World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
7677
World Ranking
7601
National Ranking
99

Anthony Tang publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Tang sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 158 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Anthony Tang D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Tang sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony Tang is affiliated with Singapore Management University in Singapore and has contributed to the field of Computer Science, with a concentration on Human-Computer Interaction. The scientist's research spans 32 publications in this domain, with notable involvement in related subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Social Psychology.

The central topics of Anthony Tang's work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Interactive and Immersive Displays, Digital Games and Media, Augmented Reality Applications, Educational Games and Gamification, and Usability and User Interface Design.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Towards Balancing VR Immersion and Bystander Awareness, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Designing Visuo-Haptic Illusions with Proxies in Virtual Reality: Exploration of Grasp, Movement Trajectory and Object Mass, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Remote Communication in Wilderness Search and Rescue, 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Press A to Jump: Design Strategies for Video Game Learnability, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • How People Prompt Generative AI to Create Interactive VR Scenes, 2024, Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Anthony Tang include:

  • Lora Oehlberg
  • Jiannan Li
  • Lev Poretski
  • Brennan Jones
  • Carman Neustaedter

The scientist has published regularly in several venues, with a focus on:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (6 publications)
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2 publications)
  • ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences (2 publications)
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (2 publications)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (2 publications)

Best Publications

  • ICDAR 2003 robust reading competitions: entries, results, and future directions

    Simon M. Lucas;Alex Panaretos;Luis Sosa;Anthony Tang

  • ICDAR 2003 robust reading competitions

    S.M. Lucas;A. Panaretos;L. Sosa;A. Tang

  • Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays

    Anthony Tang;Melanie Tory;Barry Po;Petra Neumann

  • Personal Visualization and Personal Visual Analytics

    Dandan Huang;Melanie Tory;Bon Adriel Aseniero;Lyn Bartram

  • Revisiting collaboration through mixed reality: The evolution of groupware

    Barrett Ens;Joel Lanir;Anthony Tang;Scott Bateman

  • Fluid integration of rotation and translation

    Russell Kruger;Sheelagh Carpendale;Stacey D. Scott;Anthony Tang

  • The fat thumb: using the thumb's contact size for single-handed mobile interaction

    Sebastian Boring;David Ledo;Xiang 'Anthony' Chen;Nicolai Marquardt

  • Shadow reaching: a new perspective on interaction for large displays

    Garth Shoemaker;Anthony Tang;Kellogg S. Booth

  • VideoArms: Embodiments for Mixed Presence Groupware

    Anthony Tang;Carman Neustaedter;Saul Greenberg

  • Constructive visualization

    Samuel Huron;Sheelagh Carpendale;Alice Thudt;Anthony Tang

  • An exploratory study of visual information analysis

    Petra Isenberg;Anthony Tang;Sheelagh Carpendale

  • Physio@Home: Exploring Visual Guidance and Feedback Techniques for Physiotherapy Exercises

    Richard Tang;Xing-Dong Yang;Scott Bateman;Joaquim Jorge

  • The Frustrations and Benefits of Mobile Device Usage in the Home when Co-Present with Family Members

    Erick Oduor;Carman Neustaedter;William Odom;Anthony Tang

  • "almost touching": parent-child remote communication using the sharetable system

    Svetlana Yarosh;Anthony Tang;Sanika Mokashi;Gregory D. Abowd

  • Three's company: understanding communication channels in three-way distributed collaboration

    Anthony Tang;Michel Pahud;Kori Inkpen;Hrvoje Benko

  • Display and presence disparity in Mixed Presence Groupware

    Anthony Tang;Michael Boyle;Saul Greenberg

  • Eliciting usable gestures for multi-display environments

    Teddy Seyed;Chris Burns;Mario Costa Sousa;Frank Maurer

  • Stabilized Annotations for Mobile Remote Assistance

    Omid Fakourfar;Kevin Ta;Richard Tang;Scott Bateman

  • Data Visualization on Interactive Surfaces: A Research Agenda

    P. Isenberg;T. Isenberg;T. Hesselmann;Bongshin Lee

  • Lessons learned: game design for large public displays

    Matthias Finke;Anthony Tang;Rock Leung;Michael Blackstock

  • Understanding and Mitigating Display and Presence Disparity in Mixed Presence Groupware

    Anthony Tang;Michael Boyle;Saul Greenberg

  • Revisiting Collaboration through Mixed Reality: The Evolution of Groupware - Supplemental Visualization

    Barrett Ens;Joel Lanir;Anthony Tang;Scott Bateman

Frequent Co-Authors

Saul Greenberg
Saul Greenberg University of Calgary
Carman Neustaedter
Carman Neustaedter Simon Fraser University
Sheelagh Carpendale
Sheelagh Carpendale Simon Fraser University
Sebastian Boring
Sebastian Boring Aalborg University
George A. Wells
George A. Wells University of Ottawa
Jeff S. Healey
Jeff S. Healey Population Health Research Institute
Nicolai Marquardt
Nicolai Marquardt Microsoft (United States)
Sidney Fels
Sidney Fels University of British Columbia
Paul Dorian
Paul Dorian University of Toronto
Frank Maurer
Frank Maurer University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Computer Science opens up numerous educational opportunities. For those seeking immediate workforce entry, an associate's degree online offers a flexible and fast-track route to foundational tech roles.

If you're interested in advancing your expertise, pursuing one of the most valuable masters degrees in Computer Science can lead to specialized and high-paying positions. Many online universities now provide advanced programs tailored to career growth in technology fields.

Affordability is another key factor when selecting an online program. Exploring affordable online courses can help you earn a degree without incurring significant debt, making education in Computer Science more accessible to everyone.

Even if your academic background isn’t perfect, you still have options. There are best colleges for low gpa that offer reputable online Computer Science programs for students needing a second chance.

With flexible online degrees and numerous career pathways, there's never been a better time to pursue Computer Science in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony Tang

Trending Scientists