World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani

Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6816 6350 21 21 161 14077

Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2025. 25 of the 193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2025. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 19 publications
2005 2025

193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 1
2007 6
2008 4
2009 7
2010 10
2011 9
2012 6
2013 5
2014 12
2015 7
2016 9
2017 16
2018 12
2019 10
2020 14
2021 18
2022 8
2023 12
2024 6
2025 19
Total 193
Download as CSV

Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 161 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 161
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Fellow of the Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM)

Overview

Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani is affiliated with the University of Southern Denmark in Denmark. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a focus on subfields such as Behavioural Science, Applied Psychology, Public Health, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's work encompasses several main topics, including:

  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Motivation and Self-Concept
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors

They have contributed to multiple publication venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Aging and Physical Activity
  • Motivation Science
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • British Journal of Health Psychology

Some of the recent papers authored include:

  • A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health (2020) published in Health Psychology Review
  • A classification system for teachers' motivational behaviors recommended in self-determination theory interventions (2023) published in Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Association of wearable device-measured vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity with mortality (2022) published in Nature Medicine
  • Untapping the Health Enhancing Potential of Vigorous Intermittent Lifestyle Physical Activity (VILPA): Rationale, Scoping Review, and a 4-Pillar Research Framework (2020) published in Sports Medicine
  • Barriers and enablers of vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity (VILPA) in physically inactive adults: a focus group study (2023) published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

The scientist has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Nikos Ntoumanis
  • Eleanor Quested
  • Daniel F. Gucciardi
  • Emmanuel Stamatakis
  • Matthew Ahmadi

Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani has also contributed to academic books, including authorship of "Essentials of exercise and sport psychology: An open access textbook" (2021), published by the Society for Transparency, Openness, and Replication in Kinesiology eBooks.

Best Publications

  • Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis.

    Johan Y. Y. Ng;Nikos Ntoumanis;Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani;Edward L. Deci

  • Self-Determination Theory and Diminished Functioning The Role of Interpersonal Control and Psychological Need Thwarting

    Kimberley J. Bartholomew;Nikos Ntoumanis;Richard M. Ryan;Jos A. Bosch

  • Psychological Need Thwarting in the Sport Context: Assessing the Darker Side of Athletic Experience

    Kimberley J. Bartholomew;Nikos Ntoumanis;Richard M. Ryan;Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani

  • The Controlling Interpersonal Style in a Coaching Context: Development and Initial Validation of a Psychometric Scale

    Kimberley Bartholomew;Nikolaos Ntoumanis;Cecilie Thogersen-Ntoumani

  • The role of self-determined motivation in the understanding of exercise-related behaviours, cognitions and physical self-evaluations

    Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani;Nikos Ntoumanis

  • A review of controlling motivational strategies from a self-determination theory perspective: implications for sports coaches

    Kimberley J. Bartholomew;Nikos Ntoumanis;Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani

  • Body image, physical activity, and sport: A scoping review

    C. Sabiston;E. Pila;E. Pila;E. Pila;M. Vani;Cecilie Thogersen-Ntoumani

  • Beware of your teaching style: A school-year long investigation of controlling teaching and student motivational experiences

    Kimberley J. Bartholomew;Nikos Ntoumanis;Athanasios Mouratidis;Ermioni Katartzi

  • Method effects: the problem with negatively versus positively keyed items.

    Magnus Lindwall;Vassilis Barkoukis;Caterina Grano;Fabio Lucidi

  • Motivating the unmotivated: how can health behavior be changed in those unwilling to change?

    Sarah J. Hardcastle;Jennie Hancox;Anne Hattar;Chloe Maxwell-Smith

  • A Longitudinal Examination of Coach and Peer Motivational Climates in Youth Sport: Implications for Moral Attitudes, Well-Being, and Behavioral Investment

    Nikolaos Ntoumanis;IM Taylor;Cecilie Thogersen-Ntoumani

  • A Self-determination Theory approach to the study of body image concerns, self-presentation and self-perceptions in a sample of aerobic instructors.

    Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani;Nikos Ntoumanis

  • Conceptualizing and testing a new tripartite measure of coach interpersonal behaviors

    Nikita Bhavsar;Nikolaos Ntoumanis;Eleanor Quested;Daniel F. Gucciardi

  • Developmental Trajectories of Motivation in Physical Education: Course, Demographic Differences and Antecedents

    Nikos Ntoumanis;Vassilis Barkoukis;Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani

  • Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training in a Gym Setting Improves Cardio-Metabolic and Psychological Health

    Sam O. Shepherd;Oliver J. Wilson;Alexandra S. Taylor;Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani

  • The emergence of team resilience: A multilevel conceptual model of facilitating factors

    Daniel F. Gucciardi;Monique Crane;Nikos Ntoumanis;Sharon K. Parker

  • Unhealthy weight control behaviours in adolescent girls: A process model based on self-determination theory

    Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani;Nikos Ntoumanis;Nikitas Nikitaras

  • Dyadic interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour: systematic review and meta-analysis

    R. Carr;A. Prestwich;Dominika Kwasnicka;Cecilie Thogersen-Ntoumani

  • Stirring the motivational soup: within-person latent profiles of motivation in exercise

    Magnus Lindwall;Andreas Ivarsson;Karin Weman-Josefsson;Linus Jonsson

  • Physical Activity Adoption to Adherence, Lapse, and Dropout A Self-Determination Theory Perspective

    Florence-Emilie Kinnafick;Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani;Joan L. Duda

Frequent Co-Authors

Nikos Ntoumanis
Nikos Ntoumanis University of Southern Denmark
Daniel F. Gucciardi
Daniel F. Gucciardi Curtin University
Joan L. Duda
Joan L. Duda University of Birmingham
Andreas Stenling
Andreas Stenling Umeå University
Martin S. Hagger
Martin S. Hagger University of California, Merced
Richard M. Ryan
Richard M. Ryan Australian Catholic University
Vassilis Barkoukis
Vassilis Barkoukis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Kenneth R Fox
Kenneth R Fox University of Bristol
Kate Hunt
Kate Hunt University of Stirling

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers. One of the fastest-growing fields is Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), where Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs) play a vital role in helping individuals with behavioral challenges. In order to become a BCBA, students must meet specific educational and certification standards that can vary by state and city.

For example, those exploring Spokane bcba requirements will find unique guidelines for coursework, fieldwork, and examination. Similarly, understanding the bcba certification requirements in St. Louis is essential for students planning to practice in Missouri. If you are considering a career as a BCBA in Florida, you should review what is involved in becoming a bcba in St. Petersburg. Additionally, knowing the Stockton bcba education requirements can help guide your academic planning if you aim to work in California.

Online psychology programs make it easier to meet these requirements, offering flexible options for study and supervised experience. Beyond ABA, a psychology degree can also lead to careers in counseling, human resources, social work, and research, allowing graduates to make a broad impact in their communities.

Best Scientists Citing Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles