World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8513 7949 500 489 164 7297

James A. Dimmock publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James A. Dimmock between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James A. Dimmock published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2021. 16 of the 205 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2021. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 5 publications
2003 2025

205 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James A. Dimmock: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 0
2005 2
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 8
2010 12
2011 4
2012 8
2013 11
2014 12
2015 17
2016 17
2017 16
2018 10
2019 9
2020 14
2021 20
2022 10
2023 11
2024 11
2025 5
Total 205
Download as CSV

James A. Dimmock publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Dimmock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 164 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 164
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James A. Dimmock D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Dimmock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James A. Dimmock is affiliated with the University of Western Australia in Australia. Their primary research spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a considerable focus on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Applied Psychology, and Social Psychology.

Their research addresses several key topics, notably Behavioral Health and Interventions, Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Physical Activity and Health, Obesity, Physical Activity, and Diet, Cardiac Health and Mental Health, Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies, and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction.

James A. Dimmock has contributed to a number of peer-reviewed articles, including the following recent publications:

  • Relationships between social interactions, basic psychological needs, and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021, Psychology and Health
  • Music Listening Predicted Improved Life Satisfaction in University Students During Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Effects of diurnal exercise timing on appetite, energy intake and body composition: A parallel randomized trial, 2021, Appetite
  • Fruit and vegetable intake is inversely associated with perceived stress across the adult lifespan, 2021, Clinical Nutrition
  • Overweight and obese men's experiences in a sport-based weight loss intervention for men, 2020, Psychology of sport and exercise

The scientist frequently publishes in several journals, including:

  • Psychology of sport and exercise
  • Psychology and Health
  • Journal of science and medicine in sport
  • F1000Research
  • Appetite

James A. Dimmock collaborates frequently with other researchers, such as:

  • Ben Jackson
  • Timothy Budden
  • Lauren C. Blekkenhorst
  • Jonathan M. Hodgson
  • Mandy Stanley

Best Publications

  • Towards an Understanding of Mental Toughness in Australian Football

    Daniel F. Gucciardi;Sandy Gordon;James A. Dimmock

  • A review of return to sport concerns following injury rehabilitation: Practitioner strategies for enhancing recovery outcomes

    Leslie W. Podlog;James Dimmock;John Miller

  • Advancing mental toughness research and theory using personal construct psychology

    Daniel F. Gucciardi;Sandy Gordon;James A. Dimmock

  • Evaluation of a Mental Toughness Training Program for Youth-Aged Australian Footballers: I. A Quantitative Analysis

    Daniel F. Gucciardi;Sandy Gordon;James A. Dimmock

  • A systematic review of the effects of non-conscious regulatory processes in physical activity

    Amanda L. Rebar;James A. Dimmock;Ben Jackson;Ryan E. Rhodes

  • Choking under pressure in sensorimotor skills: Conscious processing or depleted attentional resources?

    Daniel F. Gucciardi;James A. Dimmock

  • Development and preliminary validation of a mental toughness inventory for Australian football

    Daniel F. Gucciardi;Sandy Gordon;James A. Dimmock

  • Reconceptualizing Team Identification: New Dimensions and Their Relationship to Intergroup Bias

    James A. Dimmock;J. Robert Grove;Robert C. Eklund

  • Development and preliminary validation of the mindfulness inventory for sport

    Emilie Thienot;Emilie Thienot;Ben Jackson;James Dimmock;J. Robert Grove

  • Understanding the coach’s role in the development of mental toughness: Perspectives of elite Australian football coaches

    Daniel F. Gucciardi;Sandy Gordon;James A. Dimmock;Clifford J. Mallett

  • Experienced golfers' perspectives on choking under pressure.

    Daniel F. Gucciardi;Jay Lee Longbottom;Ben Jackson;James A. Dimmock

  • Relationship of Fan Identification to Determinants of Aggression

    James A. Dimmock;J. Robert Grove

  • Persuading Others to Avoid Persuasion: Inoculation Theory and Resistant Health Attitudes

    Josh Compton;Ben Jackson;James A. Dimmock

  • An intervention to improve teachers' interpersonally involving instructional practices in high school physical education: Implications for student relatedness support and in-class experiences

    Cassandra Sparks;Chris Lonsdale;James A. Dimmock;Ben Jackson

  • The Effects of Choice on Autonomous Motivation, Perceived Autonomy Support, and Physical Activity Levels in High School Physical Education.

    Yew Meng How;Peter R. Whipp;James A. Dimmock;Ben Jackson

  • Generalizing the Team Identification-Psychological Health Model to a Different Sport and Culture: The Case of Australian Rules Football

    Daniel L. Wann;James A. Dimmock;J. Robert Grove

  • Self-determined motivation in sport predicts anti-doping motivation and intention: A perspective from the trans-contextual model

    D.K.C. Chan;J.A. Dimmock;R.J. Donovan;Sarah Hardcastle

  • The role of implicit and explicit components of exerciser self-schema in the prediction of exercise behaviour

    Lauren K. Banting;James A. Dimmock;Brendan S. Lay

  • Personality traits and relationship perceptions in coach–athlete dyads: Do opposites really attract?

    Ben Jackson;James A. Dimmock;Daniel F. Gucciardi;J. Robert Grove

  • Music Listening Predicted Improved Life Satisfaction in University Students During Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Amanda E. Krause;James Dimmock;Amanda L. Rebar;Ben Jackson

  • Modal salient belief and social cognitive variables of anti-doping behaviors in sport: Examining an extended model of the theory of planned behavior

    Derwin King Chung Chan;Sarah Hardcastle;James A. Dimmock;Vanessa Lentillon-Kaestner

Frequent Co-Authors

Ben Jackson
Ben Jackson University of Western Australia
Daniel F. Gucciardi
Daniel F. Gucciardi Curtin University
J. Robert Grove
J. Robert Grove University of Western Australia
Martin S. Hagger
Martin S. Hagger University of California, Merced
Amanda L. Rebar
Amanda L. Rebar Central Queensland University
Derwin King Chung Chan
Derwin King Chung Chan Hong Kong Metropolitan University
Leslie Podlog
Leslie Podlog University of Montreal
Sarah J. Hardcastle
Sarah J. Hardcastle Sheffield Hallam University
Jonathan M. Hodgson
Jonathan M. Hodgson Edith Cowan University
Ryan E. Rhodes
Ryan E. Rhodes University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up a variety of online education options and rewarding career paths. Many students choose to specialize in fields such as counseling or speech therapy, both of which often require state-specific licensure and certifications. For example, future counselors who intend to practice in Wisconsin should review the lpc licensure requirements in Wisconsin to ensure they meet all educational and supervised experience prerequisites.

In Wyoming, the process can differ, so understanding how to get an lpc license in Wyoming is crucial for anyone considering a counseling career there. Similarly, speech-language pathologists must adhere to specific state guidelines. Those interested in becoming a speech therapist in Alabama or becoming a speech therapist in Alaska will encounter unique licensing processes, which typically involve accredited graduate programs and supervised clinical experience.

With the flexibility of online degrees, aspiring professionals can tailor their education to meet licensing requirements in various states, paving the way for fulfilling careers in counseling and speech-language pathology.

Best Scientists Citing James A. Dimmock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles