World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4424 4094 289 268 254 10484

Mark R. Beauchamp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark R. Beauchamp between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark R. Beauchamp published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2025. 28 of the 297 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2025. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 9 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 27 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

297 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark R. Beauchamp: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 2
2003 4
2004 0
2005 10
2006 0
2007 7
2008 4
2009 1
2010 9
2011 12
2012 12
2013 8
2014 23
2015 17
2016 18
2017 15
2018 20
2019 15
2020 25
2021 20
2022 12
2023 19
2024 13
2025 27
2026 1
Total 297
Download as CSV

Mark R. Beauchamp publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Beauchamp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 254 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201 254
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark R. Beauchamp D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Beauchamp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark R. Beauchamp is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily centers on the fields of psychology and medicine, with a strong emphasis on applied psychology, physiology, social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and public health. Their academic output covers a broad spectrum of behavioral science and health-related topics.

Their work encompasses key topics including behavioral health and interventions, physical activity and health, obesity, physical activity, and diet, motivation and self-concept in sports, children's physical and motor development, sport psychology and performance, as well as COVID-19 and mental health.

Mark R. Beauchamp has contributed to several academic publications in notable venues. The frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Their recent scholarly articles include the following:

  • "A classification system for teachers' motivational behaviors recommended in self-determination theory interventions." (2023), Journal of Educational Psychology
  • "The effects of exercise intensity on the cortisol response to a subsequent acute psychosocial stressor." (2021), Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • "What Happens When the Party is Over?: Sustaining Physical Activity Behaviors after Intervention Cessation." (2020), Behavioral Medicine
  • "Online-Delivered Group and Personal Exercise Programs to Support Low Active Older Adults' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Trial." (2021), Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Tailored physical activity behavior change interventions: challenges and opportunities." (2021), Translational Behavioral Medicine

Their work is often conducted in collaboration with a range of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Ryan E. Rhodes
  • Eli Puterman
  • Benjamin A. Hives
  • David R. Lubans
  • Guy Faulkner

Best Publications

  • Physical Activity for Cognitive and Mental Health in Youth: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms.

    David Lubans;Justin Richards;Charles H. Hillman;Guy Faulkner

  • The Effectiveness of Teamwork Training on Teamwork Behaviors and Team Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Interventions

    Desmond McEwan;Geralyn R. Ruissen;Mark A. Eys;Bruno D. Zumbo

  • The effectiveness of multi-component goal setting interventions for changing physical activity behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Desmond McEwan;Samantha M. Harden;Bruno D. Zumbo;Benjamin D. Sylvester

  • Role ambiguity, role efficacy, and role performance: Multidimensional and mediational relationships within interdependent sport teams.

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Steven R. Bray;Mark A. Eys;Albert V. Carron

  • Social cognitive theory and physical activity: Mechanisms of behavior change, critique, and legacy

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Kaitlin L. Crawford;Ben Jackson

  • Teamwork in sport: a theoretical and integrative review

    Desmond McEwan;Mark R. Beauchamp

  • High-Intensity Interval Training as an Efficacious Alternative to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Adults with Prediabetes

    Mary E. Jung;Jessica E. Bourne;Mark R. Beauchamp;Emily Robinson

  • Framework for the design and delivery of organized physical activity sessions for children and adolescents: rationale and description of the 'SAAFE' teaching principles

    David R. Lubans;Chris Lonsdale;Kristen Cohen;Narelle Eather

  • Older adults' preferences for exercising alone versus in groups: considering contextual congruence.

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Albert V. Carron;Serena McCutcheon;Oliver Harper

  • The effectiveness of motivational interviewing for health behaviour change in primary care settings: a systematic review

    Katie Morton;Mark Beauchamp;Anna Prothero;Lauren Joyce

  • Role ambiguity and role conflict within interdependent teams

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Steven R. Bray

  • Pre-competition imagery, self-efficacy and performance in collegiate golfers

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Steven R. Bray;John G. Albinson

  • Examining the active ingredients of physical activity interventions underpinned by theory versus no stated theory: a meta-analysis.

    Desmond McEwan;Mark R Beauchamp;Christina Kouvousis;Christina M Ray

  • The Relationship Between Task Cohesion and Competitive State Anxiety

    Mark A. Eys;James Hardy;Albert V. Carron;Mark R. Beauchamp

  • Development and Psychometric Properties of the Transformational Teaching Questionnaire

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Julian Barling;Zhen Li;Katie L. Morton

  • Affective responses of inactive women to a maximal incremental exercise test: A test of the dual-mode model

    Amy S. Welch;Angie Hulley;Carrie Ferguson;Mark R. Beauchamp

  • Role ambiguity and athlete satisfaction.

    Mark A. Eys;Albert V. Carron;Steven R. Bray;Mark R. Beauchamp

  • Transformational Teaching and Adolescent Self-Determined Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Intentions to Engage in Leisure Time Physical Activity: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Julian Barling;Katie L. Morton

  • Relational efficacy beliefs and relationship quality within coach-athlete dyads:

    Ben Jackson;J. Robert Grove;Mark R. Beauchamp

  • Group-based physical activity for older adults (GOAL) randomized controlled trial: Exercise adherence outcomes.

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Geralyn R. Ruissen;William L. Dunlop;Paul A. Estabrooks

  • Transformational and transactional leadership and exercise-related self-efficacy: an exploratory study.

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Amy S. Welch;Angie J. Hulley

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryan E. Rhodes
Ryan E. Rhodes University of Victoria
Ben Jackson
Ben Jackson University of Western Australia
Bruno D. Zumbo
Bruno D. Zumbo University of British Columbia
Mark A. Eys
Mark A. Eys Wilfrid Laurier University
David R. Lubans
David R. Lubans University of Newcastle Australia
Albert V. Carron
Albert V. Carron University of Western Ontario
Steven R. Bray
Steven R. Bray McMaster University
Julian Barling
Julian Barling Queen's University
Martyn Standage
Martyn Standage University of Bath
Louise C. Mâsse
Louise C. Mâsse University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology is closely linked with fields such as social work, counseling, and human services. Students studying psychology in the USA often consider adding or transitioning to these related online degrees, which can open up diverse career opportunities. An advanced degree in social work, for example, allows graduates to support communities, advocate for social change, and work directly with individuals in need.

Choosing where to study is important. If you're looking at top programs in the South, check out the best social work programs in Nashville. For those interested in opportunities in the Midwest, you might explore the best social work degrees in North Dakota. The Northeast is also home to many reputable schools—browse the best social work degree programs in the Northeast for more ideas. The Southwest offers unique programs as well, including the best social work programs in Oklahoma.

Pursuing a related online degree helps students tailor their education to fit their professional goals, whether in clinical settings, schools, or community organizations. These programs are designed to be flexible, making it easier to balance work and study while advancing your career.

Best Scientists Citing Mark R. Beauchamp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles