World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
10484
World Ranking
4424
National Ranking
289

Mark R. Beauchamp publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Beauchamp sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 254 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark R. Beauchamp D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Beauchamp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark R. Beauchamp is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily centers on the fields of psychology and medicine, with a strong emphasis on applied psychology, physiology, social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and public health. Their academic output covers a broad spectrum of behavioral science and health-related topics.

Their work encompasses key topics including behavioral health and interventions, physical activity and health, obesity, physical activity, and diet, motivation and self-concept in sports, children's physical and motor development, sport psychology and performance, as well as COVID-19 and mental health.

Mark R. Beauchamp has contributed to several academic publications in notable venues. The frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Their recent scholarly articles include the following:

  • "A classification system for teachers' motivational behaviors recommended in self-determination theory interventions." (2023), Journal of Educational Psychology
  • "The effects of exercise intensity on the cortisol response to a subsequent acute psychosocial stressor." (2021), Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • "What Happens When the Party is Over?: Sustaining Physical Activity Behaviors after Intervention Cessation." (2020), Behavioral Medicine
  • "Online-Delivered Group and Personal Exercise Programs to Support Low Active Older Adults' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Trial." (2021), Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Tailored physical activity behavior change interventions: challenges and opportunities." (2021), Translational Behavioral Medicine

Their work is often conducted in collaboration with a range of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Ryan E. Rhodes
  • Eli Puterman
  • Benjamin A. Hives
  • David R. Lubans
  • Guy Faulkner

Best Publications

  • Physical Activity for Cognitive and Mental Health in Youth: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms.

    David Lubans;Justin Richards;Charles H. Hillman;Guy Faulkner

  • The Effectiveness of Teamwork Training on Teamwork Behaviors and Team Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Interventions

    Desmond McEwan;Geralyn R. Ruissen;Mark A. Eys;Bruno D. Zumbo

  • The effectiveness of multi-component goal setting interventions for changing physical activity behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Desmond McEwan;Samantha M. Harden;Bruno D. Zumbo;Benjamin D. Sylvester

  • Role ambiguity, role efficacy, and role performance: Multidimensional and mediational relationships within interdependent sport teams.

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Steven R. Bray;Mark A. Eys;Albert V. Carron

  • Social cognitive theory and physical activity: Mechanisms of behavior change, critique, and legacy

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Kaitlin L. Crawford;Ben Jackson

  • Teamwork in sport: a theoretical and integrative review

    Desmond McEwan;Mark R. Beauchamp

  • High-Intensity Interval Training as an Efficacious Alternative to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Adults with Prediabetes

    Mary E. Jung;Jessica E. Bourne;Mark R. Beauchamp;Emily Robinson

  • Framework for the design and delivery of organized physical activity sessions for children and adolescents: rationale and description of the 'SAAFE' teaching principles

    David R. Lubans;Chris Lonsdale;Kristen Cohen;Narelle Eather

  • Older adults' preferences for exercising alone versus in groups: considering contextual congruence.

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Albert V. Carron;Serena McCutcheon;Oliver Harper

  • The effectiveness of motivational interviewing for health behaviour change in primary care settings: a systematic review

    Katie Morton;Mark Beauchamp;Anna Prothero;Lauren Joyce

  • Role ambiguity and role conflict within interdependent teams

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Steven R. Bray

  • Pre-competition imagery, self-efficacy and performance in collegiate golfers

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Steven R. Bray;John G. Albinson

  • Examining the active ingredients of physical activity interventions underpinned by theory versus no stated theory: a meta-analysis.

    Desmond McEwan;Mark R Beauchamp;Christina Kouvousis;Christina M Ray

  • The Relationship Between Task Cohesion and Competitive State Anxiety

    Mark A. Eys;James Hardy;Albert V. Carron;Mark R. Beauchamp

  • Development and Psychometric Properties of the Transformational Teaching Questionnaire

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Julian Barling;Zhen Li;Katie L. Morton

  • Affective responses of inactive women to a maximal incremental exercise test: A test of the dual-mode model

    Amy S. Welch;Angie Hulley;Carrie Ferguson;Mark R. Beauchamp

  • Role ambiguity and athlete satisfaction.

    Mark A. Eys;Albert V. Carron;Steven R. Bray;Mark R. Beauchamp

  • Transformational Teaching and Adolescent Self-Determined Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Intentions to Engage in Leisure Time Physical Activity: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Julian Barling;Katie L. Morton

  • Relational efficacy beliefs and relationship quality within coach-athlete dyads:

    Ben Jackson;J. Robert Grove;Mark R. Beauchamp

  • Group-based physical activity for older adults (GOAL) randomized controlled trial: Exercise adherence outcomes.

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Geralyn R. Ruissen;William L. Dunlop;Paul A. Estabrooks

  • Transformational and transactional leadership and exercise-related self-efficacy: an exploratory study.

    Mark R. Beauchamp;Amy S. Welch;Angie J. Hulley

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryan E. Rhodes
Ryan E. Rhodes University of Victoria
Ben Jackson
Ben Jackson University of Western Australia
Bruno D. Zumbo
Bruno D. Zumbo University of British Columbia
Mark A. Eys
Mark A. Eys Wilfrid Laurier University
David R. Lubans
David R. Lubans University of Newcastle Australia
Albert V. Carron
Albert V. Carron University of Western Ontario
Steven R. Bray
Steven R. Bray McMaster University
Julian Barling
Julian Barling Queen's University
Martyn Standage
Martyn Standage University of Bath
Louise C. Mâsse
Louise C. Mâsse University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology is closely linked with fields such as social work, counseling, and human services. Students studying psychology in the USA often consider adding or transitioning to these related online degrees, which can open up diverse career opportunities. An advanced degree in social work, for example, allows graduates to support communities, advocate for social change, and work directly with individuals in need.

Choosing where to study is important. If you're looking at top programs in the South, check out the best social work programs in Nashville. For those interested in opportunities in the Midwest, you might explore the best social work degrees in North Dakota. The Northeast is also home to many reputable schools—browse the best social work degree programs in the Northeast for more ideas. The Southwest offers unique programs as well, including the best social work programs in Oklahoma.

Pursuing a related online degree helps students tailor their education to fit their professional goals, whether in clinical settings, schools, or community organizations. These programs are designed to be flexible, making it easier to balance work and study while advancing your career.

Best Scientists Citing Mark R. Beauchamp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles