World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Udaya S. Tantry publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Udaya S. Tantry sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Udaya S. Tantry D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Udaya S. Tantry sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Udaya S. Tantry is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their work spans several main research areas, including antiplatelet therapy and cardiovascular diseases, venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, acute myocardial infarction research, COVID-19 clinical research studies, coronary interventions and diagnostics, and lipoproteins and cardiovascular health.

The scientist's notable recent papers cover a range of topics in cardiovascular and thrombotic research. Key publications include:

  • "The East Asian Paradox: An Updated Position Statement on the Challenges to the Current Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease" (2020) published in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • "Current and novel biomarkers of thrombotic risk in COVID-19: a Consensus Statement from the International COVID-19 Thrombosis Biomarkers Colloquium" (2022) published in Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • "Quantification of antibody avidities and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in serum and saliva on plasmonic substrates" (2020) published in Nature Biomedical Engineering
  • "PCSK9 Inhibition During the Inflammatory Stage of SARS-CoV-2 Infection" (2023) published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Targeted pharmacotherapy for ischemia reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction" (2020) published in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

Frequent collaborators of Udaya S. Tantry include Paul A. Gurbel, Kevin P. Bliden, Sahib Singh, Young-Hoon Jeong, and Rahul Chaudhary. These coauthors have contributed to numerous collective research projects and publications over time.

Udaya S. Tantry's research output is frequently published in leading cardiovascular and thrombosis journals. The most common publication venues are:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Their contributions are distributed across subfields such as cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, internal medicine, infectious diseases, and epidemiology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach within medical research.

Best Publications

  • Association of Cytochrome P450 2C19 Genotype With the Antiplatelet Effect and Clinical Efficacy of Clopidogrel Therapy

    Alan R. Shuldiner;Jeffrey R. O’Connell;Kevin P. Bliden;Amish Gandhi

  • Randomized Double-Blind Assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the Antiplatelet Effects of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease The ONSET/OFFSET Study

    Paul A. Gurbel;Kevin P. Bliden;Kathleen Butler;Udaya S. Tantry

  • Consensus and Future Directions on the Definition of High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity to Adenosine Diphosphate

    Laurent Bonello;Udaya S. Tantry;Rossella Marcucci;Ruediger Blindt

  • Consensus and Update on the Definition of On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity to Adenosine Diphosphate Associated With Ischemia and Bleeding

    Udaya S. Tantry;Laurent Bonello;Daniel Aradi;Matthew J. Price

  • Platelet reactivity in patients and recurrent events post-stenting: results of the PREPARE POST-STENTING Study.

    Paul A. Gurbel;Kevin P. Bliden;Kirk Guyer;Peter W. Cho

  • Clopidogrel effect on platelet reactivity in patients with stent thrombosis: results of the CREST Study.

    Paul A. Gurbel;Kevin P. Bliden;Waiel Samara;Jason A. Yoho

  • Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies: the RESPOND study.

    Paul A. Gurbel;Kevin P. Bliden;Kathleen Butler;Mark J. Antonino

  • Evaluation of Dose-Related Effects of Aspirin on Platelet Function Results From the Aspirin-Induced Platelet Effect (ASPECT) Study

    Paul A. Gurbel;Kevin P. Bliden;Joseph DiChiara;Justin Newcomer

  • Increased Risk in Patients With High Platelet Aggregation Receiving Chronic Clopidogrel Therapy Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is the Current Antiplatelet Therapy Adequate?

    Kevin P. Bliden;Joseph DiChiara;Udaya S. Tantry;Ashwani K. Bassi

  • The Relation of Dosing to Clopidogrel Responsiveness and the Incidence of High Post-Treatment Platelet Aggregation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stenting

    Paul A. Gurbel;Kevin P. Bliden;Kevin M. Hayes;Jason A. Yoho

  • Effects of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Antibodies in Adults With Hypercholesterolemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Eliano Pio Navarese;Michalina Kołodziejczak;Volker Schulze;Paul A. Gurbel

  • Updated Expert Consensus Statement on Platelet Function and Genetic Testing for Guiding P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Treatment in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Dirk Sibbing;Daniel Aradi;Dimitrios Alexopoulos;Jurrien ten Berg

  • Clopidogrel Loading With Eptifibatide to Arrest the Reactivity of Platelets: Results of the Clopidogrel Loading With Eptifibatide to Arrest the Reactivity of Platelets (CLEAR PLATELETS) Study

    Paul A. Gurbel;Kevin P. Bliden;Kazi A. Zaman;Jason A. Yoho

  • Association Between Baseline LDL-C Level and Total and Cardiovascular Mortality After LDL-C Lowering: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Eliano P Navarese;Jennifer G Robinson;Mariusz Kowalewski;Michalina Kolodziejczak

  • Overestimation of platelet aspirin resistance detection by thrombelastograph platelet mapping and validation by conventional aggregometry using arachidonic acid stimulation.

    Udaya S. Tantry;Kevin P. Bliden;Paul A. Gurbel

  • Bleeding and stent thrombosis on P2Y12-inhibitors: collaborative analysis on the role of platelet reactivity for risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention

    Dániel Aradi;Ajay Kirtane;Laurent Bonello;Paul A. Gurbel

  • International Expert Consensus on Switching Platelet P2Y12 Receptor-Inhibiting Therapies

    Dominick J. Angiolillo;Fabiana Rollini;Robert F. Storey;Deepak L. Bhatt

  • Nitric oxide regulates wound healing.

    Michael R. Schäffer;Udaya Tantry;Steven S. Gross;Hannah L. Wasserkrug

  • Platelet Function Measurement–Based Strategy to Reduce Bleeding and Waiting Time in Clopidogrel-Treated Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery The Timing Based on Platelet Function Strategy to Reduce Clopidogrel-Associated Bleeding Related to CABG (TARGET-CABG) Study

    Elisabeth Mahla;Thomas A. Suarez;Kevin P. Bliden;Peter Rehak

  • Diabetes-impaired healing and reduced wound nitric oxide synthesis: a possible pathophysiologic correlation.

    Michael R Schäffer;Udaya Tantry;Philip A Efron;Gretchen M Ahrendt

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. Gurbel
Paul A. Gurbel Inova Fairfax Hospital
Dean J. Kereiakes
Dean J. Kereiakes The Christ Hospital Health Network
Robert F. Storey
Robert F. Storey University of Sheffield
Alan R. Shuldiner
Alan R. Shuldiner University of Maryland, Baltimore
Dominick J. Angiolillo
Dominick J. Angiolillo University of Florida
Stefan James
Stefan James Uppsala University
Ron Waksman
Ron Waksman MedStar Washington Hospital Center
David Erlinge
David Erlinge Lund University
Andrzej Budaj
Andrzej Budaj Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Grochowski Hospital
Jurriën M. ten Berg
Jurriën M. ten Berg Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in studying Medicine in the USA are also eager to explore online opportunities and flexible pathways in healthcare. Whether you’re a career changer, an RN seeking advancement, or new to the industry, there are degrees and certifications available to match your goals.

Nurses looking to expand their qualifications might consider the online phd nursing programs, which can lead to leadership roles, academic careers, and advanced clinical positions. If affordability is a priority, the cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs provide a cost-effective way for registered nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree and open up more opportunities.

For those without a nursing background, direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online allow motivated students to transition into healthcare quickly, even if their undergraduate degree is in another field. Additionally, if you’re looking for quicker admission into the nursing field, exploring the easiest rn program can help you get started in healthcare sooner.

By considering these online pathways, students can find flexible, affordable, and efficient routes to fulfilling medical and healthcare careers in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Udaya S. Tantry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles