World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
69
Citations
19021
World Ranking
1977
National Ranking
1000

Michael Gleicher publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Gleicher sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 242 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael Gleicher D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Gleicher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Michael Gleicher is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions in several subfields, including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Mechanical Engineering.

The main topics addressed in their work include Robotic Path Planning Algorithms, Data Visualization and Analytics, Teleoperation and Haptic Systems, Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies, Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization, Tactile and Sensory Interactions, and Human Motion and Animation.

The researcher has published extensively, with a notable presence in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Journal of Vision, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Michael Gleicher include:

  • MotionBenchMaker: A Tool to Generate and Benchmark Motion Planning Datasets (2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters)
  • CellO: comprehensive and hierarchical cell type classification of human cells with the Cell Ontology (2020, iScience)
  • CAVA: A Visual Analytics System for Exploratory Columnar Data Augmentation Using Knowledge Graphs (2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics)
  • embComp: Visual Interactive Comparison of Vector Embeddings (2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics)
  • Single-query Path Planning Using Sample-Efficient Probability Informed Trees (2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters)

Frequent collaborators include Bilge Mutlu, Yeping Wang, Michael Zinn, Emmanuel Senft, and Robert G. Radwin.

Michael Gleicher has been recognized with the ACM Distinguished Member award in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Motion graphs

    Lucas Kovar;Michael Gleicher;Frédéric Pighin

  • Retargetting motion to new characters

    Michael Gleicher

  • Visual comparison for information visualization

    Michael Gleicher;Danielle Albers;Rick Walker;Ilir Jusufi

  • Automated extraction and parameterization of motions in large data sets

    Lucas Kovar;Michael Gleicher

  • Content-preserving warps for 3D video stabilization

    Feng Liu;Michael Gleicher;Hailin Jin;Aseem Agarwala

  • Motion editing with spacetime constraints

    Michael Gleicher

  • Through-the-lens camera control

    Michael Gleicher;Andrew Witkin

  • Motion Graphs

    Unknown

  • Subspace video stabilization

    Feng Liu;Michael Gleicher;Jue Wang;Hailin Jin

  • Building efficient, accurate character skins from examples

    Alex Mohr;Michael Gleicher

  • Computer puppetry: An importance-based approach

    Hyun Joon Shin;Jehee Lee;Sung Yong Shin;Michael Gleicher

  • Flexible automatic motion blending with registration curves

    Lucas Kovar;Michael Gleicher

  • Automatic image retargeting

    Vidya Setlur;Saeko Takagi;Ramesh Raskar;Michael Gleicher

  • Scalable behaviors for crowd simulation

    Mankyu Sung;Michael Gleicher;Stephen Chenney

  • Error Bars Considered Harmful: Exploring Alternate Encodings for Mean and Error

    Michael Correll;Michael Gleicher

  • Footskate cleanup for motion capture editing

    Lucas Kovar;John Schreiner;Michael Gleicher

  • Automatic image retargeting with fisheye-view warping

    Feng Liu;Michael Gleicher

  • Video retargeting: automating pan and scan

    Feng Liu;Michael Gleicher

  • Interactive dynamics

    Andrew Witkin;Michael Gleicher;William Welch

  • Image Retargeting Using Mesh Parametrization

    Yanwen Guo;Feng Liu;Jian Shi;Zhi-Hua Zhou

  • Parametric motion graphs

    Rachel Heck;Michael Gleicher

Frequent Co-Authors

Bilge Mutlu
Bilge Mutlu University of Wisconsin–Madison
Feng Liu
Feng Liu Portland State University
David H. O’Connor
David H. O’Connor University of Wisconsin–Madison
Andrew Witkin
Andrew Witkin Carnegie Mellon University
Steven Franconeri
Steven Franconeri Northwestern University
Thomas C. Friedrich
Thomas C. Friedrich University of Wisconsin–Madison
George N. Phillips
George N. Phillips Rice University
Alex Endert
Alex Endert Georgia Institute of Technology
Remco Chang
Remco Chang Tufts University
Austin L. Hughes
Austin L. Hughes University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Computer Science opens the door to a wide range of related career pathways and online study opportunities in the USA. Many students opt to combine or complement their CS studies with fields like data science, business, or project management for a competitive edge in today’s job market.

For those interested in the technology side of law enforcement, a criminal justice degree can provide valuable insights into cybersecurity, digital forensics, and cyber law. If you are considering the financial or analytics side of tech, comparing accounting degree online cost options can help you budget smartly for a double major or minor.

For advanced, data-driven roles, earning the cheapest masters in data science is a solid choice to boost expertise in AI and big data. Meanwhile, those interested in the intersection of technology and infrastructure may find the construction management bachelor degree a practical credential for tech-focused leadership in the construction industry.

Exploring these online programs can help you build a flexible, interdisciplinary foundation for a dynamic tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Gleicher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles