World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6691 6233 394 384 191 8318

Amanda L. Rebar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amanda L. Rebar between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amanda L. Rebar published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 14.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2021. 29 of the 232 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2021. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 18 publications
2010 2025

232 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amanda L. Rebar: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 0
2012 0
2013 2
2014 12
2015 18
2016 17
2017 24
2018 23
2019 18
2020 23
2021 27
2022 20
2023 18
2024 11
2025 18
Total 232
Download as CSV

Amanda L. Rebar publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda L. Rebar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 191 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 191
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Amanda L. Rebar D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda L. Rebar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Amanda L. Rebar is affiliated with Central Queensland University in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a notable focus on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Physiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Social Psychology.

Their work addresses several main topics including Behavioral Health and Interventions, Physical Activity and Health, Sleep and related disorders, Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, Obesity, Physical Activity, and Diet, as well as Mobile Health and mHealth Applications.

Rebar's recent publications include:

  • Does habit weaken the relationship between intention and behaviour? Revisiting the habit-intention interaction hypothesis (2020, Social and Personality Psychology Compass)
  • Music Listening Predicted Improved Life Satisfaction in University Students During Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • Go to bed! A systematic review and meta-analysis of bedtime procrastination correlates and sleep outcomes (2022, Sleep Medicine Reviews)
  • Evolution of physical activity habits after a context change: The case of COVID-19 lockdown (2021, British Journal of Health Psychology)
  • How does habit form? Guidelines for tracking real-world habit formation (2022, Cogent Psychology)

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Benjamin Gardner
  • Corneel Vandelanotte
  • Grace E. Vincent
  • Sally A. Ferguson
  • Mitch J. Duncan

Amanda L. Rebar has published extensively in several academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets are:

  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • SLEEP Advances
  • Psychology and Health
  • British Journal of Health Psychology
  • Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being

In addition to journal articles, Rebar has contributed to book publications, including:

  • Essentials of exercise and sport psychology: An open access textbook (2021), published by Society for Transparency, Openness, and Replication in Kinesiology eBooks

Best Publications

  • A meta-meta-analysis of the effect of physical activity on depression and anxiety in non-clinical adult populations

    Amanda L Rebar;Robert Stanton;David Geard;Camille Short

  • Theories of physical activity behaviour change: A history and synthesis of approaches

    Ryan E. Rhodes;Desmond McEwan;Amanda L. Rebar

  • Apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents: a review of quality, features and behaviour change techniques

    Stephanie Schoeppe;Stephanie Alley;Amanda L. Rebar;Melanie Hayman

  • A systematic review of the effects of non-conscious regulatory processes in physical activity

    Amanda L. Rebar;James A. Dimmock;Ben Jackson;Ryan E. Rhodes

  • Moving to Beat Anxiety: Epidemiology and Therapeutic Issues with Physical Activity for Anxiety

    Aaron Kandola;Davy Vancampfort;Matthew P. Herring;Amanda Rebar

  • Habit formation and behavior change

    Benjamin David Gardner;Amanda L Rebar

  • The subjective experience of habit captured by self-report indexes may lead to inaccuracies in the measurement of habitual action

    Martin S. Hagger;Amanda L. Rebar;Barbara Mullan;Ottmar V. Lipp

  • Conceptualizing and Defining the Intention Construct for Future Physical Activity Research.

    Ryan E Rhodes;Amanda L Rebar

  • Designing engaging online behaviour change interventions: A proposed model of user engagement

    Camille E. Short;Amanda L. Rebar;Ronald C. Plotnikoff;Corneel Vandelanotte

  • Examining the Interplay of Processes Across Multiple Time-Scales: Illustration With the Intraindividual Study of Affect, Health, and Interpersonal Behavior (iSAHIB)

    Nilam Ram;David E. Conroy;Aaron L. Pincus;Amy Lorek

  • Child sun safety: Application of an Integrated Behavior Change model.

    Kyra Hamilton;Aaron Kirkpatrick;Amanda Rebar;Martin S. Hagger

  • The Measurement of Habit

    Amanda L. Rebar;Benjamin Gardner;Ryan E. Rhodes;Bas Verplanken

  • Music Listening Predicted Improved Life Satisfaction in University Students During Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Amanda E. Krause;James Dimmock;Amanda L. Rebar;Ben Jackson

  • Habits Predict Physical Activity on Days When Intentions Are Weak

    Amanda L. Rebar;Steriani Elavsky;Jaclyn P. Maher;Shawna E. Doerksen

  • Daily physical activity and alcohol use across the adult lifespan.

    David E. Conroy;Nilam Ram;Aaron L. Pincus;Donna L. Coffman

  • Physical Activity Habit: Complexities and Controversies

    Ryan E. Rhodes;Amanda L. Rebar

  • Ecological Momentary Assessment Is a Feasible and Valid Methodological Tool to Measure Older Adults' Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.

    Jaclyn P. Maher;Amanda L. Rebar;Genevieve F. Dunton

  • The association between implicit attitudes toward physical activity and physical activity behaviour: a systematic review and correlational meta-analysis

    Guillaume Chevance;Paquito Bernard;Pier Eric Chamberland;Amanda Rebar

  • Enriching Psychological Assessment Using a Person-Specific Analysis of Interpersonal Processes in Daily Life

    Michael J. Roche;Aaron L. Pincus;Amanda L. Rebar;David E. Conroy

  • Measuring implicit attitudes toward physical activity and sedentary behaviors: Test-retest reliability of three scoring algorithms of the Implicit Association Test and Single Category-Implicit Association Test

    Guillaume Chevance;Nelly Héraud;Agata Guerrieri;Amanda Rebar

  • Implicit attitudes and explicit motivation prospectively

    David E. Conroy;Amanda. Rebar;Shawna E. Doerksen;Nuno F. Ribeiro

Frequent Co-Authors

Mitch J. Duncan
Mitch J. Duncan University of Newcastle Australia
Benjamin Gardner
Benjamin Gardner University of Surrey
David E. Conroy
David E. Conroy Pennsylvania State University
Ryan E. Rhodes
Ryan E. Rhodes University of Victoria
Martin S. Hagger
Martin S. Hagger University of California, Merced
James A. Dimmock
James A. Dimmock University of Western Australia
Ben Jackson
Ben Jackson University of Western Australia
Ronald C. Plotnikoff
Ronald C. Plotnikoff University of Newcastle Australia
Nilam Ram
Nilam Ram Stanford University
Aaron L. Pincus
Aaron L. Pincus Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology degrees in the USA opens the door to several related fields, with counseling being one of the most popular pathways. Online counseling programs offer flexibility for students balancing work, family, and other commitments, making this career option more accessible than ever.

Many universities across the country provide specialized online degrees in counseling. For example, the best counseling degree programs in Ohio are recognized for their strong academic foundations and clinical training. Similarly, those interested in studying further west can explore the top counseling degree programs in Oklahoma. Each location offers unique strengths, from faculty expertise to internship opportunities.

Major metropolitan areas are also excellent hubs for aspiring counselors. The top counseling degree programs in Saint Louis combine urban clinical experiences with academic rigor, while the best counseling degree programs in San Diego are noted for innovative training in diverse settings.

Graduates in these fields can pursue careers as licensed counselors, school psychologists, mental health advocates, or continue toward advanced research and academic roles. Exploring these options can help you find the best fit for your career ambitions within psychology and related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Amanda L. Rebar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles