World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
11335
World Ranking
4584
National Ranking
204

Martina Ziefle publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martina Ziefle sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 520 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Martina Ziefle D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martina Ziefle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martina Ziefle is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany and conducts research mainly in the fields of Social Sciences and Engineering. Their work spans various subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, General Health Professions, and Social Psychology.

Their research topics cover diverse areas such as Technology Use by Older Adults, Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy, Privacy, Security, and Data Protection, Environmental Education and Sustainability, Transportation and Mobility Innovations, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, and Digital Transformation in Industry.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • "A Computer Science Perspective on Digital Transformation in Production", 2022, ACM Transactions on Internet of Things
  • "Applying an Extended UTAUT2 Model to Explain User Acceptance of Lifestyle and Therapy Mobile Health Apps: Survey Study", 2021, JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • "What does the public think about artificial intelligence?-A criticality map to understand bias in the public perception of AI", 2023, Frontiers in Computer Science
  • "Users' Preferences for Smart Home Automation - Investigating Aspects of Privacy and Trust", 2021, Telematics and Informatics
  • "The Role of Privacy in the Acceptance of Smart Technologies: Applying the Privacy Calculus to Technology Acceptance", 2021, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Ziefle frequently publishes in venues such as AHFE International, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Frontiers in Energy Research, arXiv (Cornell University), and Energy Research & Social Science.

Their collaborations include extensive work with co-authors including Philipp Brauner, Julia Offermann, Luisa Vervier, André Calero Valdez, and Katrin Arning.

Martina Ziefle has contributed to academic books published primarily by Springer Science+Business Media and Springer Nature. Notable books include multiple editions of "Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health" (2020, 2021, 2023) and "Human-Automation Interaction" (2022).

Best Publications

  • Understanding age differences in PDA acceptance and performance

    Katrin Arning;Martina Ziefle

  • Effects of Display Resolution on Visual Performance

    Martina Ziefle

  • How older adults meet complexity: Aging effects on the usability of different mobile phones

    Martina Ziefle;Susanne Bay

  • Privacy and data security in E-health: requirements from the user's perspective

    Wiktoria Wilkowska;Martina Ziefle

  • The influence of user expertise and phone complexity on performance, ease of use and learnability of different mobile phones

    Martina Ziefle

  • Mental Models of a Cellular Phone Menu. Comparing Older and Younger Novice Users

    Martina Ziefle;Susanne Bay

  • Medical Technology in Smart Homes: Exploring the User's Perspective on Privacy, Intimacy and Trust

    Martina Ziefle;Carsten Rocker;Andreas Holzinger

  • How to overcome disorientation in mobile phone menus: a comparison of two different types of navigation aids

    Martina Ziefle;Susanne Bay

  • Assessment of urban green space structures and their quality from a multidimensional perspective

    Benjamin Daniels;Barbara S. Zaunbrecher;Bastian Paas;Richard Ottermanns

  • Fast-charging station here, please! User criteria for electric vehicle fast-charging locations

    R. Philipsen;T. Schmidt;J. van Heek;M. Ziefle

  • Different Perspectives on Technology Acceptance: The Role of Technology Type and Age

    Katrin Arning;Martina Ziefle

  • Smart Home Technologies: Insights into Generation-Specific Acceptance Motives

    Sylvia Gaul;Martina Ziefle

  • Information presentation in small screen devices: The trade-off between visual density and menu foresight

    Martina Ziefle

  • Reducing Complexity with Simplicity - Usability Methods for Industry 4.0

    André Calero Valdez;Andreas Holzinger;Anne Kathrin Schaar;Martina Ziefle

  • Effects of age, cognitive, and personal factors on PDA menu navigation performance

    Katrin Arning;Martina Ziefle

  • Which Factors Form Older Adults' Acceptance of Mobile Information and Communication Technologies?

    Wiktoria Wilkowska;Martina Ziefle

  • Recommender systems for health informatics: state-of-the-art and future perspectives

    André Calero Valdez;André Calero Valdez;Martina Ziefle;Katrien Verbert;Alexander Felfernig

  • Internet users’ perceptions of information sensitivity – insights from Germany

    Eva Maria Schomakers;Chantal Lidynia;Dirk Müllmann;Martina Ziefle

  • Acceptance of pervasive healthcare systems: A comparison of different implementation concepts

    Martina Ziefle;Carsten Rocker

  • Risk-benefit perceptions and public acceptance of Carbon Capture and Utilization

    Katrin Arning;Julia Offermann-van Heek;André Sternberg;André Bardow

  • Future Care Floor: A Sensitive Floor for Movement Monitoring and Fall Detection in Home Environments

    Lars Klack;Christian Möllering;Martina Ziefle;Thomas Schmitz-Rode

  • From Smart Health to Smart Hospitals

    Andreas Holzinger;Carsten Röcker;Martina Ziefle

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Holzinger
Andreas Holzinger BOKU University
Jan Borchers
Jan Borchers RWTH Aachen University
Leif Kobbelt
Leif Kobbelt RWTH Aachen University
André Bardow
André Bardow ETH Zurich
Klaus Wehrle
Klaus Wehrle RWTH Aachen University
Matthias Jarke
Matthias Jarke RWTH Aachen University
Michael Sedlmair
Michael Sedlmair University of Stuttgart
Christian Brecher
Christian Brecher RWTH Aachen University
Alexander Mitsos
Alexander Mitsos RWTH Aachen University
Reinhard Madlener
Reinhard Madlener RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to many academic and professional options in the US. Students at all levels have flexible opportunities thanks to the rise of online learning. For those seeking affordable advanced credentials, there are many cheapest online graduate programs that let you develop specialized expertise without the high costs of traditional campus degrees.

If leadership interests you, pursuing an online PhD in organizational leadership can prepare you for top roles in tech and business. Educators can also consider an Ed D in education to advance their careers within academic or training environments.

Not sure where to start? Many students begin at community colleges near me for foundational computer science courses. This can save money and offer a pathway to transfer into a four-year degree. Whatever your goals, exploring these online and affordable options can help you build a flexible, rewarding career in computer science or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Martina Ziefle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles