World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10135 9485 94 92 64 5799

Long W. Lam publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Long W. Lam between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Long W. Lam published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2012. 9 of the 95 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2012. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
1998 2026

95 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Long W. Lam: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 3
2009 0
2010 1
2011 2
2012 9
2013 4
2014 5
2015 2
2016 5
2017 5
2018 9
2019 8
2020 8
2021 6
2022 5
2023 4
2024 5
2025 8
2026 1
Total 95
Download as CSV

Long W. Lam publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Long W. Lam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 64 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 64
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Long W. Lam D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Long W. Lam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Long W. Lam is affiliated with the University of Macau in China. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a primary focus on Business, Management and Accounting as well as Psychology. Their work covers key subfields including Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's research topics prominently address Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Ethics in Business and Education, Workaholism, Burnout and Well-being, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Knowledge Management and Sharing, Cultural Differences and Values, and the Impact of Technology on Adolescents.

Long W. Lam has coauthored extensively, with frequent collaborators including Julie N.Y. Zhu, Anise M. S. Wu, Meng Xuan Zhang, Nai-Wen Chi, and Na Li.

Their publications appear regularly in notable academic venues, with a higher concentration of work published in the following sources:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Business Ethics
  • Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Management and Organization Review
  • Personnel Review

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Doing It Purposely? Mediation of Moral Disengagement in the Relationship Between Illegitimate Tasks and Counterproductive Work Behavior," 2021, Journal of Business Ethics
  • "Should companies invest in human resource development practices? The role of intellectual capital and organizational performance improvements," 2020, Personnel Review
  • "A cross-lagged panel model for testing the bidirectional relationship between depression and smartphone addiction and the influences of maladaptive metacognition on them in Chinese adolescents," 2021, Addictive Behaviors
  • "Obligations and feeling envied: a study of workplace status and knowledge hiding," 2020, Journal of Managerial Psychology
  • "Sensory marketing in hospitality: a critical synthesis and reflection," 2022, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management

Best Publications

  • Impact of competitiveness on salespeople's commitment and performance ☆

    Long W. Lam

  • The bad boss takes it all: How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to influence employee silence

    Angela J. Xu;Raymond Loi;Long W. Lam

  • Leader–member exchange, organizational identification, and job satisfaction: A social identity perspective

    Raymond Loi;Ka W. Chan;Long W. Lam

  • Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: Exploring dual-mediation paths

    Yuen Lam Bavik;Pok Man Tang;Ruodan Shao;Long Wai Lam

  • Does the look matter? The impact of casino servicescape on gaming customer satisfaction, intention to revisit, and desire to stay.

    Long W. Lam;Ka Wai Chan;Davis Fong;Freda Lo

  • Coping with Job Insecurity: The Role of Procedural Justice, Ethical Leadership and Power Distance Orientation

    Raymond Loi;Long W. Lam;Ka Wai Chan

  • Feeling lonely at work: investigating the consequences of unsatisfactory workplace relationships

    Long W. Lam;Dora C. Lau

  • Examining the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors in the workplace: A self-evaluative perspective

    Dora C. Lau;Long W. Lam;Shan S. Wen

  • How locus of control shapes intention to reuse mobile apps for making hotel reservations: Evidence from chinese consumers

    Lawrence Hoc Nang Fong;Long Wai. Lam;Rob Law

  • Human resource orientation and corporate performance

    Long W. Lam;Louis P. White

  • Linking organizational identification and employee performance in teams: the moderating role of team-member exchange

    Yan Liu;Raymond Loi;Long W. Lam

  • The effect of online reviews on hotel booking intention: The role of reader-reviewer similarity

    Irene Cheng Chu Chan;Long W. Lam;Cheris W.C. Chow;Lawrence Hoc Nang Fong

  • Power Imbalance and Employee Silence: The Role of Abusive Leadership, Power Distance Orientation, and Perceived Organisational Politics

    Long W. Lam;Angela J. Xu

  • Working under a committed boss: A test of the relationship between supervisors' and subordinates' affective commitment

    Raymond Loi;Jennifer Y.M. Lai;Long W. Lam

  • The identity-based explanation of affective commitment

    Long W. Lam;Yan Liu

  • Voice More and Stay Longer: How Ethical Leaders Influence Employee Voice and Exit Intentions

    Long W. Lam;Raymond Loi;Ka Wai Chan;Yan Liu

  • Defining who you are not: The roles of moral dirtiness and occupational and organizational disidentification in affecting casino employee turnover intention

    Jennifer Y.M. Lai;K.W. Chan;Long W. Lam

  • Is More Feedback Seeking Always Better? Leader-Member Exchange Moderates the Relationship Between Feedback-Seeking Behavior and Performance:

    Long Wai Lam;Kelly Z. Peng;Chi-Sum Wong;Dora C. Lau

  • The impact of relational demographics on perceived managerial trustworthiness: similarity or norms?

    Dora C Lau;Long W Lam;Sabrina Deutsch Salamon

  • Doing It Purposely? Mediation of Moral Disengagement in the Relationship Between Illegitimate Tasks and Counterproductive Work Behavior

    Lijing Zhao;Long W. Lam;Julie N. Y. Zhu;Shuming Zhao

  • Effects of trusting and being trusted on team citizenship behaviours in chain stores

    Dora C. Lau;Long W. Lam

  • Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A team cultural perspective

    Jennifer Y. M. Lai;Long W. Lam;Simon S. K. Lam

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond Loi
Raymond Loi University of Macau
John Schaubroeck
John Schaubroeck University of Missouri
Chi-Sum Wong
Chi-Sum Wong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Rob Law
Rob Law University of Macau
Anise M. S. Wu
Anise M. S. Wu University of Macau
Ajai S. Gaur
Ajai S. Gaur Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Christopher C. Rosen
Christopher C. Rosen University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Simon S. K. Lam
Simon S. K. Lam University of Hong Kong
Hang-yue Ngo
Hang-yue Ngo University of Manchester
Seung Hyun Lee
Seung Hyun Lee The University of Texas at Dallas

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in psychology, exploring online degree options can open doors to a variety of roles, from clinical settings to research, education, or corporate work. Many universities across the United States now offer flexible online programs with rigorous curricula and expert faculty.

When researching programs, it’s helpful to review successful options in different regions. For example, the most popular psychology degree programs in Orlando offer comprehensive tracks for both undergraduate and graduate students. In the West, the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Reno are recognized for alumni success and practical training.

Those interested in the Pacific Northwest may find the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Seattle stand out for their research opportunities and connections to local clinics. Additionally, the best-ranked psychology degree programs in University, MS are known for their supportive communities and personalized academic guidance.

Completing an online psychology degree can help you prepare for roles like counselor, researcher, human resources specialist, or mental health advocate, while also providing a path toward advanced graduate studies if desired.

Best Scientists Citing Long W. Lam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles