World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
67
Citations
23235
World Ranking
357
National Ranking
167

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
23451
World Ranking
2445
National Ranking
1418

John Schaubroeck publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Schaubroeck sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 131 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

John Schaubroeck D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Schaubroeck sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

John Schaubroeck is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within psychology and business management, with specific contributions to organizational behavior, human resource management, social psychology, and related subfields.

The scientist's research topics include job satisfaction and organizational behavior, employment and welfare studies, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, COVID-19 and mental health, optimism, hope, and well-being, as well as migration, refugees, and integration and related health and trauma issues.

John Schaubroeck has published extensively in a number of academic journals and proceedings. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Academy of Management Journal
  • Psychology in the Schools
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by John Schaubroeck cover a range of themes on leadership, social identity processes, and occupational behavior:

  • "Struggling to Meet the Bar: Occupational Progress Failure and Informal Leadership Behavior", 2020, Academy of Management Journal
  • ""I" Am Affirmed, but Are "We"? Social Identity Processes Influencing Refugees' Work Initiative and Community Embeddedness", 2021, Academy of Management Journal
  • "Social support as a source of vitality among college students: The moderating role of social self-efficacy", 2020, Psychology in the Schools (co-author)
  • "Can Humble Leaders Get Results? The Indirect and Contextual Influences of Skip-Level Leaders", 2020, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies (co-author)
  • "How is leadership maintained? A longitudinal mediation model linking informal leadership to upward voice through peer advice seeking.", 2022, Journal of Applied Psychology (co-author)

Collaborations form a noticeable aspect of their research activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ann C. Peng
  • Dongchul Kim
  • Wei Zeng
  • Chunyan Peng
  • Jingjing Ma

John Schaubroeck's work spans multiple topics and disciplinary fields, reflecting expertise in the intersection of psychological and managerial facets of workplace behavior and social dynamics. The scientist was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2015, indicating acknowledgment by a professional body within their field of psychology.

Best Publications

  • A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings.

    Michael M. Harris;John Schaubroeck

  • Leader Personality Traits and Employee Voice Behavior: Mediating Roles of Ethical Leadership and Work Group Psychological Safety

    Fred O. Walumbwa;John Schaubroeck

  • Work Stress and Employee Health

    Daniel C. Ganster;John Schaubroeck

  • Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance.

    John Schaubroeck;Simon S. K. Lam;Ann Chunyan Peng

  • Embracing transformational leadership: team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance.

    John Schaubroeck;Simon S. K. Lam;Sandra E. Cha

  • RETRACTED: Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors

    Fred O. Walumbwa;Peng Wang;Hui Wang;John Schaubroeck

  • Embedding Ethical Leadership within and across Organization Levels

    John Schaubroeck;Sean T. Hannah;Bruce J. Avolio;Steve W. J. Kozlowski

  • Antecedents of workplace emotional labor dimensions and moderators of their effects on physical symptoms

    John Schaubroeck;James R. Jones

  • Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: a cross‐national study

    Simon S. K. Lam;John Schaubroeck;Samuel Aryee

  • The influence of leaders' and other referents' normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work

    Abraham Carmeli;John Schaubroeck

  • Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures

    Reuven Hirak;Ann Chunyan Peng;Abraham Carmeli;John M. Schaubroeck;John M. Schaubroeck

  • Lack of sleep and unethical conduct

    Christopher M. Barnes;John Schaubroeck;Megan Huth;Sonia Ghumman

  • Antecedents and consequences of role stress: A covariance structure analysis

    John Schaubroeck;John L. Cotton;Kenneth R. Jennings

  • Divergent Effects Of Job Control On Coping With Work Stressors: The Key Role Of Self-Efficacy

    John Schaubroeck;Deryl E. Merritt

  • Participative Decision Making and Employee Performance in Different Cultures: The Moderating Effects of Allocentrism/Idiocentrism and Efficacy

    Simon S K Lam;Xiao Ping Chen;John Schaubroeck

  • Comparing lots before and after: Promotion rejectees' invidious reactions to promotees.

    John Schaubroeck;Simon S.K Lam

  • Abusive Supervision

    Unknown

  • Collective efficacy versus self-efficacy in coping responses to stressors and control: A cross-cultural study

    John Schaubroeck;Simon S. K. Lam;Jia Lin Xie

  • HOW SIMILARITY TO PEERS AND SUPERVISOR INFLUENCES ORGANIZATIONAL ADVANCEMENT IN DIFFERENT CULTURES

    John Schaubroeck;Simon S. K. Lam

  • Procedural justice explanations and employee reactions to economic hardship: A field experiment

    John Schaubroeck;Douglas R. May;F. William Brown

  • Dispositional affect and work-related stress.

    John Schaubroeck;Daniel C. Ganster;Marilyn L. Fox

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon S. K. Lam
Simon S. K. Lam University of Hong Kong
Daniel C. Ganster
Daniel C. Ganster Colorado State University
Sean T. Hannah
Sean T. Hannah Wake Forest University
Long W. Lam
Long W. Lam University of Macau
Bruce J. Avolio
Bruce J. Avolio University of Washington
Fred O. Walumbwa
Fred O. Walumbwa Florida International University
Steve W. J. Kozlowski
Steve W. J. Kozlowski University of South Florida
Jason D. Shaw
Jason D. Shaw Nanyang Technological University
Linda Klebe Treviño
Linda Klebe Treviño Pennsylvania State University
Robert G. Lord
Robert G. Lord Durham University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering your options for advancing in Business and Management? Online degree programs offer flexibility and affordability, helping professionals upskill without interrupting their careers. Choosing the right program means balancing cost, reputation, and potential career outcomes.

If you're interested in financial management, understanding the cost of accounting degree online can help you make an informed choice on budgeting for your education. For those exploring cutting-edge technology in leadership, you might compare the cheapest online masters in artificial intelligence to gain tech skills that are highly valued in today's market.

Alternatively, a degree in construction management prepares you for complex project leadership roles in a growing sector. For experienced professionals, an emba online can offer advanced management skills, preparing you for executive positions.

By exploring these diverse online pathways, you can align your studies with personal career goals while managing costs and maximizing flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing John Schaubroeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles