World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sven N. Reske

Sven N. Reske

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
25559
World Ranking
14196
National Ranking
753

Sven N. Reske publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sven N. Reske sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 419 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Sven N. Reske D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sven N. Reske sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sven N. Reske is affiliated with the University of Ulm in Germany. Their professional position at this institution situates them within a German academic context, which often emphasizes interdisciplinary research and collaboration across scientific domains.

The scientist's research portfolio currently does not include recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publications in specific academic venues, indicating either an early career stage, a focus on non-published work, or undisclosed research outputs in major databases.

There are no documented main or subfields of study associated explicitly with Sven N. Reske. Similarly, information about distinct research topics or thematic work areas is not available, which leaves the precise areas of specialization unspecified.

No book publications or awards have been recorded for this scientist, which suggests that contributions might primarily be in formats or forums not captured in the present data or that such recognitions have not been obtained.

The absence of data on frequent collaborators and research venues prevents a detailed mapping of the scientist's professional network or preferred dissemination channels.

Overall, Sven N. Reske's profile is marked by a limited public record in terms of scientific publishing, co-authorship, and research themes based on current data sources.

Best Publications

  • Use of Positron Emission Tomography for Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma

    Malik E. Juweid;Sigrid Stroobants;Otto S. Hoekstra;Felix M. Mottaghy

  • Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.

    Alan L Whone;Ray L Watts;A Jon Stoessl;Margaret Davis

  • Imaging Proliferation in Lung Tumors with PET: 18F-FLT Versus 18F-FDG

    Andreas K Buck;Gisela Halter;Holger Schirrmeister;Jörg Kotzerke

  • Response assessment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by integrated International Workshop Criteria and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

    Malik E. Juweid;Gregory A. Wiseman;Julie M. Vose;Justine M. Ritchie

  • FDG-PET for clinical use. Results of the 3rd German Interdisciplinary Consensus Conference, "Onko-PET III", 21 July and 19 September 2000.

    Sven N. Reske;Jörg Kotzerke

  • Sensitivity in detecting osseous lesions depends on anatomic localization: planar bone scintigraphy versus 18F PET.

    Holger Schirrmeister;Albrecht Guhlmann;Klaus Elsner;Jörg Kotzerke

  • Extranodal malignant lymphoma: detection with FDG PET versus CT.

    F Moog;M Bangerter;C G Diederichs;A Guhlmann

  • Lymphoma: role of whole-body 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) PET in nodal staging.

    F Moog;M Bangerter;C G Diederichs;A Guhlmann

  • 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography as a new approach to detect lymphomatous bone marrow.

    Florian Moog;Markus Bangerter;Jbrg Kotzerke;Albrecht Guhlmann

  • Prospective evaluation of the clinical value of planar bone scans, SPECT, and (18)F-labeled NaF PET in newly diagnosed lung cancer.

    Holger Schirrmeister;Gerhard Glatting;Jürgen Hetzel;Karin Nüssle

  • FDG uptake in breast cancer: correlation with biological and clinical prognostic parameters.

    Andreas Buck;Holger Schirrmeister;Thorsten Kühn;Changxian Shen

  • Imaging Prostate Cancer with 11C-Choline PET/CT

    Sven N Reske;Norbert M Blumstein;Bernd Neumaier;Hans-Werner Gottfried

  • Early Detection and Accurate Description of Extent of Metastatic Bone Disease in Breast Cancer With Fluoride Ion and Positron Emission Tomography

    Holger Schirrmeister;Albrecht Guhlmann;Jörg Kotzerke;Claudia Santjohanser

  • Whole-body 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for accurate staging of Hodgkin's disease

    M. Bangerter;F. Moog;I. Buchmann;J. Kotzerke

  • Fluorine-18 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with the standard staging procedures.

    Holger Schirrmeister;Thorsten Kühn;Albrecht Guhlmann;Claudia Santjohanser

  • 3-deoxy-3-[(18)F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography for noninvasive assessment of proliferation in pulmonary nodules

    Andreas K Buck;Holger Schirrmeister;Martin Hetzel;Mareike Von Der Heide

  • Gene silencing by adenovirus-delivered siRNA.

    Changxian Shen;Andreas K Buck;Xiangwei Liu;Michael Winkler

  • Malignant melanoma S3-guideline "diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of melanoma".

    Annette Pflugfelder;Corinna Kochs;Andreas Blum;Marcus Capellaro

  • Choosing the optimal fit function: comparison of the Akaike information criterion and the F-test.

    Gerhard Glatting;Peter Kletting;Sven N. Reske;Kathrin Hohl

  • Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Therapy Response of Osteogenic Sarcoma Using FDG PET

    Michael Schulte;Doris Brecht-Krauss;Mathias Werner;Erich Hartwig

Frequent Co-Authors

Felix M. Mottaghy
Felix M. Mottaghy RWTH Aachen University
Hartmut Döhner
Hartmut Döhner University of Ulm
Klaus-Michael Debatin
Klaus-Michael Debatin University of Ulm
Hans G. Beger
Hans G. Beger University of Ulm
Peter Møller
Peter Møller University of Copenhagen
Stephan Stilgenbauer
Stephan Stilgenbauer University of Ulm
Cord Sunderkötter
Cord Sunderkötter University of Münster
Andreas Mackensen
Andreas Mackensen University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Chris Sander
Chris Sander Harvard University
Claus Garbe
Claus Garbe University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine but seeking alternative or complementary educational paths, online healthcare degrees offer flexibility and new opportunities. Accredited programs now enable learners to gain medical expertise from anywhere, meeting diverse professional and lifestyle needs.

Aspiring pharmacists can pursue an online pharmd to advance in pharmaceutical care and leadership without putting their careers on hold. Those interested in managing patient data can explore health information technology programs online, which combine healthcare knowledge with information systems.

Another fast-growing field is medical coding and billing. Obtaining a medical coding certification online prepares graduates for vital administrative roles in hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies.

For nursing professionals, there are affordable options to boost credentials. The cheapest online acute care nurse practitioner programs allow RNs to gain specialized training and qualify for practice in acute and advanced care settings.

These online degrees and certificates open the door to impactful careers at the intersection of technology, patient care, and healthcare management—broadening your options beyond traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Sven N. Reske

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles