World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Chemistry
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 88 2230 2004 61 59 272 61467

Alan E. Mark publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alan E. Mark between 1984 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alan E. Mark published across 41 years, from 1984 to 2024, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2016. 10 of the 289 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2016. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications
1984 2024

289 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alan E. Mark: publications per year, 1984 to 2024
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 2
1991 2
1992 6
1993 5
1994 5
1995 9
1996 3
1997 2
1998 6
1999 12
2000 8
2001 8
2002 15
2003 9
2004 9
2005 15
2006 10
2007 9
2008 9
2009 14
2010 9
2011 13
2012 10
2013 6
2014 14
2015 10
2016 16
2017 7
2018 13
2019 5
2020 5
2021 3
2022 6
2023 5
2024 5
Total 289
Download as CSV

Alan E. Mark publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan E. Mark sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 272 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979 272
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Alan E. Mark D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan E. Mark sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235 88
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Alan E. Mark is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Materials Science, with specific attention to subfields such as Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Molecular Biology, and Physiology.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics and are featured in notable venues. These include:

  • Understanding the Effect of pH on the Solubility and Aggregation Extent of Humic Acid in Solution by Combining Simulation and the Experiment (2022, Environmental Science & Technology)
  • Modelling of the dynamic polarizability of macromolecules for single-molecule optical biosensing (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • Evolution and Morphology of Thin Films Formed by Solvent Evaporation: An Organic Semiconductor Case Study (2020, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces)
  • On the Effect of the Various Assumptions and Approximations used in Molecular Simulations on the Properties of Bio-Molecular Systems: Overview and Perspective on Issues (2020, ChemPhysChem)
  • OFraMP: a fragment-based tool to facilitate the parametrization of large molecules (2023, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Alan E. Mark include Martin Stroet, Shelley Barfoot, Thomas Lee, Paul L. Burn, and David Poger. These collaborators have worked together on multiple publications.

The scientist's work often appears in select publication venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), The Journal of Chemical Physics, arXiv (Cornell University), Environmental Science & Technology, and Scientific Reports.

Alan E. Mark's work spans multiple main topics, including Protein Structure and Dynamics, Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures, Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications, Mechanical and Optical Resonators, Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics, Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research, and Enzyme Structure and Function.

Best Publications

  • GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free

    David Van Der Spoel;Erik Lindahl;Berk Hess;Gerrit Groenhof

  • A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6.

    Chris Oostenbrink;Alessandra Villa;Alan E. Mark;Wilfred F. Van Gunsteren

  • Coarse grained model for semiquantitative lipid simulations

    Siewert Marrink;de Alex Vries;AE Mark

  • Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7

    Nathan Schmid;Andreas P. Eichenberger;Alexandra Choutko;Sereina Riniker

  • Peptide Folding: When Simulation Meets Experiment

    Xavier Daura;Karl Gademann;Bernhard Jaun;Dieter Seebach

  • An Automated Force Field Topology Builder (ATB) and Repository: Version 1.0.

    Alpeshkumar K. Malde;Le Zuo;Matthew Breeze;Martin Stroet

  • The GROMOS Biomolecular Simulation Program Package

    W.R.P. Scott;P.H. Hunenberger;I.G. Tironi;A.E. Mark

  • Avoiding singularities and numerical instabilities in free energy calculations based on molecular simulations

    Thomas C. Beutler;Alan E. Mark;René C. van Schaik;Paul R. Gerber

  • Toroidal pores formed by antimicrobial peptides show significant disorder.

    Durba Sengupta;Hari Leontiadou;Alan E. Mark;Siewert-Jan Marrink

  • Mechanism by which 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol/water mixtures stabilize secondary-structure formation in peptides: A molecular dynamics study

    Danilo Roccatano;Giorgio Colombo;Marco Fioroni;Alan E. Mark

  • Antimicrobial Peptides in Action

    Hari Leontiadou;and Alan E. Mark;Siewert J. Marrink

  • Testing and validation of the Automated Topology Builder (ATB) version 2.0: prediction of hydration free enthalpies.

    Katarzyna B. Koziara;Martin Stroet;Alpeshkumar K. Malde;Alan E. Mark

  • Simulation of pore formation in lipid bilayers by mechanical stress and electric fields

    DP Tieleman;H Leontiadou;AE Mark;Siewert Marrink

  • Parametrization of aliphatic CHn united atoms of GROMOS96 force field

    Xavier Daura;Alan E. Mark;Wilfred F. Van Gunsteren

  • Automated Topology Builder Version 3.0: Prediction of Solvation Free Enthalpies in Water and Hexane

    Martin Stroet;Bertrand Caron;Koen M. Visscher;Daan P. Geerke

  • Fluctuation and Cross-correlation Analysis of Protein Motions Observed in Nanosecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations

    P.H. Hunenberger;A.E. Mark;W.F.van Gunsteren

  • Folding-unfolding thermodynamics of a beta-heptapeptide from equilibrium simulations.

    X. Daura;W.F.van Gunsteren;A.E. Mark

  • Basic ingredients of free energy calculations: a review.

    Clara D. Christ;Alan E. Mark;Wilfred F. van Gunsteren

  • Mechanism of Activation of Protein Kinase JAK2 by the Growth Hormone Receptor

    Andrew J. Brooks;Wei Dai;Megan L. O’Mara;Daniel Abankwa

  • Reversible Peptide Folding in Solution by Molecular Dynamics Simulation

    X. Daura;B. Jaun;D. Seebach;W.F.van Gunsteren

  • The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide

    W.F. Van Gunsteren;S.R. Billeter;A.A. Eising;P.H. Hunenberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Xavier Daura
Xavier Daura Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Siewert J. Marrink
Siewert J. Marrink University of Groningen
Chris Oostenbrink
Chris Oostenbrink BOKU University
Bostjan Kobe
Bostjan Kobe University of Queensland
Glenn F. King
Glenn F. King University of Queensland
Paul L. Burn
Paul L. Burn University of Queensland
Gunnar W. Klau
Gunnar W. Klau Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Paul R. Young
Paul R. Young University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways for students interested in Chemistry and its applications. For those fascinated by the intersection of science and law, careers in forensic science offer a unique opportunity to apply chemical knowledge in solving crimes. Understanding the potential career outcomes is essential before committing to a degree path.

The cost of pursuing a criminal justice degree online is an important consideration for many students. Tuition and fees vary widely, so researching detailed information on cost of criminal justice degree programs can help in making informed financial decisions.

For those seeking a shorter, more affordable degree option, an online associates in criminal justice may be a practical start. This degree can lead to entry-level roles in law enforcement or support positions within the legal system.

Additionally, careers as a paralegal often attract students interested in legal support roles. Understanding the paralegal salary and educational requirements can guide students in choosing the right paralegal degree pathway and maximize their career potential.

Best Scientists Citing Alan E. Mark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles