World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
40
Citations
8054
World Ranking
6027
National Ranking
636

James R. Bell publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Bell sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 100 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

James R. Bell D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Bell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

James R. Bell is affiliated with Rothamsted Research in the United Kingdom and has conducted extensive research within the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science.

The scientist's work primarily concentrates on several subfields, including:

  • Insect Science
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Ecological Modeling
  • Genetics

Major topics covered in their research include:

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Insect and Pesticide Research

Recent publications authored or coauthored by James R. Bell highlight contributions to the ecology and insect research domains. These papers include:

  • "Are insects declining and at what rate? An analysis of standardised, systematic catches of aphid and moth abundances across Great Britain," 2020, published in Insect Conservation and Diversity
  • "Money spider dietary choice in pre- and post-harvest cereal crops using metabarcoding," 2020, published in Ecological Entomology
  • "Disorder or a new order: How climate change affects phenological variability," 2022, published in Ecology
  • "Density-independent prey choice, taxonomy, life history, and web characteristics determine the diet and biocontrol potential of spiders (Linyphiidae and Lycosidae) in cereal crops," 2021, published in Environmental DNA
  • "MEDI: Macronutrient Extraction and Determination from invertebrates, a rapid, cheap and streamlined protocol," 2021, published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Frequent coauthors involved in collaborative research projects with James R. Bell include:

  • Jordan P. Cuff
  • Maximillian P. T. G. Tercel
  • Ian P. Vaughan
  • William O. C. Symondson
  • C. R. Shortall

The scientist's work has been published in venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Rothamsted Repository
  • Ecological Entomology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Insect Conservation and Diversity

Best Publications

  • Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments

    Stephen J. Thackeray;Timothy H. Sparks;Morten Frederiksen;Sarah Burthe

  • Phenological sensitivity to climate across taxa and trophic levels

    Stephen J. Thackeray;Peter A. Henrys;Deborah Hemming;James R. Bell

  • Ballooning dispersal using silk: world fauna, phylogenies, genetics and models.

    J.R. Bell;D.A. Bohan;E.M. Shaw;G.S. Weyman

  • Handbook of protocols for standardized measurement of terrestrial invertebrate functional traits

    Marco Moretti;André T. C. Dias;Francesco de Bello;Francesco de Bello;Florian Altermatt;Florian Altermatt

  • Climate-induced phenology shifts linked to range expansions in species with multiple reproductive cycles per year

    Callum J. Macgregor;Chris D. Thomas;David B. Roy;Mark A. Beaumont

  • A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of the CRTH2 antagonist OC000459 in moderate persistent asthma

    N. Barnes;I. Pavord;A. Chuchalin;J. Bell

  • Detection of secondary predation by PCR analyses of the gut contents of invertebrate generalist predators.

    Samuel Keir Sheppard;J. Bell;K. D. Sunderland;J. Fenlon

  • The implications of grassland and heathland management for the conservation of spider communities: a review

    James R. Bell;James R. Bell;C. Philip Wheater;W. Rod Cullen

  • Long‐term phenological trends, species accumulation rates, aphid traits and climate: five decades of change in migrating aphids

    James R. Bell;Lynda Alderson;Daniela Izera;Tracey Kruger

  • Seasonal migration to high latitudes results in major reproductive benefits in an insect

    Jason W. Chapman;Jason W. Chapman;James R. Bell;Laura E. Burgin;Donald R. Reynolds;Donald R. Reynolds

  • Heightened response of eosinophilic asthmatic patients to the CRTH2 antagonist OC000459.

    R. Pettipher;M. G. Hunter;C. M. Perkins;L. P. Collins

  • Moth biomass increases and decreases over 50 years in Britain.

    Callum J Macgregor;Jonathan H Williams;James R Bell;Chris D Thomas

  • THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIC FARMING ON SURFACE-ACTIVE SPIDER (ARANEAE) ASSEMBLAGES IN WHEAT IN SOUTHERN ENGLAND, UK

    J. Bell;G. Firbank

  • Changes in large-scale climate alter spatial synchrony of aphid pests

    Lawrence W. Sheppard;James R. Bell;Richard Harrington;Daniel C. Reuman;Daniel C. Reuman

  • Prey choice by carabid beetles feeding on an earthworm community analysed using species- and lineage-specific PCR primers.

    R. Andrew King;Ian Phillip Vaughan;James R. Bell;James R. Bell;David A. Bohan

  • Are insects declining and at what rate? An analysis of standardised, systematic catches of aphid and moth abundances across Great Britain.

    James R. Bell;Dan Blumgart;Chris R. Shortall

  • Endoparasitism in cereal aphids: molecular analysis of a whole parasitoid community.

    M. Traugott;M. Traugott;J. R. Bell;J. R. Bell;J. R. Bell;G. R. Broad;W. Powell

  • Generalist predators disrupt parasitoid aphid control by direct and coincidental intraguild predation.

    Michael Traugott;J. R. Bell;L. Raso;D. Sint

  • Intraguild predation in winter wheat: prey choice by a common epigeal carabid consuming spiders

    Jeffrey S. Davey;Ian P. Vaughan;R. Andrew King;James R. Bell;James R. Bell

  • Practical Field Ecology: A Project Guide

    C. Philip. Wheater;James R. Bell;Penny A. Cook

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Harrington
Richard Harrington Rothamsted Research
David A. Bohan
David A. Bohan INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Tom Brereton
Tom Brereton Butterfly Conservation
Jason W. Chapman
Jason W. Chapman University of Exeter
James W. Pearce-Higgins
James W. Pearce-Higgins British Trust for Ornithology
Michael Traugott
Michael Traugott University of Innsbruck
Marc S. Botham
Marc S. Botham University of Leeds
Peter A. Henrys
Peter A. Henrys Natural Environment Research Council
Paul J. Tasker
Paul J. Tasker Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in Ecology and Evolution, several related online degrees can broaden your knowledge and enhance your job prospects. Core fields like biology are essential, but interdisciplinary skills are also increasingly valuable.

For those interested in quantitative analysis within ecology, exploring an online math bachelor's degree can provide strong statistical and data modeling abilities. Visual communication is crucial in science outreach and education, so creative learners may benefit from a best online graphic design degree to develop skills in presenting scientific information.

Interdisciplinary knowledge is highly valued in today's complex environmental challenges. Students seeking flexible learning options may want to explore cheap online interdisciplinary studies degree options, which allow you to tailor your studies to include environmental science, policy, or communication.

For advanced study, an online masters in history can deepen your understanding of ecological change over time, providing important context for modern conservation work.

Best Scientists Citing James R. Bell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles