World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
31
Citations
5344
World Ranking
8194
National Ranking
799

Peter A. Henrys publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Henrys sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 111 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Peter A. Henrys D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Henrys sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter A. Henrys is affiliated with the Natural Environment Research Council in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on various subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Artificial Intelligence, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Peter A. Henrys has contributed to publications in several venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Patterns
  • Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  • Environmental Pollution
  • Ecography

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Is more data always better? A simulation study of benefits and limitations of integrated distribution models, 2020, Ecography
  • Predicting disease risk areas through co-production of spatial models: The example of Kyasanur Forest Disease in India's forest landscapes, 2020, PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • Long-term rise in riverine dissolved organic carbon concentration is predicted by electrolyte solubility theory, 2023, Science Advances
  • Patterns and trends of topsoil carbon in the UK: Complex interactions of land use change, climate and pollution, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • A new approach to characterising and predicting crop rotations using national-scale annual crop maps, 2022, The Science of The Total Environment

The scientist often collaborates with a group of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Susan G. Jarvis
  • Gordon S. Blair
  • John Watkins
  • Bridget A. Emmett
  • Simon M. Smart

Best Publications

  • Phenological sensitivity to climate across taxa and trophic levels

    Stephen J. Thackeray;Peter A. Henrys;Deborah Hemming;James R. Bell

  • Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees.

    B. A. Woodcock;J. M. Bullock;R. F. Shore;M. S. Heard

  • Data Integration for Large-Scale Models of Species Distributions

    Nick J.B. Isaac;Marta A. Jarzyna;Petr Keil;Lea I. Dambly

  • Warming effects on greenhouse gas fluxes in peatlands are modulated by vegetation composition.

    Susan E. Ward;Nicholas J. Ostle;Simon Oakley;Helen Quirk

  • Spatial patterns reveal negative density dependence and habitat associations in tropical trees.

    Robert Bagchi;Robert Bagchi;Peter A. Henrys;Patrick E. Brown;Patrick E. Brown;David F R P Burslem

  • Line transect methods for plant surveys.

    S. T. Buckland;D. L. Borchers;A. Johnston;A. Johnston;P. A. Henrys;P. A. Henrys

  • Do early warning indicators consistently predict nonlinear change in long‐term ecological data?

    Sarah J. Burthe;Peter A. Henrys;Eleanor B. Mackay;Bryan M. Spears

  • Exploring the ecological constraints to multiple ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity

    Lindsay C. Maskell;Andrew Crowe;Michael J. Dunbar;Bridget Emmett

  • Trends in the hydrochemistry of acid-sensitive surface waters in the UK 1988–2008

    D.T. Monteith;C.D. Evans;P.A. Henrys;G.L. Simpson

  • Relationship between the concentrations of dissolved organic matter and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a typical U.K. upland stream

    Claudia Moeckel;Donald T. Monteith;Neville R. Llewellyn;Peter A. Henrys

  • A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe : Methods, case studies and policy analysis - phase 2 Synthesis report

    Joachim Maes;Jennifer Hauck;Maria Luisa Paracchini;Outi Ratamäki

  • Countryside Survey: National “Soil Change” 1978–2007 for Topsoils in Great Britain—Acidity, Carbon, and Total Nitrogen Status

    B. Reynolds;P.M. Chamberlain;J. Poskitt;C. Woods

  • Is more data always better? A simulation study of benefits and limitations of integrated distribution models

    Emily G. Simmonds;Susan G. Jarvis;Peter A. Henrys;Nick J. B. Isaac

  • Food web de‐synchronization in England's largest lake: an assessment based on multiple phenological metrics

    Stephen J. Thackeray;Peter A. Henrys;Heidrun Feuchtmayr;Ian D. Jones

  • Long-term increases in soil carbon due to ecosystem fertilization by atmospheric nitrogen deposition demonstrated by regional-scale modelling and observations.

    Edward William Tipping;Jessica Davies;P. A. Henrys;G. J. D. Kirk

  • Exploring relationships between land use intensity, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity to identify and monitor areas of High Nature Value farming

    L.C. Maskell;M. Botham;P. Henrys;S. Jarvis

  • Long-term rise in riverine dissolved organic carbon concentration is predicted by electrolyte solubility theory

    Unknown

  • The importance of inorganic carbon in soil carbon databases and stock estimates: a case study from England

    Barry G. Rawlins;Peter A. Henrys;Neil Breward;David A. Robinson

  • Spatial and habitat variation in aphid, butterfly, moth and bird phenologies over the last half century.

    James R. Bell;Marc S. Botham;Peter A. Henrys;David I. Leech

  • Predicting disease risk areas through co-production of spatial models: The example of Kyasanur Forest Disease in India’s forest landscapes

    Bethan V. Purse;Narayanaswamy Darshan;Narayanaswamy Darshan;Gudadappa S. Kasabi

  • Trends in the hydrochemistry of acid-sensitive surface waters in the UK

    D. T. Monteith;C. D. Evans;P. A. Henrys;G. L. Simpson

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon M. Smart
Simon M. Smart Lancaster University
Bridget A. Emmett
Bridget A. Emmett Natural Environment Research Council
Chris D. Evans
Chris D. Evans UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Don Monteith
Don Monteith Lancaster University
Carly J. Stevens
Carly J. Stevens Lancaster University
Stephen J. Thackeray
Stephen J. Thackeray Lancaster University
Marc S. Botham
Marc S. Botham University of Leeds
Gordon S. Blair
Gordon S. Blair Lancaster University
David A. Robinson
David A. Robinson UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Gavin M. Siriwardena
Gavin M. Siriwardena British Trust for Ornithology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Ecology and Evolution, there are many related online degrees and career paths to explore. For those interested in the intersection of environmental issues and human well-being, a clinical psychology degree online can open doors to working in mental health with a focus on communities affected by environmental change.

Alternatively, if your goal is to support individuals and communities directly, a human services bachelors degree online allows you to gain practical skills quickly, often with flexible online study options.

Teaching professionals who are curious about branching out may have wondered, can you become a speech pathologist with an education degree? Exploring this career shift reveals opportunities for those who already work in education but wish to specialize further.

For those fascinated by the built environment and sustainability, online architecture degree programs can combine ecological knowledge with design, highlighting the connection between nature, people, and structures.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. Henrys

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles