World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Raimund Dachselt

Raimund Dachselt

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 47 6625 6433 315 305 219 6061

Raimund Dachselt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Raimund Dachselt between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Raimund Dachselt published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2014. 12 of the 245 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2014. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 8 publications
1999 2025

245 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Raimund Dachselt: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 3
2001 3
2002 2
2003 3
2004 1
2005 0
2006 5
2007 5
2008 6
2009 10
2010 17
2011 9
2012 18
2013 12
2014 20
2015 10
2016 15
2017 11
2018 16
2019 10
2020 11
2021 17
2022 19
2023 8
2024 4
2025 8
Total 245
Download as CSV

Raimund Dachselt publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raimund Dachselt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 212–221 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 219 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490 219
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Raimund Dachselt D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raimund Dachselt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689 47
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Raimund Dachselt is affiliated with TU Dresden in Germany and has a research profile primarily situated within computer science. Their scholarly output spans 70 publications, with a focus on several subfields, including computer vision and pattern recognition, human-computer interaction, artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, and information systems.

Their research centers on topics such as data visualization and analytics, virtual reality applications and impacts, interactive and immersive displays, augmented reality applications, software testing and debugging techniques, semantic web and ontologies, and software engineering research.

Dachselt's recent publications include:

  • Personal Augmented Reality for Information Visualization on Large Interactive Displays, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Where Should We Put It? Layout and Placement Strategies of Documents in Augmented Reality for Collaborative Sensemaking, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • AvatAR: An Immersive Analysis Environment for Human Motion Data Combining Interactive 3D Avatars and Trajectories, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Responsive Matrix Cells: A Focus+Context Approach for Exploring and Editing Multivariate Graphs, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • STRAIDE: A Research Platform for Shape-Changing Spatial Displays based on Actuated Strings, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Raimund Dachselt include:

  • Julián Méndez
  • Tom Horak
  • Christian Alrabbaa
  • Franz Baader
  • Patrick Koopmann

The venues where they frequently publish reflect their fields of study and include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Look & touch: gaze-supported target acquisition

    Sophie Stellmach;Raimund Dachselt

  • PaperLens: advanced magic lens interaction above the tabletop

    Martin Spindler;Sophie Stellmach;Raimund Dachselt

  • Do background colors improve program comprehension in the #ifdef hell?

    Janet Feigenspan;Christian Kästner;Sven Apel;Jörg Liebig

  • Investigating multi-touch and pen gestures for diagram editing on interactive surfaces

    Mathias Frisch;Jens Heydekorn;Raimund Dachselt

  • Virtual Environments: Three-dimensional menus: A survey and taxonomy

    Raimund Dachselt;Anett Hübner

  • Tangible views for information visualization

    Martin Spindler;Christian Tominski;Heidrun Schumann;Raimund Dachselt

  • MIRIA: A Mixed Reality Toolkit for the In-Situ Visualization and Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Interaction Data

    Unknown

  • Interaktive Systeme - Band 1: Grundlagen, Graphical User Interfaces, Informationsvisualisierung

    Bernhard Preim;Raimund Dachselt

  • Natural throw and tilt interaction between mobile phones and distant displays

    Raimund Dachselt;Robert Buchholz

  • Contigra: an XML-based architecture for component-oriented 3D applications

    Raimund Dachselt;Michael Hinz;Klaus Meißner

  • Personal Augmented Reality for Information Visualization on Large Interactive Displays

    Patrick Reipschlager;Tamara Flemisch;Raimund Dachselt

  • Interactive Lenses for Visualization: An Extended Survey

    C. Tominski;S. Gladisch;U. Kister;R. Dachselt

  • Still looking: investigating seamless gaze-supported selection, positioning, and manipulation of distant targets

    Sophie Stellmach;Raimund Dachselt

  • A Survey on Interactive Lenses in Visualization

    Christian Tominski;Stefan Gladisch;Ulrike Kister;Raimund Dachselt

  • Where Should We Put It? Layout and Placement Strategies of Documents in Augmented Reality for Collaborative Sensemaking

    Unknown

  • PaperLens: advanced magic lens interaction above the tabletop

    Unknown

  • MARVIS: Combining Mobile Devices and Augmented Reality for Visual Data Analysis

    Ricardo Langner;Marc Satkowski;Wolfgang Büschel;Raimund Dachselt

  • DesignAR: Immersive 3D-Modeling Combining Augmented Reality with Interactive Displays

    Patrick Reipschläger;Raimund Dachselt

  • When David Meets Goliath: Combining Smartwatches with a Large Vertical Display for Visual Data Exploration

    Tom Horak;Sriram Karthik Badam;Niklas Elmqvist;Raimund Dachselt

  • A set of multi-touch graph interaction techniques

    Sebastian Schmidt;Miguel A. Nacenta;Raimund Dachselt;Sheelagh Carpendale

  • Behavior3D: an XML-based framework for 3D graphics behavior

    Raimund Dachselt;Enrico Rukzio

  • Advanced gaze visualizations for three-dimensional virtual environments

    Sophie Stellmach;Lennart Nacke;Raimund Dachselt

  • FacetZoom: a continuous multi-scale widget for navigating hierarchical metadata

    Raimund Dachselt;Mathias Frisch;Markus Weiland

Frequent Co-Authors

Heidrun Schumann
Heidrun Schumann University of Rostock
Lennart E. Nacke
Lennart E. Nacke University of Waterloo
Christian Kästner
Christian Kästner Carnegie Mellon University
Enrico Rukzio
Enrico Rukzio University of Ulm
Michael Rohs
Michael Rohs University of Hannover
Ivo F. Sbalzarini
Ivo F. Sbalzarini Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics
Harald Reiterer
Harald Reiterer University of Konstanz
Petra Isenberg
Petra Isenberg French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Sven Apel
Sven Apel Saarland University
Sheelagh Carpendale
Sheelagh Carpendale Simon Fraser University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science can open doors to a wide range of related online degrees and lucrative career pathways. Many students choose flexible online programs to build skills that complement their core CS knowledge.

For instance, analytical thinkers may be interested in a masters in criminology online, which teaches data analysis and investigative methods for criminal justice careers. Those looking to merge business and tech skills could benefit from an online accountant degree, focusing on digital accounting software and financial management.

Data science is another fast-growing field tied closely to computer science. The best data science master's programs online offer advanced training in machine learning, artificial intelligence, and big data—key areas for tech-driven industries.

Alternatively, if you want to combine technology with project leadership, a construction management degree online can prepare you for roles managing complex building and infrastructure projects.

Each of these online options provides unique career advantages and the flexibility to study at your own pace.

Best Scientists Citing Raimund Dachselt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles