World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven R. Steinhubl

Steven R. Steinhubl

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 12945 12184 6618 6122 426 39600

Steven R. Steinhubl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven R. Steinhubl between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven R. Steinhubl published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 14.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2006. 18 of the 456 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2006. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 25 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 31 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 2 publications
1996 2026

456 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven R. Steinhubl: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 2
1998 3
1999 5
2000 7
2001 9
2002 10
2003 25
2004 25
2005 14
2006 31
2007 28
2008 24
2009 19
2010 22
2011 16
2012 15
2013 12
2014 10
2015 18
2016 22
2017 18
2018 21
2019 21
2020 12
2021 19
2022 10
2023 7
2024 11
2025 16
2026 2
Total 456
Download as CSV

Steven R. Steinhubl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven R. Steinhubl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 426 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 426
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven R. Steinhubl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven R. Steinhubl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Steven R. Steinhubl is affiliated with Scripps Health in the United States and has a significant research footprint in the field of medicine, particularly focusing on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their recent published works include research on the integration of wearable technology and health data to improve disease detection and monitoring. Notable papers include:

  • "Wearable sensor data and self-reported symptoms for COVID-19 detection," 2020, published in Nature Medicine
  • "Harnessing wearable device data to improve state-level real-time surveillance of influenza-like illness in the USA: a population-based study," 2020, published in The Lancet Digital Health
  • "Digitizing clinical trials," 2020, published in npj Digital Medicine
  • "The All of Us Research Program: Data quality, utility, and diversity," 2022, published in Patterns
  • "Inter- and intraindividual variability in daily resting heart rate and its associations with age, sex, sleep, BMI, and time of year: Retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of 92,457 adults," 2020, published in PLoS ONE

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Steinhubl include:

  • Giorgio Quer
  • Matteo Gadaleta
  • Katie Baca-Motes
  • Eric J. Topol
  • Jennifer M. Radin

Steven R. Steinhubl's frequent publication venues reflect a focus on cardiovascular medicine and digital health technologies, with multiple publications in:

  • Circulation
  • npj Digital Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Lancet Digital Health
  • Physiology

Their main fields of study are centered around medicine, with a specialized concentration in:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Epidemiology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Topics extensively covered in their body of research include:

  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Best Publications

  • Clopidogrel and Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone for the Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events

    Deepak L. Bhatt;Keith A.A. Fox;Werner Hacke;Peter B. Berger

  • Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

    Steven R. Steinhubl;Peter B. Berger;J. Tift Mann;Edward T. A. Fry

  • Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial.

    James J Ferguson;Robert M Califf;Elliott M Antman;Marc Cohen

  • Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals.

    Victor L. Serebruany;Steven R. Steinhubl;Peter B. Berger;Alex I. Malinin

  • Patients with prior myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the CHARISMA trial

    Deepak L. Bhatt;Marcus D. Flather;Werner Hacke;Peter B. Berger

  • The emerging field of mobile health

    Steven R. Steinhubl;Evan D. Muse;Eric J. Topol

  • 2017 Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint Definitions for Clinical Trials.

    Karen A. Hicks;Kenneth W. Mahaffey;Roxana Mehran;Steven E. Nissen

  • Platelet function monitoring in patients with coronary artery disease

    Paul A. Gurbel;Richard C. Becker;Kenneth G. Mann;Steven R. Steinhubl

  • Aspirin dose for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.

    Charles L. Campbell;Susan Smyth;Gilles Montalescot;Steven R. Steinhubl

  • Screening for Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration

    Ben Freedman;John Camm;Hugh Calkins;Jeffrey S Healey

  • Can Mobile Health Technologies Transform Health Care

    Steven R. Steinhubl;Evan D. Muse;Eric J. Topol

  • Why have antioxidants failed in clinical trials

    Steven R. Steinhubl

  • Point-of-Care Measured Platelet Inhibition Correlates With a Reduced Risk of an Adverse Cardiac Event After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Results of the GOLD (AU-Assessing Ultegra) Multicenter Study

    Steven R. Steinhubl;J. David Talley;Gregory A. Braden;James E. Tcheng

  • Effect of rimonabant on progression of atherosclerosis in patients with abdominal obesity and coronary artery disease: The STRADIVARIUS randomized controlled trial

    Steven E. Nissen;Stephen J. Nicholls;Kathy Wolski;Josep Rodés-Cabau

  • Analysis of risk of bleeding complications after different doses of aspirin in 192,036 patients enrolled in 31 randomized controlled trials.

    Victor L. Serebruany;Steven R. Steinhubl;Peter B. Berger;Alex I. Malinin

  • Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

    Gilles Montalescot;Harvey D. White;Richard Gallo;Marc Cohen

  • Effect of a Home-Based Wearable Continuous ECG Monitoring Patch on Detection of Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation: The mSToPS Randomized Clinical Trial

    Steven R. Steinhubl;Jill Waalen;Alison M. Edwards;Lauren M. Ariniello

  • Lack of Adverse Clopidogrel–Atorvastatin Clinical Interaction From Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clopidogrel Trial

    Jacqueline Saw;Steven R. Steinhubl;Peter B. Berger;Dean J. Kereiakes

  • Wearable sensor data and self-reported symptoms for COVID-19 detection.

    Giorgio Quer;Jennifer M. Radin;Matteo Gadaleta;Katie Baca-Motes

  • Rapid Platelet-Function Assay An Automated and Quantitative Cartridge-Based Method

    Jeffrey W. Smith;Steven R. Steinhubl;A. Michael Lincoff;Jacqueline C. Coleman

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric J. Topol
Eric J. Topol Scripps Research Institute
Peter B. Berger
Peter B. Berger Duke University
Deepak L. Bhatt
Deepak L. Bhatt Mount Sinai Hospital
Gilles Montalescot
Gilles Montalescot Baim Institute for Clinical Research
A. Michael Lincoff
A. Michael Lincoff Cleveland Clinic
David J. Moliterno
David J. Moliterno University of Kentucky
Keith A.A. Fox
Keith A.A. Fox University of Edinburgh
Richard C. Becker
Richard C. Becker University of Cincinnati
Harvey D. White
Harvey D. White Auckland City Hospital
S. Claiborne Johnston
S. Claiborne Johnston The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens doors to several rewarding online degrees and health career pathways. For those interested in patient care but seeking flexibility, consider enrolling in a nursing school that doesn't require teas. These programs allow you to start nursing education without additional admission exams, making the process more accessible.

Healthcare leadership roles are also in demand. An online healthcare administration associate degree online can equip you with the skills needed for health services management and support roles, all from a distance.

Registered nurses aspiring to advanced practice can benefit from asn to fnp bridge programs. These pathways fast-track your journey from an associate degree to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner, increasing your scope of practice and earning potential.

If nutrition and wellness appeal to you, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition can lead to careers in community health, dietetics, and wellness coaching.

Each pathway offers unique opportunities for those passionate about healthcare, whether working directly with patients or supporting them behind the scenes.

Best Scientists Citing Steven R. Steinhubl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles