World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 119 3813 3571 2089 1932 715 79151

Charles E. McCulloch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles E. McCulloch between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles E. McCulloch published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 22.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 72 publications in 2021. 59 of the 1,021 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 72. Peak 72 publications in 2021. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 5 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 28 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 36 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 43 publications 2012: 51 publications 2013: 40 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 49 publications 2016: 48 publications 2017: 42 publications 2018: 44 publications 2019: 59 publications 2020: 50 publications 2021: 72 publications 2022: 39 publications 2023: 52 publications 2024: 53 publications 2025: 50 publications 2026: 9 publications
1981 2026

1,021 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles E. McCulloch: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 5
1983 3
1984 3
1985 5
1986 2
1987 5
1988 3
1989 7
1990 6
1991 3
1992 3
1993 3
1994 9
1995 8
1996 8
1997 2
1998 5
1999 7
2000 9
2001 3
2002 13
2003 5
2004 21
2005 28
2006 23
2007 15
2008 36
2009 17
2010 29
2011 43
2012 51
2013 40
2014 33
2015 49
2016 48
2017 42
2018 44
2019 59
2020 50
2021 72
2022 39
2023 52
2024 53
2025 50
2026 9
Total 1,021
Download as CSV

Charles E. McCulloch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. McCulloch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 701–720 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 715 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307 715
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles E. McCulloch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. McCulloch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302 119
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Charles E. McCulloch is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research mainly focuses on Medicine, with specific contributions to several subfields including Rheumatology, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nephrology, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The scientist has authored numerous publications related to various medical topics. Main areas of work include:

  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Charles E. McCulloch has a record of publications in leading journals. Frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • Stroke
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • Pediatric Neurology

Some recent papers connected with their research include:

  • Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel, 2020, Radiology
  • Treatment-related changes in bone mineral density as a surrogate biomarker for fracture risk reduction: meta-regression analyses of individual patient data from multiple randomised controlled trials, 2020, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • Safety and efficacy of amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover, double-blind trial, 2020, The Lancet Neurology
  • Mucus Plugs and Emphysema in the Pathophysiology of Airflow Obstruction and Hypoxemia in Smokers, 2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Changes in frailty are associated with waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis, 2020, Journal of Hepatology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Elaine Ku
  • Gabby B. Joseph
  • Michael C. Nevitt
  • J.A. Lynch
  • Nancy E. Lane

Throughout their career, Charles E. McCulloch has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) since 1996.

Best Publications

  • Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization

    A.S. Go;G.M. Chertow;D. Fan;C.E. McCulloch

  • Relaxing the Rule of Ten Events per Variable in Logistic and Cox Regression

    Eric Vittinghoff;Charles E. McCulloch

  • Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models

    Charles E. McCulloch;Shayle R. Searle

  • Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models

    Eric Vittinghoff;David V. Glidden;Stephen C. Shiboski;Charles E. McCulloch

  • Body Mass Index and Risk for End-Stage Renal Disease

    Chi-yuan Hsu;Charles E. McCulloch;Carlos Iribarren;Jeanne Darbinian

  • MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS IN ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS: PANACEA OR PANDORA'S BOX?

    Frances C. James;Charles E. McCulloch

  • Functional Status of Elderly Adults before and after Initiation of Dialysis

    Manjula Kurella Tamura;Kenneth E. Covinsky;Glenn M. Chertow;Kristine Yaffe

  • Maximum Likelihood Algorithms for Generalized Linear Mixed Models

    Charles E. McCulloch

  • Generalized Linear Mixed Models

    Charles E. McCulloch;John M. Neuhaus

  • Community-based incidence of acute renal failure

    C.-y. Hsu;C.E. McCulloch;D. Fan;J.D. Ordoñez

  • Epidemiology of Anemia Associated with Chronic Renal Insufficiency among Adults in the United States: Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

    Chi-Yuan Hsu;Charles E McCulloch;Gary C Curhan

  • Risk factors for end-stage renal disease: 25-year follow-up.

    Chi-yuan Hsu;Carlos Iribarren;Charles E. McCulloch;Jeanne Darbinian

  • Dialysis-requiring acute renal failure increases the risk of progressive chronic kidney disease.

    Lowell J. Lo;Alan S. Go;Alan S. Go;Glenn M. Chertow;Charles E. McCulloch

  • The risk of acute renal failure in patients with chronic kidney disease

    C.Y. Hsu;J.D. Ordoñez;G.M. Chertow;D. Fan

  • Trends in prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States

    Daniel Murphy;Charles E. McCulloch;Feng Lin;Tanushree Banerjee

  • Elevated Blood Pressure and Risk of End-stage Renal Disease in Subjects Without Baseline Kidney Disease

    Chi-yuan Hsu;Charles E. McCulloch;Jeanne Darbinian;Alan S. Go

  • Temporal Changes in Incidence of Dialysis-Requiring AKI

    Raymond K. Hsu;Charles E. McCulloch;R. Adams Dudley;Lowell J. Lo

  • Aneurysm Growth Occurs at Region of Low Wall Shear Stress. Patient-Specific Correlation of Hemodynamics and Growth in a Longitudinal Study

    Loic Boussel;Vitaliy Rayz;Charles McCulloch;Alastair Martin

  • Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models: McCulloch/Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models

    Charles E. McCulloch;Shayle R. Searle

  • Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization

    AS Go;GM Chertow;D Fan

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael C. Nevitt
Michael C. Nevitt University of California, San Francisco
Thomas M. Link
Thomas M. Link University of California, San Francisco
John A. Lynch
John A. Lynch University of California, San Francisco
Chi-yuan Hsu
Chi-yuan Hsu University of California, San Francisco
Michael T. Lawton
Michael T. Lawton Barrow Neurological Institute
Kirsten L. Johansen
Kirsten L. Johansen University of Minnesota
Nancy E. Lane
Nancy E. Lane University of California, Davis
William L. Young
William L. Young University of California, San Francisco
Alan S. Go
Alan S. Go Kaiser Permanente
Neil R. Powe
Neil R. Powe University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring options beyond a traditional medical degree, a range of online healthcare programs can jump-start your career in the field. For those without a nursing background, online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses provide a fast-tracked pathway to advanced nursing roles.

Prospective nurses looking for a more accessible entry point may benefit from online adn programs, which offer flexible schedules and can be less competitive to enter. Some aspiring nurses also prefer to seek out a nursing school that doesn’t require teas, removing standardized exam barriers from the application process.

Not all healthcare careers require direct patient care. If you’re interested in administrative support, online medical coding classes with financial aid can open doors to vital roles in medical billing and healthcare data management.

These alternative online pathways provide a variety of options for those seeking flexibility, financial support, or a faster route into the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Charles E. McCulloch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles