World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 90 2028 1819 741 615 550 76453

Jeremy C. Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeremy C. Smith between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeremy C. Smith published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 15.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2023. 50 of the 717 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2023. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 33 publications 2012: 33 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 46 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 24 publications
1981 2025

717 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeremy C. Smith: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 1
1986 2
1987 2
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 3
1992 5
1993 9
1994 12
1995 11
1996 9
1997 18
1998 14
1999 8
2000 11
2001 5
2002 13
2003 19
2004 15
2005 30
2006 23
2007 18
2008 21
2009 22
2010 27
2011 33
2012 33
2013 29
2014 25
2015 18
2016 28
2017 19
2018 28
2019 27
2020 36
2021 18
2022 23
2023 46
2024 26
2025 24
Total 717
Download as CSV

Jeremy C. Smith publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy C. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 550 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148 550
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeremy C. Smith D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy C. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185 90
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeremy C. Smith is affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a substantial focus on Molecular Biology as a subfield. Additional subfields of study include Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Spectroscopy.

Their work covers several main topics including:

  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

Jeremy C. Smith has contributed to numerous scientific publications, frequently appearing in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biophysical Journal, arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, and Green Chemistry.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Supercomputer-Based Ensemble Docking Drug Discovery Pipeline with Application to Covid-19" (2020), published in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • "How to Discover Antiviral Drugs Quickly" (2020), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Full structural ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins from unbiased molecular dynamics simulations" (2021), published in Communications Biology
  • "Mathematical model of a proton-exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell" (2021), published in International Journal of Thermofluids
  • "Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Structures, Dynamics, and Aggregation of Dissolved Organic Matter" (2020), published in Environmental Science & Technology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jeremy C. Smith include:

  • Micholas Dean Smith
  • Loukas Petridis
  • Rupesh Agarwal
  • Jerry M. Parks
  • Mood Mohan

Best Publications

  • GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers

    Mark James Abraham;Teemu Murtola;Roland Schulz;Roland Schulz;Szilárd Páll

  • All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins.

    A. D. MacKerell;D. Bashford;M. Bellott;R. L. Dunbrack

  • GROMACS 4.5

    Sander Pronk;Szilárd Páll;Szilárd Páll;Roland Schulz;Roland Schulz;Per Larsson

  • The Genetic Basis for Bacterial Mercury Methylation

    Jerry M. Parks;Alexander Johs;Mircea Podar;Mircea Podar;Romain Bridou

  • Is the first hydration shell of lysozyme of higher density than bulk water

    Franci Merzel;Jeremy C. Smith

  • Hierarchical analysis of conformational dynamics in biomolecules: Transition networks of metastable states

    Frank Noé;Illia Horenko;Christof Schütte;Jeremy C. Smith

  • Ensemble Docking in Drug Discovery.

    Rommie E. Amaro;Jerome Baudry;John Chodera;Özlem Demir

  • THE ROLE OF DYNAMICS IN ENZYME ACTIVITY

    Roy M. Daniel;Rachel V. Dunn;John L. Finney;Jeremy C. Smith

  • Protein dynamics: comparison of simulations with inelastic neutron scattering experiments.

    J. C. Smith

  • Thermodynamic stability of water molecules in the bacteriorhodopsin proton channel: a molecular dynamics free energy perturbation study

    B. Roux;M. Nina;R. Pomès;J.C. Smith

  • Dual function of the hydration layer around an antifreeze protein revealed by atomistic molecular dynamics simulations.

    David R. Nutt;Jeremy C. Smith

  • Translational hydration water dynamics drives the protein glass transition.

    Alexander L. Tournier;Jiancong Xu;Jeremy C. Smith

  • Membrane Protein Structure, Function, and Dynamics: a Perspective from Experiments and Theory

    Zoe Cournia;Toby W. Allen;Toby W. Allen;Ioan Andricioaei;Bruno Antonny

  • Repurposing Therapeutics for COVID-19: Supercomputer-Based Docking to the SARS-CoV-2 Viral Spike Protein and Viral Spike Protein-Human ACE2 Interface

    Micholas Smith;Jeremy C. Smith

  • Mechanism of lignin inhibition of enzymatic biomass deconstruction

    Josh V. Vermaas;Loukas Petridis;Xianghong Qi;Roland Schulz;Roland Schulz

  • A model for the photosystem II reaction center core including the structure of the primary donor P680.

    Bengt Svensson;Catherine Etchebest;Pierre Tuffery;Paul van Kan

  • Common processes drive the thermochemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass

    Paul Langan;Paul Langan;Loukas Petridis;Loukas Petridis;Hugh M. O'Neill;Sai Venkatesh Pingali

  • Mutant alcohol dehydrogenase leads to improved ethanol tolerance in Clostridium thermocellum

    Steven D Brown;Adam M Guss;Tatiana Karpinets;Jerry M Parks

  • Principal components of the protein dynamical transition.

    Alexander L. Tournier;Jeremy C. Smith

  • Structural mechanism of the recovery stroke in the myosin molecular motor.

    Stefan Fischer;Björn Windshügel;Daniel Horak;Kenneth C. Holmes

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugh O'Neill
Hugh O'Neill Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Roy M. Daniel
Roy M. Daniel University of Waikato
Benoît Roux
Benoît Roux University of Chicago
Paul Langan
Paul Langan Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Martin Karplus
Martin Karplus Harvard University
Arthur J. Ragauskas
Arthur J. Ragauskas University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Stephen Cusack
Stephen Cusack European Bioinformatics Institute
Brian H. Davison
Brian H. Davison Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Marcus Elstner
Marcus Elstner Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Alexei P. Sokolov
Alexei P. Sokolov University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various specialized fields, including forensic science. Those interested in applying chemical knowledge to criminal investigations often consider pursuing forensic psychology graduate programs online. These programs combine scientific analysis with psychology, enhancing skills valuable in solving crimes.

For students looking beyond psychology, exploring careers in the broader field of careers in forensics can offer diverse opportunities. Chemistry graduates often find roles in forensic laboratories, crime scene analysis, or evidence examination, emphasizing the interdisciplinary nature of this profession.

Cost is an important factor when selecting a program. Prospective students should carefully review the criminal justice degree price to find affordable education paths that fit their budget while meeting their career goals.

For those at the beginning of their academic journey, the best online associate degree programs in criminal justice offer solid foundations. These associate degrees can act as stepping stones towards advanced roles in forensic and chemical sciences applied within the justice system.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremy C. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles