World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Chemistry
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
88
Citations
61467
World Ranking
2230
National Ranking
61

Alan E. Mark publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan E. Mark sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 272 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Alan E. Mark D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan E. Mark sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Alan E. Mark is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Materials Science, with specific attention to subfields such as Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Molecular Biology, and Physiology.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics and are featured in notable venues. These include:

  • Understanding the Effect of pH on the Solubility and Aggregation Extent of Humic Acid in Solution by Combining Simulation and the Experiment (2022, Environmental Science & Technology)
  • Modelling of the dynamic polarizability of macromolecules for single-molecule optical biosensing (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • Evolution and Morphology of Thin Films Formed by Solvent Evaporation: An Organic Semiconductor Case Study (2020, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces)
  • On the Effect of the Various Assumptions and Approximations used in Molecular Simulations on the Properties of Bio-Molecular Systems: Overview and Perspective on Issues (2020, ChemPhysChem)
  • OFraMP: a fragment-based tool to facilitate the parametrization of large molecules (2023, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Alan E. Mark include Martin Stroet, Shelley Barfoot, Thomas Lee, Paul L. Burn, and David Poger. These collaborators have worked together on multiple publications.

The scientist's work often appears in select publication venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), The Journal of Chemical Physics, arXiv (Cornell University), Environmental Science & Technology, and Scientific Reports.

Alan E. Mark's work spans multiple main topics, including Protein Structure and Dynamics, Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures, Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications, Mechanical and Optical Resonators, Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics, Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research, and Enzyme Structure and Function.

Best Publications

  • GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free

    David Van Der Spoel;Erik Lindahl;Berk Hess;Gerrit Groenhof

  • A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6.

    Chris Oostenbrink;Alessandra Villa;Alan E. Mark;Wilfred F. Van Gunsteren

  • Coarse grained model for semiquantitative lipid simulations

    Siewert Marrink;de Alex Vries;AE Mark

  • Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7

    Nathan Schmid;Andreas P. Eichenberger;Alexandra Choutko;Sereina Riniker

  • Peptide Folding: When Simulation Meets Experiment

    Xavier Daura;Karl Gademann;Bernhard Jaun;Dieter Seebach

  • An Automated Force Field Topology Builder (ATB) and Repository: Version 1.0.

    Alpeshkumar K. Malde;Le Zuo;Matthew Breeze;Martin Stroet

  • The GROMOS Biomolecular Simulation Program Package

    W.R.P. Scott;P.H. Hunenberger;I.G. Tironi;A.E. Mark

  • Avoiding singularities and numerical instabilities in free energy calculations based on molecular simulations

    Thomas C. Beutler;Alan E. Mark;René C. van Schaik;Paul R. Gerber

  • Toroidal pores formed by antimicrobial peptides show significant disorder.

    Durba Sengupta;Hari Leontiadou;Alan E. Mark;Siewert-Jan Marrink

  • Mechanism by which 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol/water mixtures stabilize secondary-structure formation in peptides: A molecular dynamics study

    Danilo Roccatano;Giorgio Colombo;Marco Fioroni;Alan E. Mark

  • Antimicrobial Peptides in Action

    Hari Leontiadou;and Alan E. Mark;Siewert J. Marrink

  • Testing and validation of the Automated Topology Builder (ATB) version 2.0: prediction of hydration free enthalpies.

    Katarzyna B. Koziara;Martin Stroet;Alpeshkumar K. Malde;Alan E. Mark

  • Simulation of pore formation in lipid bilayers by mechanical stress and electric fields

    DP Tieleman;H Leontiadou;AE Mark;Siewert Marrink

  • Parametrization of aliphatic CHn united atoms of GROMOS96 force field

    Xavier Daura;Alan E. Mark;Wilfred F. Van Gunsteren

  • Automated Topology Builder Version 3.0: Prediction of Solvation Free Enthalpies in Water and Hexane

    Martin Stroet;Bertrand Caron;Koen M. Visscher;Daan P. Geerke

  • Fluctuation and Cross-correlation Analysis of Protein Motions Observed in Nanosecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations

    P.H. Hunenberger;A.E. Mark;W.F.van Gunsteren

  • Folding-unfolding thermodynamics of a beta-heptapeptide from equilibrium simulations.

    X. Daura;W.F.van Gunsteren;A.E. Mark

  • Basic ingredients of free energy calculations: a review.

    Clara D. Christ;Alan E. Mark;Wilfred F. van Gunsteren

  • Mechanism of Activation of Protein Kinase JAK2 by the Growth Hormone Receptor

    Andrew J. Brooks;Wei Dai;Megan L. O’Mara;Daniel Abankwa

  • Reversible Peptide Folding in Solution by Molecular Dynamics Simulation

    X. Daura;B. Jaun;D. Seebach;W.F.van Gunsteren

  • The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide

    W.F. Van Gunsteren;S.R. Billeter;A.A. Eising;P.H. Hunenberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Xavier Daura
Xavier Daura Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Siewert J. Marrink
Siewert J. Marrink University of Groningen
Chris Oostenbrink
Chris Oostenbrink BOKU University
Bostjan Kobe
Bostjan Kobe University of Queensland
Glenn F. King
Glenn F. King University of Queensland
Paul L. Burn
Paul L. Burn University of Queensland
Gunnar W. Klau
Gunnar W. Klau Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Paul R. Young
Paul R. Young University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways for students interested in Chemistry and its applications. For those fascinated by the intersection of science and law, careers in forensic science offer a unique opportunity to apply chemical knowledge in solving crimes. Understanding the potential career outcomes is essential before committing to a degree path.

The cost of pursuing a criminal justice degree online is an important consideration for many students. Tuition and fees vary widely, so researching detailed information on cost of criminal justice degree programs can help in making informed financial decisions.

For those seeking a shorter, more affordable degree option, an online associates in criminal justice may be a practical start. This degree can lead to entry-level roles in law enforcement or support positions within the legal system.

Additionally, careers as a paralegal often attract students interested in legal support roles. Understanding the paralegal salary and educational requirements can guide students in choosing the right paralegal degree pathway and maximize their career potential.

Best Scientists Citing Alan E. Mark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles