World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Sedlmair

Michael Sedlmair

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 37 10698 10399 538 525 192 6242

Michael Sedlmair publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Sedlmair between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Sedlmair published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2021. 44 of the 230 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2021. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 20 publications
2007 2025

230 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Sedlmair: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 2
2009 4
2010 4
2011 4
2012 4
2013 2
2014 6
2015 7
2016 14
2017 8
2018 17
2019 11
2020 23
2021 28
2022 24
2023 27
2024 24
2025 20
Total 230
Download as CSV

Michael Sedlmair publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Sedlmair sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 192–201 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 192 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519 192
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Sedlmair D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Sedlmair sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990 37
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Sedlmair is affiliated with the University of Stuttgart in Germany and has a primary research focus on computer science, with an emphasis on data visualization and related fields. Their work spans multiple subfields including computer vision and pattern recognition, human-computer interaction, artificial intelligence, signal processing, and social psychology.

The scientist's research addresses a variety of topics, prominently featuring data visualization and analytics. Other main topics covered include virtual reality applications and impacts, augmented reality applications, interactive and immersive displays, image and video quality assessment, gaze tracking and assistive technology, and visual attention and saliency detection.

Recent publications showcase contributions across leading venues. Notable papers include:

  • "Design Patterns for Situated Visualization in Augmented Reality" (2023), published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "The Value of Immersive Visualization" (2021), published in IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
  • "VIS30K: A Collection of Figures and Tables From IEEE Visualization Conference Publications" (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Palettailor: Discriminable Colorization for Categorical Data" (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Scalability in Visualization" (2022), published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Michael Sedlmair include:

  • Daniel Weiskopf
  • Tobias Isenberg
  • Kuno Kurzhals
  • Dieter Schmalstieg
  • Guido Reina

Publishing venues for their work frequently involve top-tier outlets such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Michael Sedlmair has also contributed to academic literature through book publications, including the 2024 title Progressive Data Analysis released by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

Best Publications

  • Design Study Methodology: Reflections from the Trenches and the Stacks

    M. Sedlmair;M. Meyer;T. Munzner

  • A Systematic Review on the Practice of Evaluating Visualization

    Tobias Isenberg;Petra Isenberg;Jian Chen;Michael Sedlmair

  • Visual Interaction with Dimensionality Reduction: A Structured Literature Analysis

    Dominik Sacha;Leishi Zhang;Michael Sedlmair;John A. Lee

  • Visual Parameter Space Analysis: A Conceptual Framework

    Michael Sedlmair;Christoph Heinzl;Stefan Bruckner;Harald Piringer

  • More than Bags of Words : Sentiment Analysis with Word Embeddings

    Elena Rudkowsky;Martin Haselmayer;Matthias Wastian;Marcelo Jenny

  • Empirical Guidance on Scatterplot and Dimension Reduction Technique Choices

    Michael Sedlmair;Tamara Munzner;Melanie Tory

  • A Taxonomy of Visual Cluster Separation Factors

    M. Sedlmair;A. Tatu;T. Munzner;M. Tory

  • What you see is what you can change

    Dominik Sacha;Michael Sedlmair;Leishi Zhang;John A. Lee

  • Opening the Black Box: Strategies for Increased User Involvement in Existing Algorithm Implementations

    Thomas Mühlbacher;Harald Piringer;Samuel Gratzl;Michael Sedlmair

  • Vispubdata.org: A Metadata Collection About IEEE Visualization (VIS) Publications

    Petra Isenberg;Florian Heimerl;Steffen Koch;Tobias Isenberg

  • Comparing Visual-Interactive Labeling with Active Learning: An Experimental Study

    Jurgen Bernard;Marco Hutter;Matthias Zeppelzauer;Dieter Fellner

  • The nested blocks and guidelines model

    Miriah D. Meyer;Michael Sedlmair;P. Samuel Quinan;Tamara Munzner

  • VIAL: a unified process for visual interactive labeling

    Jürgen Bernard;Jürgen Bernard;Matthias Zeppelzauer;Michael Sedlmair;Wolfgang Aigner;Wolfgang Aigner

  • Visualizing dimensionally-reduced data: interviews with analysts and a characterization of task sequences

    Matthew Brehmer;Michael Sedlmair;Stephen Ingram;Tamara Munzner

  • Human-centered machine learning through interactive visualization

    Dominik Sacha;Michael Sedlmair;Leishi Zhang;John Aldo Lee

  • Information visualization evaluation in large companies: challenges, experiences and recommendations

    Michael Sedlmair;Petra Isenberg;Dominikus Baur;Andreas Butz

  • Visualization as Seen through its Research Paper Keywords

    Petra Isenberg;Tobias Isenberg;Michael Sedlmair;Jian Chen

  • Priming and Anchoring Effects in Visualization

    Andre Calero Valdez;Martina Ziefle;Michael Sedlmair

  • The Streams of Our Lives: Visualizing Listening Histories in Context

    Dominikus Baur;Frederik Seiffert;Michael Sedlmair;Sebastian Boring

  • Data-driven evaluation of visual quality measures

    M. Sedlmair;M. Aupetit

  • A unified process for visual-interactive labeling

    Jürgen Bernard;Matthias Zeppelzauer;Michael Sedlmair;Wolfgang Aigner

Frequent Co-Authors

Torsten Möller
Torsten Möller University of Vienna
Petra Isenberg
Petra Isenberg French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Tobias Isenberg
Tobias Isenberg French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Daniel Weiskopf
Daniel Weiskopf University of Stuttgart
Tamara Munzner
Tamara Munzner University of British Columbia
Andreas Butz
Andreas Butz Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Oliver Deussen
Oliver Deussen University of Konstanz
Robert S. Laramee
Robert S. Laramee University of Nottingham
Baoquan Chen
Baoquan Chen Peking University
Daniel A. Keim
Daniel A. Keim University of Konstanz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science career in the USA can start with a range of flexible academic options. Many students choose online associate degree programs to build a strong foundation in coding, systems, and IT. These pathways offer flexibility for learners balancing work or family responsibilities.

If affordability and speed are priorities, you may consider cheap online degrees fast that allow you to advance your education efficiently without breaking the bank. For those who are concerned about previous academic performance, there are online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa, broadening access to postgraduate pursuits in technology fields.

Beyond technical roles, students can draw on diverse backgrounds. For example, professionals can merge computing with other disciplines leading to jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree, such as tech-based roles in educational or environmental organizations. These online pathways make it easier to tailor your education and maximize your future career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Sedlmair

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles