World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
110
Citations
49362
World Ranking
394
National Ranking
250

Martin S. Hagger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin S. Hagger sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 575 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Martin S. Hagger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin S. Hagger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin S. Hagger is affiliated with the University of California, Merced in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a particular emphasis on applied psychology, social psychology, and clinical psychology. The scientist has contributed extensively to the understanding of behavioral health and interventions, motivation and self-concept in sports, environmental education and sustainability, social and intergroup psychology, COVID-19 and mental health, physical activity and health, and health policy implementation science.

Hagger has a strong publication record across various scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Psychology and Health
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being
  • Social Science & Medicine
  • Health Psychology Review

Some of the notable recent papers by Hagger include:

  • "Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis" (2022) published in Health Psychology
  • "The common sense model of illness self-regulation: a conceptual review and proposed extended model" (2021) published in Health Psychology Review
  • "Predicting Social Distancing Intention and Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrated Social Cognition Model" (2020) published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Other influential research works associated with Hagger include:

  • "A classification of motivation and behavior change techniques used in self-determination theory-based interventions in health contexts" (2020) published in Motivation Science
  • "A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect" (2021) published in Psychological Science

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Kyra Hamilton
  • Taru Lintunen
  • Daniel J. Phipps
  • Jacob J. Keech
  • Nelli Hankonen

Hagger's scholarly contributions span 181 publications in psychology, with notable activity in subfields such as applied psychology (104 publications), social psychology (44), general health professions (35), sociology and political science (24), and clinical psychology (21).

Best Publications

  • Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis.

    Martin S. Hagger;Chantelle Wood;Chris Stiff;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior in Physical Activity: Predictive Validity and the Contribution of Additional Variables

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L.D. Chatzisarantis;Stuart J.H. Biddle

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations

    Martin S. Hagger;Sheina Orbell

  • A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • The Processes by Which Perceived Autonomy Support in Physical Education Promotes Leisure-Time Physical Activity Intentions and Behavior: A Trans-Contextual Model

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis;Trudi Culverhouse;Stuart J. H. Biddle

  • Integrating the theory of planned behaviour and self-determination theory in health behaviour: A meta-analysis

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport.

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation.

    Nikos L.D. Chatzisarantis;Martin S. Hagger

  • Implementation intention and action planning interventions in health contexts: state of the research and proposals for the way forward.

    Martin S. Hagger;Aleksandra Luszczynska;Aleksandra Luszczynska

  • The relationship between perfectionism and psychopathology: a meta-analysis

    Karina Limburg;Karina Limburg;Hunna J. Watson;Martin S. Hagger;Sarah J. Egan

  • A Meta-Analysis of Perceived Locus of Causality in Exercise, Sport, and Physical Education Contexts.

    Nikos Chatzisarantis;Martin S. Hagger;Stuart J. H. Biddle;Brett Smith

  • The Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation: Meta-Analysis and Test of a Process Model

    Martin S. Hagger;Severine Koch;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis;Sheina Orbell

  • The influence of self-efficacy and past behaviour on the physical activity intentions of young people

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos Chatzisarantis;Stuart J.H. Biddle

  • Development of executive function and attention in preterm children: a systematic review.

    Hanna Mulder;Nicola J Pitchford;Martin S Hagger;Neil Marlow

  • Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity : A cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis;Vassilis Barkoukis;C. K. John Wang

  • Mindfulness and the Intention-Behavior Relationship Within the Theory of Planned Behavior

    Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis;Martin S. Hagger

  • The influence of autonomous and controlling motives on physical activity intentions within the Theory of Planned Behaviour

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis;Stuart J. H. Biddle

  • A Classification of Motivation and Behavior Change Techniques Used in Self-Determination Theory-Based Interventions in Health Contexts

    Pedro J. Teixeira;Marta M. Marques;Marlene N. Silva;Jennifer Brunet

  • Self-determination Theory and the psychology of exercise

    Martin Hagger;Nikos Chatzisarantis

  • From Psychological Need Satisfaction to Intentional Behavior: Testing a Motivational Sequence in Two Behavioral Contexts

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis;Jemma Harris

  • Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation

    M. Hagger;N. Chatzisarantis

Frequent Co-Authors

Kyra Hamilton
Kyra Hamilton Griffith University
Sarah J. Hardcastle
Sarah J. Hardcastle Sheffield Hallam University
Sheina Orbell
Sheina Orbell University of Essex
Stuart J. H. Biddle
Stuart J. H. Biddle University of Southern Queensland
Barbara Mullan
Barbara Mullan Curtin University
James A. Dimmock
James A. Dimmock University of Western Australia
Nikos Ntoumanis
Nikos Ntoumanis University of Southern Denmark
Amanda L. Rebar
Amanda L. Rebar Central Queensland University
Vassilis Barkoukis
Vassilis Barkoukis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in psychology but need flexibility, accredited online psychology degree programs can help you start or advance your career. These online degrees are widely recognized and allow you to study at your own pace while gaining knowledge in critical areas such as counseling, human development, and behavioral science.

For those seeking advanced roles like clinical psychologist, consider exploring online accredited psyd programs. These programs prepare students for licensure and clinical practice, emphasizing applied skills and practical experience.

Alternatively, if applied behavior analysis is your passion, aba doctorate programs are ideal for careers in behavioral consultation, education, or research. Graduates are equipped to create behavior change strategies and conduct impactful research in a variety of settings.

Psychology isn't limited to clinical practice. There are also growing business careers with psychology degree. This unique focus blends psychological insight with business acumen, opening doors to roles in human resources, organizational development, and market research.

Best Scientists Citing Martin S. Hagger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles