World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5833 5421 3165 2871 94 12946

Sean T. Hannah publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sean T. Hannah between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sean T. Hannah published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2011. 6 of the 103 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2011. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
2005 2025

103 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sean T. Hannah: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 2
2008 2
2009 5
2010 10
2011 13
2012 11
2013 10
2014 8
2015 5
2016 4
2017 4
2018 1
2019 2
2020 10
2021 5
2022 0
2023 4
2024 3
2025 3
Total 103
Download as CSV

Sean T. Hannah publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sean T. Hannah sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 94
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sean T. Hannah D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sean T. Hannah sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sean T. Hannah is affiliated with Wake Forest University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Psychology, with a focus on Organizational Behavior, Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Strategy and Management, and Accounting.

The scientist's work extensively covers various topics including:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Sean T. Hannah has published in several academic venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
  • Journal of Management Studies
  • Human Relations
  • Journal of Business Ethics

Among recent papers authored by Sean T. Hannah are:

  • Bolstering Workplace Psychological Well-Being Through Transactional and Transformational Leadership, 2020, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
  • The Direct and Moderating Effects of Endogenous Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Valuation: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence from the Global Financial Crisis, 2020, Journal of Management Studies

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Sean T. Hannah include:

  • Bruce J. Avolio
  • Paul B. Lester
  • John J. Sumanth
  • Dustin Bluhm
  • Nir Milstein

Best Publications

  • A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts

    Sean T. Hannah;Mary Uhl-Bien;Bruce J. Avolio;Fabrice L. Cavarretta

  • A meta-analytic review of leadership impact research: Experimental and quasi-experimental studies

    Bruce J. Avolio;Rebecca J. Reichard;Sean T. Hannah;Fred O. Walumbwa

  • Embedding Ethical Leadership within and across Organization Levels

    John Schaubroeck;Sean T. Hannah;Bruce J. Avolio;Steve W. J. Kozlowski

  • Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions

    Sean T. Hannah;Bruce Avolio;Fred Luthans;Peter D. Harms

  • Relationships between Authentic Leadership, Moral Courage, and Ethical and Pro-Social Behaviors

    Sean T. Hannah;Bruce J. Avolio;Fred O. Walumbwa

  • DEVELOPMENTAL READINESS: ACCELERATING LEADER DEVELOPMENT

    Bruce J. Avolio;Sean T. Hannah

  • Moral Maturation and Moral Conation: A Capacity Approach to Explaining Moral Thought and Action

    Sean Timothy Hannah;Bruce J. Avolio;Douglas R. May

  • A multilevel approach to building and leading learning organizations

    Sean T. Hannah;Paul B. Lester

  • Leader development and the dark side of personality

    Peter D. Harms;Seth M. Spain;Sean T. Hannah

  • The moral self: A review and integration of the literature

    Peter L. Jennings;Marie S. Mitchell;Sean T. Hannah

  • RETRACTED: The relationship between authentic leadership and follower job performance: The mediating role of follower positivity in extreme contexts

    Suzanne J. Peterson;Fred O. Walumbwa;Bruce J. Avolio;Sean T. Hannah

  • Moral potency: Building the capacity for character-based leadership.

    Sean T. Hannah;Bruce J. Avolio

  • Mentoring Impact on Leader Efficacy Development: A Field Experiment

    Paul B. Lester;Sean T. Hannah;Peter D. Harms;Gretchen R. Vogelgesang

  • Developing trust with peers and leaders: Impacts on organizational identification and performance during entry

    John M. Schaubroeck;Ann Chunyan Peng;Sean T. Hannah

  • Leader self-structure: A framework for positive leadership

    Sean T. Hannah;Robert L. Woolfolk;Robert L. Woolfolk;Robert G. Lord

  • The Moderated Influence of Ethical Leadership, Via Meaningful Work, on Followers’ Engagement, Organizational Identification, and Envy

    Ozgur Demirtas;Sean T. Hannah;Kubilay Gok;Aykut Arslan

  • The psychological and neurological bases of leader self-complexity and effects on adaptive decision-making.

    Sean T. Hannah;Pierre A. Balthazard;David A. Waldman;Peter L. Jennings

  • LEADERSHIP IN ACTION TEAMS: TEAM LEADER AND MEMBERS’ AUTHENTICITY, AUTHENTICITY STRENGTH, AND TEAM OUTCOMES

    Sean T. Hannah;Fred O. Walumbwa;Louis W. Fry

  • RETRACTED: Impact of spiritual leadership on unit performance

    Louis W. Fry;Sean T. Hannah;Michael Noel;Fred O. Walumbwa

  • Ready or not: How do we accelerate the developmental readiness of leaders?

    Sean T. Hannah;Bruce J. Avolio

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce J. Avolio
Bruce J. Avolio University of Washington
Fred O. Walumbwa
Fred O. Walumbwa Florida International University
Robert G. Lord
Robert G. Lord Durham University
Steve W. J. Kozlowski
Steve W. J. Kozlowski University of South Florida
David A. Waldman
David A. Waldman Arizona State University
John Schaubroeck
John Schaubroeck University of Missouri
Louis W. Fry
Louis W. Fry Texas A&M University
Peter D. Harms
Peter D. Harms University of Alabama
Linda Klebe Treviño
Linda Klebe Treviño Pennsylvania State University
James Campbell Quick
James Campbell Quick The University of Texas at Arlington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to numerous career pathways and specialized certifications. Many students are now considering online degrees due to their flexibility, which can be especially helpful for fulfilling prerequisites and gaining practical experience required for credentials like the Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA).

For those interested in applied behavior analysis, requirements can differ by state. You may want to learn more about the bcba certification requirements in Virginia or discover important steps outlined in how to become a bcba in Washington. Understanding state-specific paths helps students plan their degree and supervised experience efficiently.

If you are aiming to begin your career in other regions, check details about the West Virginia bcba education requirements or the process for becoming a bcba in Wisconsin. Knowing these differences ensures you select the right online program and practicum opportunities aligned with your state’s pathway.

Considering an online degree can be a strategic first step toward a meaningful and in-demand career in psychology, counseling, or behavior analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Sean T. Hannah

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles