World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
77
Citations
26905
World Ranking
1632
National Ranking
77

Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 184 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis is affiliated with Curtin University in Australia and has a research focus primarily in the field of psychology. Their work spans several subfields, including social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, sociology and political science, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist has contributed to topics such as behavioral health and interventions, motivation and self-concept in sports, mental health research topics, death anxiety and social exclusion, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes, as well as psychological well-being and life satisfaction. Research also extends to psychological and temporal perspectives.

Among recent publications are several articles encompassing experimental paradigms and meta-analytical studies. Notable papers include:

  • "A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect," 2021, Psychological Science
  • "Ironic Effects of Thought Suppression: A Meta-Analysis," 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "A Review and Empirical Comparison of Motivation Scoring Methods: An Application to Self-Determination Theory," 2020, Motivation and Emotion
  • "Effects of a School-Based Intervention on Motivation for Out-of-School Physical Activity Participation," 2020, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
  • "Loudness Perceptions Influence Feelings of Interpersonal Closeness and Protect Against Detrimental Psychological Effects of Social Exclusion," 2021, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Frequent collaborators in their research include Martin S. Hagger, Sviatlana Kamarova, Deming Wang, Αθανάσιος Παπαϊωάννου, and Kathleen D. Vohs. Publication venues reflect a distribution across widely recognized journals in psychology and related disciplines such as Psychological Science, Perspectives on Psychological Science, Motivation and Emotion, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Best Publications

  • Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis.

    Martin S. Hagger;Chantelle Wood;Chris Stiff;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior in Physical Activity: Predictive Validity and the Contribution of Additional Variables

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L.D. Chatzisarantis;Stuart J.H. Biddle

  • A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • The Processes by Which Perceived Autonomy Support in Physical Education Promotes Leisure-Time Physical Activity Intentions and Behavior: A Trans-Contextual Model

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis;Trudi Culverhouse;Stuart J. H. Biddle

  • Integrating the theory of planned behaviour and self-determination theory in health behaviour: A meta-analysis

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport.

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation.

    Nikos L.D. Chatzisarantis;Martin S. Hagger

  • A Meta-Analysis of Perceived Locus of Causality in Exercise, Sport, and Physical Education Contexts.

    Nikos Chatzisarantis;Martin S. Hagger;Stuart J. H. Biddle;Brett Smith

  • Research methods in sport and exercise psychology: quantitative and qualitative issues

    Stuart J.H. Biddle;David Markland;David Gilbourne;Nikos L.D. Chatzisarantis

  • The Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation: Meta-Analysis and Test of a Process Model

    Martin S. Hagger;Severine Koch;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis;Sheina Orbell

  • The influence of self-efficacy and past behaviour on the physical activity intentions of young people

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos Chatzisarantis;Stuart J.H. Biddle

  • Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity : A cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis;Vassilis Barkoukis;C. K. John Wang

  • Mindfulness and the Intention-Behavior Relationship Within the Theory of Planned Behavior

    Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis;Martin S. Hagger

  • The influence of autonomous and controlling motives on physical activity intentions within the Theory of Planned Behaviour

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis;Stuart J. H. Biddle

  • Self-determination Theory and the psychology of exercise

    Martin Hagger;Nikos Chatzisarantis

  • From Psychological Need Satisfaction to Intentional Behavior: Testing a Motivational Sequence in Two Behavioral Contexts

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis;Jemma Harris

  • AN INTEGRATED BEHAVIOR CHANGE MODEL FOR PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

    M. Hagger;Nikos Chatzisarantis

  • First- and higher-order models of attitudes, normative influence, and perceived behavioural control in the theory of planned behaviour.

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • Motivation for physical activity in young people: entity and incremental beliefs about athletic ability

    Stuart J H Biddle;C K John Wang;Nikos L D Chatzisarantis;Christopher M Spray

  • Teacher, peer and parent autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: A trans-contextual model of motivation in four nations

    Martin Hagger;Nikos L D Chatzisarantis;Vello Hein;István Soós

  • Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation

    M. Hagger;N. Chatzisarantis

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin S. Hagger
Martin S. Hagger University of California, Merced
Stuart J. H. Biddle
Stuart J. H. Biddle University of Southern Queensland
Nikos Ntoumanis
Nikos Ntoumanis University of Southern Denmark
Sarah J. Hardcastle
Sarah J. Hardcastle Sheffield Hallam University
Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani
Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani University of Southern Denmark
Derwin King Chung Chan
Derwin King Chung Chan Hong Kong Metropolitan University
Vassilis Barkoukis
Vassilis Barkoukis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Brett Smith
Brett Smith Durham University
Costas I. Karageorghis
Costas I. Karageorghis Brunel University London
Christopher M. Spray
Christopher M. Spray Loughborough University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to many rewarding careers, especially in counseling and mental health. One prominent pathway is becoming a substance abuse counselor—a role in high demand across the country. Online degrees in psychology and counseling provide flexible options for those aiming to begin or advance their careers in this field.

However, requirements for becoming a licensed substance abuse counselor can vary by city and state. It’s essential to understand the specific qualifications for your desired location. For example, you can review the substance abuse counselor requirements in Boise to get detailed guidance if you plan to work in Idaho. Similarly, those seeking employment in Massachusetts should examine the substance abuse counselor requirements in Boston.

Interested professionals in New York can learn more about Buffalo substance abuse counselors education requirements. If Arizona is your target, be sure to read about Chandler substance abuse counselors education requirements. Understanding these local requirements will help you choose the best online program and career plan tailored to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles