliet;Norman P. Li;Shane J. Macfarlan;Mark Van Vugt

  • The Antihero in Popular Culture: Life History Theory and the Dark Triad Personality Traits

    Peter K. Jonason;Gregory D. Webster;David P. Schmitt;Norman P. Li

  • The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad : implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics

    Peter K. Jonason;Norman P. Li;David M. Buss

  • Changes in Women's Choice of Dress Across the Ovulatory Cycle: Naturalistic and Laboratory Task-Based Evidence

    Kristina M. Durante;Norman P. Li;Martie G. Haselton

  • Ovulation, Female Competition, and Product Choice: Hormonal Influences on Consumer Behavior

    Kristina M. Durante;Vladas Griskevicius;Sarah E. Hill;Carin Perilloux

  • Who is James Bond? : the Dark Triad as an agentic social style

    Peter K Jonason;Norman P Li;Emily A Teicher

  • The Evolutionary Mismatch Hypothesis: Implications for Psychological Science:

    Norman P. Li;Mark van Vugt;Mark van Vugt;Stephen M. Colarelli

  • Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations

    Joshua M. Tybur;Yoel Inbar;Lene Aarøe;Pat Barclay

  • Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection

    Norman P. Li;Jose C. Yong;William Tov;Oliver Sng

  • Dynamical Evolutionary Psychology: Mapping the Domains of the New Interactionist Paradigm

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Jon K. Maner;Jon Butner;Norman P. Li

  • Mate-selection and the Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy and creating a volatile environment

    Peter K. Jonason;Katherine A. Valentine;Norman P. Li;Carmelita L. Harbeson

  • Registered Replication Report : Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012)

    S. Bouwmeester;P. P. J. L. Verkoeijen;P. P. J. L. Verkoeijen;B. Aczel;Fernando Barbosa

  • Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision Making

    Douglas T. Kenrick;Vladas Griskevicius;Jill M. Sundie;Norman P. Li

  • Ovulation, Female Competition, and Product Choice: Hormonal Influences on Consumer Behavior

    Kristina Durante;Vladas Griskevicius;Norman Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter K. Jonason
Peter K. Jonason VIZJA University
Douglas T. Kenrick
Douglas T. Kenrick Arizona State University
Mark van Vugt
Mark van Vugt Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Vladas Griskevicius
Vladas Griskevicius University of Minnesota
Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Daniel Balliet
Daniel Balliet Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Gregory D. Webster
Gregory D. Webster University of Florida
Tatsuya Kameda
Tatsuya Kameda Meiji Gakuin University
David P. Schmitt
David P. Schmitt Kansas State University
Michael Bang Petersen
Michael Bang Petersen Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in Psychology can open doors to diverse career pathways, especially in professional counseling. Many graduates pursue licensure as a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), which requires meeting specific state-by-state criteria. Each state has unique requirements related to education, supervised experience, and examinations. For instance, those interested in practicing in North Dakota should review the North Dakota licensed professional counselor requirements to understand the process there.

If you're considering a career in the Midwest, the Ohio lpc licensure requirements outline the steps you’ll need to take for licensure in Ohio. In states like Oklahoma, it's crucial to familiarize yourself with the lpc license requirements in Oklahoma as regulations can differ significantly. The process in Oregon also stands out, so prospective counselors should check the Oregon licensed professional counselor requirements before enrolling in a program.

Online psychology programs offer flexibility for students nationwide, but always ensure your chosen path aligns with the licensure requirements of your intended state of practice.

Best Scientists Citing Norman P. Li

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles