World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 114 340 298 18 18 728 46962
Medicine 114 4732 4440 132 127 836 48075

Paul Maruff publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Maruff between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Maruff published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 21.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 53 publications in 2022. 78 of the 931 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 53. Peak 53 publications in 2022. 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 26 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 25 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 28 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 34 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 43 publications 2014: 40 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 46 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 52 publications 2019: 41 publications 2020: 47 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 53 publications 2023: 53 publications 2024: 52 publications 2025: 26 publications
1983 2025

931 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Maruff: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 2
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 3
1995 4
1996 4
1997 6
1998 10
1999 13
2000 26
2001 20
2002 25
2003 19
2004 28
2005 18
2006 34
2007 17
2008 22
2009 25
2010 26
2011 34
2012 23
2013 43
2014 40
2015 41
2016 46
2017 33
2018 52
2019 41
2020 47
2021 41
2022 53
2023 53
2024 52
2025 26
Total 931
Download as CSV

Paul Maruff publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Maruff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 705+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 728 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100 728
Download as CSV

Paul Maruff D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Maruff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 114–115 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32 114
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul Maruff is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and has a research focus primarily in Medicine, with extensive work in Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, and Cognitive Neuroscience. Their research spans topics related to dementia and cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, health and environmental factors affecting cognitive aging, functional brain connectivity studies, nutritional studies and diet, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, and frailty in older adults.

They have published numerous papers across several scientific venues. Frequently publishing in Alzheimer's & Dementia, they also have publications in the Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, and Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring.

Notable recent papers include:

  • MRI signatures of brain age and disease over the lifespan based on a deep brain network and 14,468 individuals worldwide, 2020, Brain
  • Risk prediction of late-onset Alzheimer's disease implies an oligogenic architecture, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Plasma Aβ42/40 ratio, p-tau181, GFAP, and NfL across the Alzheimer's disease continuum: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study in the AIBL cohort, 2022, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • The Brain Chart of Aging: Machine-learning analytics reveals links between brain aging, white matter disease, amyloid burden, and cognition in the iSTAGING consortium of 10,216 harmonized MR scans, 2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Fifteen Years of the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) Study: Progress and Observations from 2,359 Older Adults Spanning the Spectrum from Cognitive Normality to Alzheimer's Disease, 2021, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports

Maruff frequently collaborates with a cohort of researchers in their field. These include Colin L. Masters, Yen Ying Lim, Jürgen Fripp, Christopher C. Rowe, and Ralph N. Martins.

Their research covers multiple subfields, including psychiatry and mental health, physiology, cognitive neuroscience, health toxicology and mutagenesis, and experimental and cognitive psychology. The main topics of their work reflect a focus on various aspects of dementia, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive aging, brain connectivity, nutrition, and the biological mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration.

Best Publications

  • Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer's disease: a prospective cohort study.

    Victor L. Villemagne;Samantha Burnham;Pierrick Bourgeat;Belinda M. Brown

  • Imaging beta-amyloid burden in aging and dementia.

    Christopher C Rowe;Steven Ng;Uwe Ackermann;Sylvia Gong

  • The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: Methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer's disease

    Kathryn A Ellis;Ashley I Bush;David Darby;Daniela De Fazio

  • Beta-amyloid imaging and memory in non-demented individuals: evidence for preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

    Kerryn Elizabeth Pike;Gregory Raymond Savage;Victor L Villemagne;Steven Ng

  • Recommendations for the nomenclature of cognitive change associated with anaesthesia and surgery—2018

    L. Evered;L. Evered;B. Silbert;B. Silbert;D.S. Knopman;D.A. Scott;D.A. Scott

  • Validity of the CogState Brief Battery: Relationship to Standardized Tests and Sensitivity to Cognitive Impairment in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Schizophrenia, and AIDS Dementia Complex

    Paul M Maruff;Elizabeth Thomas;Lucette A Cysique;Lucette A Cysique;Bruce J Brew

  • Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is independent of type of surgery and anesthetic.

    Lisbeth Evered;David A. Scott;Brendan Silbert;Paul Maruff

  • Duration of preclinical, prodromal, and dementia stages of Alzheimer's disease in relation to age, sex, and APOE genotype

    Lisa Vermunt;Sietske A. M. Sikkes;Ardo van den Hout;Ron Handels

  • The effects of practice on the cognitive test performance of neurologically normal individuals assessed at brief test–retest intervals

    Alex Collie;Paul M Maruff;David Gordon Darby;Michael McStephen

  • Practice Effects Associated with the Repeated Assessment of Cognitive Function Using the CogState Battery at 10-minute, One Week and One Month Test-retest Intervals

    Marina G. Falleti;Paul Maruff;Alexander Collie;David G. Darby

  • Executive function and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: stimulant medication and better executive function performance in children.

    S Kempton;Alistair L A Vance;Paul Maruff;Ernest Sl Luk

  • The neuropsychology of preclinical Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.

    A. Collie;P. Maruff;P. Maruff

  • Prevalence and pattern of neuropsychological impairment in human immunodeficiency virus-infected/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) patients across pre- and post-highly active antiretroviral therapy eras: a combined study of two cohorts.

    Lucette A Cysique;Paul Maruff;Bruce J Brew

  • Subjective Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: An Overview of Self-Report Measures Used Across 19 International Research Studies

    Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Colette M. Smart;Paul K. Crane;Rebecca E. Amariglio

  • Neuropsychological deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a comparison with unipolar depression, panic disorder, and normal controls.

    Rosemary Purcell;Paul Maruff;Michael Kyrios;Christos Pantelis

  • Cognitive Deficits in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder on Tests of Frontal–Striatal Function

    Rosemary Purcell;Rosemary Purcell;Paul Maruff;Paul Maruff;Michael Kyrios;Christos Pantelis;Christos Pantelis

  • Neuropsychological function in young patients with unipolar major depression.

    R. Purcell;P. Maruff;M. Kyrios;C. Pantelis

  • Intensity of dementia through latent variable modelling (I-DeLV) in the AIBL cohort

    Samantha Burnham;Petra Graham;Bill Wilson;David Ames

  • Subjective cognitive decline and rates of incident Alzheimer's disease and non–Alzheimer's disease dementia

    Rosalinde E.R. Slot;Sietske A.M. Sikkes;Johannes Berkhof;Henry Brodaty

  • The Nature and Severity of Cognitive Impairment Associated with Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature.

    Marina G. Falleti;Antonietta Sanfilippo;Paul Maruff;Le Ann Weih

  • CogSport: reliability and correlation with conventional cognitive tests used in postconcussion medical evaluations.

    Alex Collie;Paul M Maruff;Michael Makdissi;Paul R McCrory

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph N. Martins
Ralph N. Martins Edith Cowan University
David Ames
David Ames University of Melbourne
Christopher C. Rowe
Christopher C. Rowe University of Melbourne
Victor L. Villemagne
Victor L. Villemagne University of Pittsburgh
Yen Ying Lim
Yen Ying Lim Monash University
Peter J. Snyder
Peter J. Snyder University of Rhode Island
Colin L. Masters
Colin L. Masters University of Melbourne
Kathryn A. Ellis
Kathryn A. Ellis University of Melbourne
David Darby
David Darby Monash University
Robert H. Pietrzak
Robert H. Pietrzak Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in psychology opens diverse career pathways beyond traditional practice. Many students wonder, is a degree in psychology worth it? The answer depends on your interests and goals. Psychology graduates are in demand in fields like healthcare, human resources, education, and more.

For example, students interested in workplace dynamics can consider what can you do with industrial/organizational psychology. Careers in this area include talent development, employee training, and organizational consulting.

If you’re passionate about learning and development, explore what can you do with a masters in educational psychology. This specialization leads to opportunities in curriculum design, educational policy, and student counseling.

There are also more affordable study options, such as pursuing a cheap masters in child and adolescent psychology online. Graduates can work in schools, youth services, or clinical environments supporting young people.

No matter your chosen focus, online degrees in psychology offer flexibility and the ability to tailor learning to your future career path.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Maruff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles