World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

John A. Lynch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John A. Lynch between 1960 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John A. Lynch published across 66 years, from 1960 to 2025, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2015. 5 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1960 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2015. 1960: 1 publication 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1960 2025

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John A. Lynch: publications per year, 1960 to 2025
Year Publications
1960 1
1961 0
1962 0
1963 1
1964 0
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 1
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 2
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 1
1986 3
1987 4
1988 3
1989 3
1990 6
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 6
1997 3
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 5
2005 1
2006 5
2007 1
2008 5
2009 3
2010 6
2011 4
2012 3
2013 5
2014 5
2015 7
2016 4
2017 6
2018 2
2019 6
2020 7
2021 5
2022 2
2023 3
2024 4
2025 1
Total 133
Download as CSV

John A. Lynch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Lynch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John A. Lynch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Lynch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science

Overview

John A. Lynch is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and the life sciences, with a primary focus on genetics and molecular biology.

The main fields of study in which Lynch is engaged include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Subfields of particular focus are Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Literature and Literary Theory, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their research work covers several major topics:

  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Rhetoric and Communication Studies

Selected recent publications by John A. Lynch include:

  • "A comparison of genomic diagnostics in adults and children with epilepsy and comorbid intellectual disability," 2020, European Journal of Human Genetics
  • "Understanding the Return of Genomic Sequencing Results Process: Content Review of Participant Summary Letters in the eMERGE Research Network," 2020, Journal of Personalized Medicine
  • "Indicator Dyes and Catalytic Nanoparticles for Irreversible Visual Hydrogen Sensing," 2020, Analytical Chemistry
  • "Returning negative results from large-scale genomic screening: Experiences from the eMERGE III network," 2020, American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • "Developing video education materials for the return of genomic test results to parents and adolescents," 2022, PEC Innovation

Frequently collaborating coauthors include:

  • Melanie F. Myers
  • Cynthia A. Prows
  • Kristin Childers-Buschle
  • Michelle L. McGowan
  • Ingrid A. Holm

Lynch has published multiple works in various scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • European Journal of Human Genetics
  • Journal of Personalized Medicine
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • PEC Innovation

The scientist was recognized in 2015 as a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science.

Best Publications

  • Varus and valgus alignment and incident and progressive knee osteoarthritis

    Leena Sharma;Jing Song;Dorothy Dunlop;David Felson

  • Presence of MRI-detected joint effusion and synovitis increases the risk of cartilage loss in knees without osteoarthritis at 30-month follow-up: the MOST study

    Frank W Roemer;Ali Guermazi;David T Felson;Jingbo Niu

  • Micro-computed tomography: a new tool for experimental endodontology.

    J. S. Rhodes;T. R. Pitt Ford;J. A. Lynch;P. J. Liepins

  • Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test-retest reproducibility

    C. Peterfy;J. Li;S. Zaim;J. Duryea

  • Change in MRI-detected subchondral bone marrow lesions is associated with cartilage loss: the MOST Study. A longitudinal multicentre study of knee osteoarthritis

    F W Roemer;A Guermazi;M K Javaid;J A Lynch

  • Joint space width measures cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis of the knee: High resolution plain film and double contrast macroradiographic investigation

    J C Buckland-Wright;D G Macfarlane;J A Lynch;M K Jasani

  • Cartilage segmentation of 3D MRI scans of the osteoarthritic knee combining user knowledge and active contours

    John Andrew Lynch;Souhil Zaim;Jenny Zhao;Alexander Stork

  • The role of varus and valgus alignment in the initial development of knee cartilage damage by MRI: the MOST study

    Leena Sharma;Joan S Chmiel;Orit Almagor;David Felson

  • Tibiofemoral Joint Osteoarthritis: Risk Factors for MR-depicted Fast Cartilage Loss over a 30-month Period in the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study

    Frank W. Roemer;Yuqing Zhang;Jingbo Niu;John A. Lynch

  • Survey of Ontario Bulk Tank Raw Milk for Food-Borne Pathogens.

    Marina L. Steele;W. Bruce McNAB;Case Poppe;Mansel W. Griffiths

  • Assessment of synovitis with contrast-enhanced MRI using a whole-joint semiquantitative scoring system in people with, or at high risk of, knee osteoarthritis: the MOST study

    Ali Guermazi;Frank W Roemer;Daichi Hayashi;Michel D Crema

  • Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: Association with Low Back Pain

    Lorenzo Nardo;Hamza Alizai;Hamza Alizai;Warapat Virayavanich;Warapat Virayavanich;Felix Liu

  • Analysis of texture in macroradiographs of osteoarthritic knees using the fractal signature.

    J A Lynch;D J Hawkes;J C Buckland-Wright

  • Baseline mean and heterogeneity of MR cartilage T2 are associated with morphologic degeneration of cartilage, meniscus, and bone marrow over 3 years--data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

    G. B. Joseph;T. Baum;H. Alizai;H. Alizai;J. Carballido-Gamio

  • Effect of meniscal damage on the development of frequent knee pain, aching, or stiffness.

    Martin Englund;Martin Englund;J Niu;A Guermazi;F W Roemer;F W Roemer

  • Subchondral bone marrow lesions are highly associated with, and predict subchondral bone attrition longitudinally: the MOST study

    F W Roemer;F W Roemer;T Neogi;M C Nevitt;D T Felson

  • Patellar cartilage: T2 values and morphologic abnormalities at 3.0-T MR imaging in relation to physical activity in asymptomatic subjects from the osteoarthritis initiative

    Christoph Stehling;Hans Liebl;Hans Liebl;Roland Krug;Nancy E. Lane

  • Assessment of the Microbiological Quality of Ready-To-Use Vegetables for Health-Care Food Services.

    Joseph A. Odumeru;Sheila J. Mitchell;David M. Alves;John A. Lynch

  • Brief Report: Cartilage Thickness Change as an Imaging Biomarker of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression: Data From the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium.

    F. Eckstein;J. E. Collins;M. C. Nevitt;J. A. Lynch

  • Subjects with higher physical activity levels have more severe focal knee lesions diagnosed with 3T MRI: analysis of a non-symptomatic cohort of the osteoarthritis initiative.

    Christoph Stehling;Christoph Stehling;Nancy E. Lane;Michael C. Nevitt;John Lynch

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael C. Nevitt
Michael C. Nevitt University of California, San Francisco
Frank W. Roemer
Frank W. Roemer University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Ali Guermazi
Ali Guermazi Boston University
David T. Felson
David T. Felson Boston University
Thomas M. Link
Thomas M. Link University of California, San Francisco
Charles E. McCulloch
Charles E. McCulloch University of California, San Francisco
Jingbo Niu
Jingbo Niu Boston University
Nancy E. Lane
Nancy E. Lane University of California, Davis
Yuqing Zhang
Yuqing Zhang Harvard University
Cora E. Lewis
Cora E. Lewis University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking flexible education options, there are many rn to bsn online cost programs available. These online pathways can make advancing your nursing career more affordable and accessible, especially for working professionals.

If you hold a degree in another field, consider direct entry msn programs designed for non-nurses. These accelerated programs let you pursue advanced nursing roles quickly, helping you transition careers with minimal time investment.

For students exploring entry-level options, searching for the easiest rn program to get into may help you start your journey in nursing without the highly competitive admission standards some schools require.

If you are interested in healthcare but prefer non-clinical roles, look into medical billing and coding online schools. These programs offer flexible study and the potential for financial aid, opening doors to vital support positions in today’s medical system.

Best Scientists Citing John A. Lynch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles