World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5487 5097 2992 2714 233 8429

Rebecca L. Koscik publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rebecca L. Koscik between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rebecca L. Koscik published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2017. 17 of the 320 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2017. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 16 publications
1994 2025

320 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rebecca L. Koscik: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 3
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 2
2005 7
2006 5
2007 0
2008 3
2009 2
2010 4
2011 6
2012 6
2013 10
2014 19
2015 26
2016 23
2017 32
2018 26
2019 31
2020 26
2021 21
2022 31
2023 16
2024 1
2025 16
Total 320
Download as CSV

Rebecca L. Koscik publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca L. Koscik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 233 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 233
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rebecca L. Koscik D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca L. Koscik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rebecca L. Koscik is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medicine, with significant contributions to the fields of psychiatry and mental health, physiology, cognitive neuroscience, molecular biology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine. The main topics of their work include dementia and cognitive impairment research, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, health disparities and outcomes, health, environment, and cognitive aging, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, and blood pressure and hypertension studies.

They have an extensive publication record, with a number of recent papers addressing various aspects of Alzheimer's disease and cognitive decline. Some significant recent publications include:

  • Differential roles of Aβ42/40, p-tau231 and p-tau217 for Alzheimer's trial selection and disease monitoring, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • Multi-method investigation of factors influencing amyloid onset and impairment in three cohorts, 2022, Brain
  • Association of Age at Menopause and Hormone Therapy Use With Tau and β-Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography, 2023, JAMA Neurology
  • Association of Neighborhood Context, Cognitive Decline, and Cortical Change in an Unimpaired Cohort, 2021, Neurology
  • The Area Deprivation Index: A novel tool for harmonizable risk assessment in Alzheimer's disease research, 2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Sterling C. Johnson, Erin M. Jonaitis, Tobey J. Betthauser, Nathaniel A. Chin, and Bradley T. Christian.

Their work appears regularly in several academic venues such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Journal of Neuropsychology

Best Publications

  • Apolipoprotein E Genotype and Sex Risk Factors for Alzheimer Disease: A Meta-analysis

    Scott C. Neu;Judy Pa;Walter Kukull;Duane Beekly

  • Association of Insulin Resistance With Cerebral Glucose Uptake in Late Middle–Aged Adults at Risk for Alzheimer Disease

    Auriel A. Willette;Barbara B. Bendlin;Erika J. Starks;Alex C. Birdsill

  • The Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention: A review of findings and current directions.

    Sterling C. Johnson;Rebecca L. Koscik;Erin M. Jonaitis;Lindsay R. Clark

  • Insulin resistance predicts brain amyloid deposition in late middle-aged adults.

    Auriel A. Willette;Auriel A. Willette;Sterling C. Johnson;Alex C. Birdsill;Mark A. Sager

  • Physical activity attenuates age-related biomarker alterations in preclinical AD

    Ozioma C. Okonkwo;Stephanie A. Schultz;Jennifer M. Oh;Jordan Larson

  • Amyloid burden is associated with self-reported sleep in nondemented late middle-aged adults

    Kate E. Sprecher;Barbara B. Bendlin;Annie M. Racine;Ozioma C. Okonkwo

  • Poor sleep is associated with CSF biomarkers of amyloid pathology in cognitively normal adults.

    Kate E. Sprecher;Rebecca L. Koscik;Cynthia M. Carlsson;Henrik Zetterberg

  • Psychosocial risk associated with newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: parents' experience while awaiting the sweat-test appointment

    Audrey Tluczek;Rebecca L Koscik;Philip M Farrell;Michael J Rock

  • Cognitive function of children with cystic fibrosis: deleterious effect of early malnutrition.

    Rebecca L. Koscik;Philip M. Farrell;Michael R. Kosorok;Kathleen M. Zaremba

  • Longitudinal plasma metabolomics of aging and sex.

    Burcu F. Darst;Rebecca L. Koscik;Kirk J. Hogan;Sterling C. Johnson

  • Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Wisconsin: Comparison of biochemical and molecular methods

    Ronald G. Gregg;Amy Simantel;Philip M. Farrell;Rebecca Koscik

  • Amyloid and tau imaging biomarkers explain cognitive decline from late middle-age

    Tobey J Betthauser;Rebecca L Koscik;Erin M Jonaitis;Samantha L Allison

  • Low cerebral blood flow is associated with lower memory function in metabolic syndrome.

    Alex C. Birdsill;Cynthia M. Carlsson;Auriel A. Willette;Ozioma C. Okonkwo

  • Occupational Complexity and Cognitive Reserve in a Middle-Aged Cohort at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

    Elizabeth A. Boots;Stephanie A. Schultz;Rodrigo P. Almeida;Jennifer M. Oh

  • Pathway-Specific Polygenic Risk Scores as Predictors of Amyloid-β Deposition and Cognitive Function in a Sample at Increased Risk for Alzheimer's Disease.

    Burcu F Darst;Rebecca L Koscik;Annie M Racine;Jennifer M Oh

  • Regional white matter hyperintensities: aging, Alzheimer's disease risk, and cognitive function

    Alex C. Birdsill;Rebecca L. Koscik;Erin M. Jonaitis;Sterling C. Johnson

  • The effect of TOMM40 poly-T length on gray matter volume and cognition in middle-aged persons with APOE ε3/ε3 genotype.

    Sterling C. Johnson;Asenath La Rue;Bruce P. Hermann;Guofan Xu

  • Measuring longitudinal cognition: Individual tests versus composites

    Erin M. Jonaitis;Rebecca L. Koscik;Lindsay R. Clark;Yue Ma

  • Subjective memory complaints, cortical thinning, and cognitive dysfunction in middle-age adults at risk of AD

    Stephanie A. Schultz;Jennifer M. Oh;Rebecca L. Koscik;N. Maritza Dowling

  • Cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with brain structure, cognition, and mood in a middle-aged cohort at risk for Alzheimer's disease.

    Elizabeth A. Boots;Stephanie A. Schultz;Jennifer M. Oh;Jordan Larson

  • Effects of Simvastatin on Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers and Cognition in Middle-Aged Adults at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

    Cynthia M. Carlsson;Cynthia M. Carlsson;Carey E. Gleason;Carey E. Gleason;Timothy M. Hess;Kimberly A. Moreland

Frequent Co-Authors

Sterling C. Johnson
Sterling C. Johnson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Sanjay Asthana
Sanjay Asthana University of Wisconsin–Madison
Mark A. Sager
Mark A. Sager University of Wisconsin–Madison
Bruce P. Hermann
Bruce P. Hermann University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ozioma C. Okonkwo
Ozioma C. Okonkwo University of Wisconsin–Madison
Henrik Zetterberg
Henrik Zetterberg University of Gothenburg
Bradley T. Christian
Bradley T. Christian University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Vikas Singh
Vikas Singh University of Wisconsin–Madison
Rick Chappell
Rick Chappell University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree opens up diverse career pathways, many of which require specific licensure and education standards depending on your location. If you’re considering a future as a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), it’s important to understand state-specific requirements, which may vary substantially.

For example, you can review detailed steps on how to become a licensed therapist in Jacksonville or explore the step-by-step process for how to become a licensed therapist in Jersey City. Additionally, if you are interested in practicing in Missouri, be sure to check out the licensed therapist requirements in Kansas City. Meanwhile, Texas residents should look into the Laredo licensed therapist education requirements.

These resources can guide your choice of online degree programs and help you prepare for supervised experience, exams, and state applications. Selecting the right education path now ensures you’ll meet all qualifications needed to launch a successful career in counseling or therapy across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca L. Koscik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles