World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10819 10130 36 35 118 5358

Tatsuya Kameda publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tatsuya Kameda between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tatsuya Kameda published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2011. 13 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2011. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 4 publications
1983 2025

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tatsuya Kameda: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 2
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 4
2003 5
2004 5
2005 4
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 6
2011 13
2012 3
2013 2
2014 5
2015 4
2016 5
2017 12
2018 7
2019 8
2020 7
2021 5
2022 10
2023 13
2024 9
2025 4
Total 151
Download as CSV

Tatsuya Kameda publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatsuya Kameda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 118
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tatsuya Kameda D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatsuya Kameda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tatsuya Kameda is affiliated with the University of Tokyo in Japan. Their research primarily spans the field of Social Sciences, with a focus on several subfields that include Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Safety Research.

Their work covers multiple specialized topics such as Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence, Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Complex Network Analysis Techniques, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Cultural Differences and Values, and Language and Cultural Evolution.

Their recent notable papers include:

  • Information aggregation and collective intelligence beyond the wisdom of crowds, 2022, Nature Reviews Psychology
  • The impact of incorrect social information on collective wisdom in human groups, 2020, Journal of The Royal Society Interface
  • Insights about the common generative rule underlying an information foraging task can be facilitated via collective search, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • Convergence of physiological responses to pain during face-to-face interaction, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Majority rule can help solve difficult tasks even when confident members opt out to serve individual interests, 2023, Scientific Reports

Tatsuya Kameda has collaborated frequently with several researchers, notably:

  • Aoi Naito
  • Kiri Kuroda
  • Mayu Takahashi
  • Ryutaro Mori
  • Atsushi Ueshima

Their publications appear often in particular venues, suggesting consistent contributions to these journals and conferences. Key publication venues include:

  • The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association
  • Scientific Reports
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • Research Square
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • The Robust Beauty of Majority Rules in Group Decisions

    Reid Hastie;Tatsuya Kameda

  • Cost–benefit analysis of social/cultural learning in a nonstationary uncertain environment: An evolutionary simulation and an experiment with human subjects

    Tatsuya Kameda;Daisuke Nakanishi

  • Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence : An illustration in a group decision-making context

    Tatsuya Kameda;Yohsuke Ohtsubo;Masanori Takezawa

  • 'Social Sharedness' as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups

    R. Scott Tindale;Tatsuya Kameda

  • Does social/cultural learning increase human adaptability?: Rogers's question revisited

    Tatsuya Kameda;Daisuke Nakanishi

  • The function of the reference point in individual and group risk decision making

    Tatsuya Kameda;James H Davis

  • The Logic of Social Sharing: An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Adaptive Norm Development

    Tatsuya Kameda;Masanori Takezawa;Reid Hastie

  • Detecting affiliation in colaughter across 24 societies

    Gregory A. Bryant;Daniel M. T. Fessler;Riccardo Fusaroli;Edward Clint

  • Psychological entrapment in group decision making : an assigned decision rule and a groupthink phenomenon

    Tatsuya Kameda;Shinkichi Sugimori

  • Social sharing and risk reduction: Exploring a computational algorithm for the psychology of windfall gains

    Tatsuya Kameda;Masanori Takezawa;R.Scott Tindale;Christine M Smith

  • Anxiety, reactivity, and social stress-induced cortisol elevation in humans.

    Taiki Takahashi;Koki Ikeda;Miho Ishikawa;Nozomi Kitamura

  • Social stress-induced cortisol elevation acutely impairs social memory in humans

    Taiki Takahashi;Koki Ikeda;Miho Ishikawa;Takafumi Tsukasaki

  • Procedural influence in small-group decision making: Deliberation style and assigned decision rule.

    Tatsuya Kameda

  • Where Do Social Norms Come From?: The Example of Communal Sharing

    Tatsuya Kameda;Masanori Takezawa;Reid Hastie

  • Evolution, culture, and the human mind.

    Mark Schaller;Ara Norenzayan;Steven J. Heine;Toshio Yamagishi

  • Effects of Assigned Group Consensus Requirement on Group Problem Solving and Group Members' Learning

    Mark F. Stasson;Tatsuya Kameda;Craig D. Parks;Suzi K. Zimmerman

  • Some social mechanics of group decision making: The distribution of opinion, polling sequence, and implications for consensus.

    James H. Davis;Tatsuya Kameda;Craig Parks;Mark Stasson

  • Infectious Diseases and the Evolution of Cross-Cultural Differences

    Mark Schaller;Ara Norenzayan;Steven J. Heine;Toshio Yamagishi

  • Democracy under uncertainty: The wisdom of crowds and the free-rider problem in group decision making

    Tatsuya Kameda;Takafumi Tsukasaki;Reid Hastie;Nathan Berg

  • Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research: Cognitions, Preferences, and Social Sharedness: Past, Present, and Future Directions in Group Decision Making

    Tatsuya Kameda;R. Scott Tindale;James H. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Toshio Yamagishi
Toshio Yamagishi Hitotsubashi University
Steven J. Heine
Steven J. Heine University of British Columbia
Mark Schaller
Mark Schaller University of British Columbia
Ara Norenzayan
Ara Norenzayan University of British Columbia
Reid Hastie
Reid Hastie University of Chicago
Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
R. Scott Tindale
R. Scott Tindale Loyola University Chicago
Katsumi Watanabe
Katsumi Watanabe Waseda University
Norman P. Li
Norman P. Li Singapore Management University
Shanmukh V. Kamble
Shanmukh V. Kamble Karnatak University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens a wide range of career options, particularly in the field of mental health and substance abuse counseling. Many students are drawn to these pathways due to the opportunity to make a meaningful difference in people’s lives. With the rise of flexible online degree programs, it has become easier to start your journey from anywhere in the USA.

Becoming a counselor often requires a specific blend of education, supervised training, and state certification. For example, you can learn more about Long Beach substance abuse counselors education requirements to understand local expectations. If you’re located on the West Coast, check out the substance abuse counselor requirements in Los Angeles.

Requirements vary by region. Those interested in opportunities in the Midwest can read about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Louisville. There are also distinct paths for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Lubbock.

Online psychology degrees can prepare you for these roles and help you meet key licensing criteria. Research programs and local requirements to ensure your educational path aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Tatsuya Kameda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles