World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
53
Citations
10123
World Ranking
3305
National Ranking
366

Tom Brereton publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Brereton sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 131 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Tom Brereton D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Brereton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tom Brereton is affiliated with Butterfly Conservation in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to environmental science and biological research, with a focus on ecology and species distribution. Their work spans topics related to plant and animal studies, species distribution and climate change, ecology and vegetation dynamics, marine animal studies, Lepidoptera biology and taxonomy, marine and fisheries research, as well as animal ecology and behavior studies.

Their research outputs have appeared in a number of scholarly journals, with frequent publications in Ecology and Evolution, Biodiversity Data Journal, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Journal of Applied Ecology, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Tom Brereton include:

  • Pollinator monitoring more than pays for itself, 2020, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Environmental drivers of annual population fluctuations in a trans-Saharan insect migrant, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The Role of Climate, Oceanography, and Prey in Driving Decadal Spatio-Temporal Patterns of a Highly Mobile Top Predator, 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Trends in butterfly populations in UK gardens-New evidence from citizen science monitoring, 2023, Insect Conservation and Diversity
  • Consistent concentrations of critically endangered Balearic shearwaters in UK waters revealed by at-sea surveys, 2021, Ecology and Evolution

Tom Brereton has collaborated frequently with a range of researchers. Their most frequent co-authors include David B. Roy, Emily B. Dennis, Tom H. Oliver, Kate E. Plummer, and Daria Dadam.

Their scientific work is rooted primarily in the fields of environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. They have a substantial body of work within the subfields of ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, ecological modeling, nature and landscape conservation, and genetics.

Main topics that describe their research focus are:

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Best Publications

  • Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments

    Stephen J. Thackeray;Timothy H. Sparks;Morten Frederiksen;Sarah Burthe

  • Phenological sensitivity to climate across taxa and trophic levels

    Stephen J. Thackeray;Peter A. Henrys;Deborah Hemming;James R. Bell

  • Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale

    Vincent Devictor;Chris van Swaay;Tom Brereton;Lluı´s Brotons

  • Climate-induced phenology shifts linked to range expansions in species with multiple reproductive cycles per year

    Callum J. Macgregor;Chris D. Thomas;David B. Roy;Mark A. Beaumont

  • Heterogeneous landscapes promote population stability

    Tom Oliver;David B. Roy;Jane K. Hill;Tom Brereton

  • Interacting effects of climate change and habitat fragmentation on drought-sensitive butterflies

    Tom H. Oliver;Harry H. Marshall;Mike D. Morecroft;Tom Brereton

  • Predicting insect phenology across space and time

    Jenny A Hodgson;Chris D Thomas;Tom H Oliver;Barbara J Anderson

  • Multi‐generational long‐distance migration of insects: studying the painted lady butterfly in the Western Palaearctic

    Constantí Stefanescu;Ferran Páramo;Susanne Åkesson;Marta Alarcón

  • Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning

    William J. Sutherland;Mark J. Bailey;Ian P. Bainbridge;Tom Brereton

  • Butterfly abundance is determined by food availability and is mediated by species traits

    Robin J. Curtis;Robin J. Curtis;Tom M. Brereton;Roger L. H. Dennis;Chris Carbone

  • The development of butterfly indicators in the United Kingdom and assessments in 2010

    T. Brereton;D. B. Roy;I. Middlebrook;M. Botham

  • The state of butterflies in Britain and Ireland

    R. Fox;J. Asher;T. Brereton;David B. Roy

  • The state of the UK’s butterflies 2015

    R. Fox;T.M. Brereton;J. Asher;T.A. August

  • Changes in habitat specificity of species at their climatic range boundaries

    Tom Oliver;Jane K. Hill;Chris D. Thomas;Tom Brereton

  • Range expansion through fragmented landscapes under a variable climate

    Jonathan Bennie;Jenny A. Hodgson;Jenny A. Hodgson;Callum R. Lawson;Crispin T.R. Holloway

  • Sensitivity of UK butterflies to local climatic extremes: which life stages are most at risk?

    Osgur McDermott Long;Rachel Warren;Jeff Price;Tom M. Brereton

  • Are neonicotinoid insecticides driving declines of widespread butterflies

    Andre S. Gilburn;Nils Bunnefeld;John McVean Wilson;Marc S. Botham

  • The re-expansion and improving status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain: a metapopulation success story

    Zoe G. Davies;Robert J. Wilson;Tom M. Brereton;Chris D. Thomas

  • Climate change, climatic variation and extreme biological responses.

    Georgina Palmer;Philip J. Platts;Tom Brereton;Jason W. Chapman;Jason W. Chapman

  • Distance sampling and the challenge of monitoring butterfly populations

    Nick J. B. Isaac;Katie L. Cruickshanks;Ann M. Weddle;Ann M. Weddle;J. Marcus Rowcliffe

  • Abundance changes and habitat availability drive species’ responses to climate change

    Louise Mair;Jane K. Hill;Richard Fox;Marc Botham

Frequent Co-Authors

David B. Roy
David B. Roy UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Tom H. Oliver
Tom H. Oliver University of Reading
Marc S. Botham
Marc S. Botham University of Leeds
Richard Fox
Richard Fox Butterfly Conservation
Chris D. Thomas
Chris D. Thomas University of York
Constantí Stefanescu
Constantí Stefanescu Autonomous University of Barcelona
James W. Pearce-Higgins
James W. Pearce-Higgins British Trust for Ornithology
Jane K. Hill
Jane K. Hill University of York
Nick J. B. Isaac
Nick J. B. Isaac University College London
Josef Settele
Josef Settele Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their studies or pivoting their careers, a variety of online degree options exist that complement knowledge in Ecology and Evolution. Healthcare and nursing programs are particularly flexible and accessible, offering pathways such as adn to fnp bridges for registered nurses aiming to become Family Nurse Practitioners.

Individuals from non-nursing backgrounds may also consider intensive programs like online direct entry msn programs. These allow for a swift transition into advanced nursing roles, catering to the rising demand for healthcare professionals who think analytically and adapt across specialties.

Choosing the right institution is important when pursuing these online pathways. Comparing programs can be beneficial, especially when wondering which school is better snhu vs wgu. Cost is also a major consideration, and researching the cheapest bsn to msn online offerings helps ensure education remains affordable.

Whether you’re aiming for a career in healthcare or seeking a flexible degree to complement your expertise in ecology, exploring these diverse online options allows you to tailor your education and career path to your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Tom Brereton

Trending Scientists