World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
32172
World Ranking
8977
National Ranking
4621

James M. Hagberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Hagberg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 384 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James M. Hagberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Hagberg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James M. Hagberg is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park, United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus on several interconnected subfields such as Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cancer Research, and Physiology.

Their work concentrates on key scientific topics including:

  • MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Cardiovascular and exercise physiology

James M. Hagberg has collaborated frequently with researchers such as Ryan M. Sapp, Steven J. Prior, William S. Evans, Catherine B. Springer, and Sushant M. Ranadive.

Their recent publications provide insights into various aspects of cardiovascular and molecular physiology. These include:

  • Changes in circulating microRNA and arterial stiffness following high-intensity interval and moderate intensity continuous exercise, 2020, Physiological Reports
  • Race-specific changes in endothelial inflammation and microRNA in response to an acute inflammatory stimulus, 2021, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
  • The unfortunately long life of some retracted biomedical research publications, 2020, Journal of Applied Physiology
  • Circulating microparticle concentrations across acute and chronic cardiovascular disease conditions, 2020, Physiological Reports
  • Circulating MicroRNA Responses to Postprandial Lipemia with or without Prior Exercise, 2021, International Journal of Sports Medicine

Publication venues where James M. Hagberg has contributed multiple works include:

  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (5 publications)
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (4 publications)
  • Physiological Reports (2 publications)
  • American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
  • Journal of Aging and Physical Activity

Best Publications

  • ACSM Position Stand: Exercise and Physical Activity for Older Adults

    Robert S. Mazzeo;Peter Cavanagh;William J. Evans;Maria Fiatarone

  • The human gene map for performance and health-related fitness phenotypes: the 2005 update.

    Molly S. Bray;James M. Hagberg;Louis Pérusse;Tuomo Rankinen

  • Carbohydrate feeding during prolonged strenuous exercise can delay fatigue.

    E. F. Coyle;J. M. Hagberg;B. F. Hurley;W. H. Martin

  • Muscle triglyceride utilization during exercise: effect of training

    B. F. Hurley;P. M. Nemeth;W. H. Martin;J. M. Hagberg

  • A physiological comparison of young and older endurance athletes.

    G. W. Heath;J. M. Hagberg;A. A. Ehsani;J. O. Holloszy

  • The role of exercise training in the treatment of hypertension: an update.

    James M. Hagberg;Jung-Jun Park;Michael D. Brown

  • Endurance training in older men and women. I. Cardiovascular responses to exercise

    D. R. Seals;J. M. Hagberg;B. F. Hurley;A. A. Ehsani

  • Effect of exercise training in 60- to 69-year-old persons with essential hypertension.

    James M. Hagberg;Scott J. Montain;Wade H. Martin;Ali A. Ehsani

  • Time course of loss of adaptations after stopping prolonged intense endurance training

    E. F. Coyle;W. H. Martin;D. R. Sinacore;M. J. Joyner

  • Effects of exercise and lack of exercise on glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity

    G. W. Heath;J. R. Gavin;J. M. Hinderliter;J. M. Hagberg

  • Decline in Vo2max with aging in master athletes and sedentary men

    M. A. Rogers;J. M. Hagberg;W. H. Martin;A. A. Ehsani

  • Strength training increases regional bone mineral density and bone remodeling in middle-aged and older men.

    A. Menkes;S. Mazel;R. A. Redmond;K. Koffler

  • Rapid changes in left ventricular dimensions and mass in response to physical conditioning and deconditioning.

    Ali A. Ehsani;James M. Hagberg;Robert C. Hickson

  • Faster adjustment to and recovery from submaximal exercise in the trained state

    J. M. Hagberg;R. C. Hickson;A. A. Ehsani;J. O. Holloszy

  • Adverse metabolic response to regular exercise: Is it a rare or common occurrence?

    Claude Bouchard;Steven N. Blair;Timothy S. Church;Conrad P. Earnest

  • Cardiovascular responses of 70- to 79-yr-old men and women to exercise training

    J. M. Hagberg;J. E. Graves;M. Limacher;D. R. Woods

  • Resistive training can reduce coronary risk factors without altering VO2max or percent body fat.

    B F Hurley;J M Hagberg;A P Goldberg;D R Seals

  • Effect of endurance training on plasma free fatty acid turnover and oxidation during exercise.

    W. H. Martin rd;G. P. Dalsky;B. F. Hurley;D. E. Matthews

  • Injuries and adherence to walk/jog and resistance training programs in the elderly.

    Michael L. Pollock;Joan F. Carroll;James E. Graves;Scott H. Leggett

  • Effects of Endurance Training on Glucose Tolerance and Plasma Lipid Levels in Older Men and Women

    Douglas R. Seals;James M. Hagberg;Ben F. Hurley;Ali A. Ehsani

Frequent Co-Authors

Ali A. Ehsani
Ali A. Ehsani Washington University in St. Louis
John O. Holloszy
John O. Holloszy Washington University in St. Louis
Robert E. Ferrell
Robert E. Ferrell University of Pittsburgh
Ben F. Hurley
Ben F. Hurley University of Maryland, College Park
Douglas R. Seals
Douglas R. Seals University of Colorado Boulder
Claude Bouchard
Claude Bouchard Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Alan R. Shuldiner
Alan R. Shuldiner University of Maryland, Baltimore
Michael Brown
Michael Brown University of Maryland, College Park
Edward F. Coyle
Edward F. Coyle The University of Texas at Austin
Tuomo Rankinen
Tuomo Rankinen Pennington Biomedical Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in a medical career but seeking flexible study options, online degrees can be a smart choice. Many reputable institutions now offer accredited online programs that prepare students for critical roles in healthcare. For aspiring advanced practice nurses, there are most affordable dnp programs available, letting you earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice without breaking the bank.

If pharmacy interests you, consider top-ranked remote programs like the best online pharmacy school options. These allow students to balance studies with work or family obligations. Health information management is another fast-growing field; you can explore earning an online bachelor's in health information management to launch a data-driven career in the healthcare sector.

For those looking for a quicker path into the industry, medical billing and coding is in high demand. Wondering how much does it cost to become a medical coder? Online programs typically offer affordable and flexible pathways to certification, helping you start your healthcare journey sooner.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Hagberg

Trending Scientists