World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
47
Citations
7794
World Ranking
2550
National Ranking
203

Matt Smith publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt Smith sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 139 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Matt Smith D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matt Smith is affiliated with the University of Worcester in the United Kingdom and has a research focus spanning Environmental Science, Medicine, and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work predominantly addresses topics related to allergic rhinitis and sensitization, lichen and fungal ecology, indoor air quality and microbial exposure, as well as tree-ring climate responses, air quality and health impacts, forest insect ecology and management, and botany and plant ecology studies.

Smith's publication record highlights research contributions in a range of scientific journals with frequent publications appearing in Aerobiologia, Grana, The Science of The Total Environment, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, and Global Change Biology. These venues host studies connected to environmental monitoring, bioaerosol dynamics, and climate impacts on biological systems.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Smith include:

  • Effects of future climate change on birch abundance and their pollen load, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • Consequences of climate change on airborne pollen in Bavaria, Central Europe, 2021, Regional Environmental Change
  • Recent developments in monitoring and modelling airborne pollen, a review, 2020, Grana
  • Bioaerosols on the atmospheric super highway: An example of long distance transport of Alternaria spores from the Pannonian Plain to Poland, 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Particle size distribution of the major Alternaria alternata allergen, Alt a 1, derived from airborne spores and subspore fragments, 2020, Fungal Biology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Smith include:

  • Łukasz Grewling
  • Branko Šikoparija
  • Jesús Rojo
  • José María Maya-Manzano
  • Athanasios Damialis

Smith's work crosses disciplinary boundaries, integrating aspects of immunology and allergy, health toxicology and mutagenesis, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, plant science, and atmospheric science.

Best Publications

  • Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments

    Stephen J. Thackeray;Timothy H. Sparks;Morten Frederiksen;Sarah Burthe

  • Pollen monitoring: minimum requirements and reproducibility of analysis

    C. Galán;M. Smith;M. Thibaudon;G. Frenguelli

  • Changes to Airborne Pollen Counts across Europe

    Chiara Ziello;Tim H. Sparks;Nicole Estrella;Jordina Belmonte

  • Recommended terminology for aerobiological studies

    C. Galán;A. Ariatti;M. Bonini;B. Clot

  • Common ragweed: a threat to environmental health in Europe.

    Matt Smith;L. Cecchi;C. Skjøth;G. Karrer

  • Biological Flora of the British Isles: Ambrosia artemisiifolia.

    Franz Essl;Franz Essl;Krisztina Biró;Dietmar Brandes;Olivier Broennimann

  • Variation of the group 5 grass pollen allergen content of airborne pollen in relation to geographic location and time in season.

    Jeroen Buters;Marje Prank;Mikhail Sofiev;Gudrun Pusch

  • The long‐range transport of birch (Betula) pollen from Poland and Germany causes significant pre‐season concentrations in Denmark

    C. Skjøth;J. Sommer;Alicja Stach;Matt Smith;Matt Smith

  • Release of Bet v 1 from birch pollen from 5 European countries. Results from the HIALINE study

    Jeroen T.M. Buters;Michel Thibaudon;Matt Smith;Roy Kennedy

  • Long-range transport of Ambrosia pollen to Poland

    Matthew Smith;Matthew Smith;C. Skjøth;D. Myszkowska;A. Uruska

  • Changes in the pollen seasons of the early flowering trees Alnus spp. and Corylus spp. in Worcester, United Kingdom, 1996-2005.

    Jean Emberlin;Matt Smith;Matt Smith;Rebecca Close;Beverley Adams-Groom

  • Geographic and temporal variations in pollen exposure across Europe.

    M. Smith;S. Jäger;U. Berger;B. Šikoparija

  • Examining Ambrosia pollen episodes at Poznań (Poland) using back-trajectory analysis

    Alicja Stach;Matt Smith;Matt Smith;C. Skjøth;J. Brandt

  • The onset, course and intensity of the pollen season

    Åslög Dahl;Carmen Galán;Lenka Hajkova;Andreas Pauling

  • A method for producing airborne pollen source inventories: an example of Ambrosia (ragweed) on the Pannonian Plain.

    Carsten A. Skjøth;Matt Smith;Branko Šikoparija;Alicja Stach

  • Characteristics of grass pollen seasons in areas of southern Spain and the United Kingdom

    Juan Antonio Sánchez Mesa;Matt Smith;Jean Emberlin;Ursula Allitt

  • The Pannonian plain as a source of Ambrosia pollen in the Balkans

    B. Šikoparija;Matt Smith;C. Skjøth;P. Radišić

  • Airborne olive pollen counts are not representative of exposure to the major olive allergen Ole e 1.

    C. Galan;C. Antunes;C. Antunes;R. Brandao;C. Torres

  • Analytical validation of a next generation sequencing liquid biopsy assay for high sensitivity broad molecular profiling.

    Vincent Plagnol;Samuel Woodhouse;Karen Howarth;Stefanie Lensing

  • Monitoring, Modelling and Forecasting of the Pollen Season

    Helfried Scheifinger;Jordina Belmonte;Jeroen Buters;Sevcan Celenk

  • Spread of invasive ragweed: climate change, management and how to reduce allergy costs.

    Robert Richter;Uwe E. Berger;Stefan Dullinger;Franz Essl;Franz Essl

  • Long-term and short-term forecast models for Poaceae (grass) pollen in Poznań, Poland, constructed using regression analysis

    Alicja Stach;Matt Smith;Matt Smith;J. C. Prieto Baena;J. C. Prieto Baena;Jean Emberlin

  • The Worldwide Spread, Success, and Impact of Ragweed (Ambrosia spp.)

    C. Montagnani;R. Gentili;Matt Smith;M. F. Guarino

  • Pollen season and climate: Is the timing of birch pollen release in the UK approaching its limit?

    R.M. Newnham;T.H. Sparks;C. Skjøth;C. Skjøth;K. Head

  • Airborne pollen transport.

    Mikhail Sofiev;Jordina Belmonte;Regula Gehrig;Rebeca Izquierdo

  • A Mechanism For Long Distance Transport of Ambrosia Pollen From the Pannonian Plain

    B. Šikoparija;C. Skjøth;C. Skjøth;K. Alm Kübler;Å. Dahl

  • Ragweed pollen source inventory for France – The second largest centre of Ambrosia in Europe

    Michel Thibaudon;Branko Šikoparija;Gilles Oliver;Matt Smith

  • A 30-day-ahead forecast model for grass pollen in north London, United Kingdom

    Matthew Smith;Jean Emberlin

Frequent Co-Authors

Carsten Ambelas Skjøth
Carsten Ambelas Skjøth Aarhus University
Jean Emberlin
Jean Emberlin University of Worcester
Carmen Galán
Carmen Galán University of Córdoba
Mikhail Sofiev
Mikhail Sofiev Finnish Meteorological Institute
Ole Hertel
Ole Hertel Aarhus University
Lorenzo Cecchi
Lorenzo Cecchi University of Florence
Jørgen Brandt
Jørgen Brandt Aarhus University
Heinz Müller-Schärer
Heinz Müller-Schärer University of Fribourg
Franz Essl
Franz Essl University of Vienna
Heidrun Behrendt
Heidrun Behrendt Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Matt Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles