World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
44841
World Ranking
13861
National Ranking
527

Jurriën M. ten Berg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jurriën M. ten Berg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 521 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jurriën M. ten Berg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jurriën M. ten Berg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).

    Marco Valgimigli;Héctor Bueno;Robert A Byrne;Jean-Philippe Collet

  • Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial

    Willem J. M. Dewilde;Tom Oirbans;Freek W. A. Verheugt;Johannes C. Kelder

  • Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with Dabigatran after PCI in Atrial Fibrillation.

    Christopher P. Cannon;Deepak L. Bhatt;Jonas Oldgren;Gregory Y.H. Lip

  • Comparison of Platelet Function Tests in Predicting Clinical Outcome in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stent Implantation

    Nicoline J. Breet;Jochem W. van Werkum;Heleen J. Bouman;Johannes C. Kelder

  • Consensus and Update on the Definition of On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity to Adenosine Diphosphate Associated With Ischemia and Bleeding

    Udaya S. Tantry;Laurent Bonello;Daniel Aradi;Matthew J. Price

  • Predictors of coronary stent thrombosis: the Dutch Stent Thrombosis Registry.

    Jochem W. van Werkum;Antonius A. Heestermans;A. Carla Zomer;Johannes C. Kelder

  • Abciximab in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Clopidogrel Pretreatment: The ISAR-REACT 2 Randomized Trial

    Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Franz-Josef Neumann;Franz Dotzer

  • Pretreatment with Prasugrel in Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Gilles Montalescot;Leonardo Bolognese;Dariusz Dudek;Patrick Goldstein

  • Prehospital initiation of tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty (On-TIME 2): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial

    Arnoud Wj van't Hof;Jurriën ten Berg;Ton Heestermans;Thorsten Dill

  • Paraoxonase-1 is a major determinant of clopidogrel efficacy

    Heleen J Bouman;Edgar Schömig;Jochem W van Werkum;Janna Velder

  • A clinical trial of abciximab in elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with clopidogrel.

    Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Helmut Schühlen;Josef Dirschinger

  • Bivalirudin Started during Emergency Transport for Primary PCI

    Philippe Gabriel Steg;Christian W. Hamm;Peter Clemmensen;Frédéric Lapostolle

  • Updated Expert Consensus Statement on Platelet Function and Genetic Testing for Guiding P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Treatment in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Dirk Sibbing;Daniel Aradi;Dimitrios Alexopoulos;Jurrien ten Berg

  • Impact of platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. A collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data.

    Somjot S. Brar;Jurrien ten Berg;Rossella Marcucci;Matthew J. Price

  • Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary or valve interventions: a joint consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and European Association of Acute Cardiac Care (ACCA) endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)

    Gregory Y H Lip;Stephan Windecker;Kurt Huber;Paulus Kirchhof

  • Bleeding and stent thrombosis on P2Y12-inhibitors: collaborative analysis on the role of platelet reactivity for risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention

    Dániel Aradi;Ajay Kirtane;Laurent Bonello;Paul A. Gurbel

  • ISAR-SAFE: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6 vs. 12 months of clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stenting.

    Stefanie Schulz-Schüpke;Robert A Byrne;Jurrien M Ten Berg;Franz-Josef Neumann

  • Impact of CYP2C19 variant genotypes on clinical efficacy of antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Tim Bauer;Heleen J Bouman;Jochem W van Werkum;Neville F Ford

  • Intracoronary infusion of mononuclear cells from bone marrow or peripheral blood compared with standard therapy in patients after acute myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the randomized controlled HEBE trial

    Alexander Hirsch;Robin Nijveldt;Pieter A. van der Vleuten;Jan G.P. Tijssen

  • Aspirin with or without Clopidogrel after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation

    Jorn Brouwer;Vincent J Nijenhuis;Ronak Delewi;Renicus S Hermanides

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian W. Hamm
Christian W. Hamm University of Giessen
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Gregory Y.H. Lip University of Liverpool
Freek W.A. Verheugt
Freek W.A. Verheugt University Medical Centre Mannheim
Deepak L. Bhatt
Deepak L. Bhatt Mount Sinai Hospital
Christopher P. Cannon
Christopher P. Cannon Brigham and Women's Hospital
Adnan Kastrati
Adnan Kastrati Technical University of Munich
Robert F. Storey
Robert F. Storey University of Sheffield
Franz-Josef Neumann
Franz-Josef Neumann University of Freiburg
Philippe Gabriel Steg
Philippe Gabriel Steg Université Paris Cité
Uwe Zeymer
Uwe Zeymer University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in pursuing a career in medicine or healthcare, several flexible online options can prepare you for rewarding roles beyond becoming a physician. Supportive fields like medical billing and coding financial aid programs offer accessible entry points, allowing you to learn essential administrative skills while exploring scholarships and grants.

For those leaning toward patient care, nursing is a top choice. Not all nursing programs require standardized entrance tests—learn more about the options in our article, do all nursing schools require the teas. Accelerated options are also available, such as an accelerated healthcare administration degree, which can help launch your career in hospital or clinic management much earlier.

Registered nurses looking to advance may benefit from bridge programs. Consider exploring adn to np programs online, which streamline the journey from associate-level RN to advanced nurse practitioner. Each of these pathways can be pursued fully or partially online, giving you the flexibility to balance study with work or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Jurriën M. ten Berg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles