World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
22277
World Ranking
2447
National Ranking
1419

Peter J. Snyder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Snyder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 251 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter J. Snyder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Snyder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Cognition
  • Disease

Peter J. Snyder mainly focuses on Cognition, Disease, Audiology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience. His work deals with themes such as Developmental psychology, Psychological intervention and Clinical psychology, which intersect with Cognition. His Disease research includes elements of Biomarker and Biomarker Analysis.

His Audiology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Speech recognition, Speech production, Parkinson's disease, Treatment response and Depression. The Psychiatry study which covers Incidence that intersects with Hand preference, Mental rotation, Sex factors and Spatial memory. His research in Neuroscience intersects with topics in Crossover study, Anesthesia and Dementia, Cognitive decline.

His most cited work include:

  • The Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease (1942 citations)
  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis (450 citations)
  • Validity of the CogState Brief Battery: Relationship to Standardized Tests and Sensitivity to Cognitive Impairment in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Schizophrenia, and AIDS Dementia Complex (379 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Cognition, Disease, Audiology, Developmental psychology and Neuroscience. His Cognition study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Placebo and Clinical psychology. His Disease research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Psychiatry and Clinical trial.

His Audiology study also includes fields such as

  • Speech production that connect with fields like Dysarthria,
  • Crossover study that intertwine with fields like Anesthesia. Peter J. Snyder studies Developmental psychology, namely Visual learning. His work on Neuroimaging, Cholinergic and Cognitive impairment as part of general Neuroscience study is frequently linked to Cholinergic neurotransmission, bridging the gap between disciplines.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Cognition (53.33%)
  • Disease (50.33%)
  • Audiology (42.67%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Disease (50.33%)
  • Dementia (18.67%)
  • Internal medicine (23.00%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Peter J. Snyder mainly investigates Disease, Dementia, Internal medicine, Neuroscience and Cognition. Peter J. Snyder has researched Disease in several fields, including Retinal, Bioinformatics and Intensive care medicine. His research brings together the fields of Psychiatry and Dementia.

His Internal medicine course of study focuses on Oncology and Amyloidosis, Positron emission tomography, Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Peter J. Snyder interconnects Developmental psychology, Aerobic exercise, Mindfulness and Randomized controlled trial in the investigation of issues within Cognition. The concepts of his Developmental psychology study are interwoven with issues in Amyloid beta, Audiology, Working memory, Verbal learning and Meta-analysis.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The cholinergic system in the pathophysiology and treatment of Alzheimer's disease. (238 citations)
  • The cholinergic system in the pathophysiology and treatment of Alzheimer's disease. (238 citations)
  • Pathophysiologic relationship between Alzheimer's disease, cerebrovascular disease, and cardiovascular risk: A review and synthesis (167 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Cognition
  • Law

His main research concerns Dementia, Disease, Psychiatry, Cognition and Cognitive decline. Peter J. Snyder combines subjects such as Alzheimer's disease, Vascular Alterations and Cholinergic neuron with his study of Dementia. His Disease study incorporates themes from Patient risk, Retinal, Bioinformatics and Intensive care medicine.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Life expectancy, Epidemiology, Incidence and Pathogenesis. Many of his studies on Cognition apply to Developmental psychology as well. His work in Developmental psychology addresses subjects such as Working memory, which are connected to disciplines such as Cognitive impairment.

Best Publications

  • The Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease

    Marilyn S. Albert;Steven T. DeKosky;Dennis Dickson;Bruno Dubois

  • The cholinergic system in the pathophysiology and treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

    Harald Hampel;M.-Marsel Mesulam;A Claudio Cuello;Martin R Farlow

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • Validity of the CogState Brief Battery: Relationship to Standardized Tests and Sensitivity to Cognitive Impairment in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Schizophrenia, and AIDS Dementia Complex

    Paul M Maruff;Elizabeth Thomas;Lucette A Cysique;Lucette A Cysique;Bruce J Brew

  • The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Progress report and future plans

    Michael W. Weiner;Michael W. Weiner;Paul S. Aisen;Clifford R. Jack;William J. Jagust

  • Pathophysiologic relationship between Alzheimer's disease, cerebrovascular disease, and cardiovascular risk: A review and synthesis

    Cláudia Y. Santos;Peter J. Snyder;Wen-Chih Wu;Mia Zhang

  • Voice acoustic measures of depression severity and treatment response collected via interactive voice response (IVR) technology

    James C. Mundt;Peter J. Snyder;Peter J. Snyder;Michael S. Cannizzaro;Michael S. Cannizzaro;Kara Chappie

  • Absence of regional hemispheric volume asymmetries in first-episode schizophrenia.

    R M Bilder;H Wu;B Bogerts;G Degreef

  • Immediate and delayed effects of cognitive interventions in healthy elderly: a review of current literature and future directions.

    Kathryn V. Papp;Stephen J. Walsh;Peter J. Snyder

  • Practice effects due to serial cognitive assessment: Implications for preclinical Alzheimer's disease randomized controlled trials

    Terry E. Goldberg;Philip D. Harvey;Keith A. Wesnes;Peter J. Snyder

  • Revisiting the Cholinergic Hypothesis in Alzheimer's Disease: Emerging Evidence from Translational and Clinical Research

    Harald Hampel;M.-M. Mesulam;A. C. Cuello;A. S. Khachaturian

  • A trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease.

    Stephen Salloway;Martin Farlow;Eric McDade;David B. Clifford

  • Basal forebrain degeneration precedes and predicts the cortical spread of Alzheimer's pathology.

    Taylor W. Schmitz;R. Nathan Spreng;Michael W. Weiner;Paul Aisen

  • Variability in fundamental frequency during speech in prodromal and incipient Parkinson's disease: A longitudinal case study

    Brian Harel;Michael Cannizzaro;Peter J. Snyder;Peter J. Snyder;Peter J. Snyder

  • The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association workgroup

    Marilyn S. Albert;Steven T. DeKosky;Dennis Dickson;Bruno Dubois

  • Blood-based biomarkers in Alzheimer disease: Current state of the science and a novel collaborative paradigm for advancing from discovery to clinic.

    Sid E. O'Bryant;Michelle M. Mielke;Robert A. Rissman;Simone Lista;Simone Lista

  • Voice acoustical measurement of the severity of major depression.

    Michael Cannizzaro;Brian Harel;Brian Harel;Nicole Reilly;Nicole Reilly;Phillip Chappell

  • Cognitive effects of immediate-release methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Robert H Pietrzak;Catherine M Mollica;Paul Maruff;Peter J Snyder;Peter J Snyder

  • Outcomes and costs of acute treatment of traumatic brain injury.

    Lisa J McGarry;David Thompson;Frederick H Millham;Linda Cowell

  • Subregional neuroanatomical change as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease

    Dominic Holland;James B. Brewer;Donald J. Hagler;Christine Fennema-Notestine

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Maruff
Paul Maruff University of Melbourne
Yen Ying Lim
Yen Ying Lim Monash University
Robert H. Pietrzak
Robert H. Pietrzak Yale University
Linda C. Mayes
Linda C. Mayes Yale University
Victor L. Villemagne
Victor L. Villemagne University of Pittsburgh
Stephen Salloway
Stephen Salloway Brown University
Ralph N. Martins
Ralph N. Martins Edith Cowan University
Christopher C. Rowe
Christopher C. Rowe University of Melbourne
David Ames
David Ames University of Melbourne
Kathryn A. Ellis
Kathryn A. Ellis University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse and rewarding career options. Many students are now seeking flexibility and value by enrolling in online degree programs. For those interested in specialized study locations, learning about the most valuable psychology degrees in Tampa can guide your decision if region matters.

If you want to compare programs nationwide, examining the best value psychology programs in USA highlights universities offering strong returns on investment. These rankings consider both academic reputation and career outcomes.

Psychology majors often pursue social work careers, where online pathways are increasingly popular. To start your journey, look into the best online bsw programs in America for undergraduate options. If you’re based in California or wish to work there, researching the best online social work programs in California can help you find regionally accredited programs that align with local licensure requirements.

Whether you pursue pure psychology or pivot to social work, online degrees provide flexible routes to meaningful and impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Snyder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles