World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4027 3717 240 228 106 12769

Linda Snell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda Snell between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda Snell published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2017. 13 of the 131 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2017. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 4 publications
1988 2025

131 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda Snell: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 3
1995 0
1996 1
1997 5
1998 1
1999 2
2000 4
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 2
2008 4
2009 5
2010 7
2011 6
2012 1
2013 3
2014 10
2015 3
2016 5
2017 16
2018 6
2019 4
2020 3
2021 6
2022 7
2023 3
2024 9
2025 4
Total 131
Download as CSV

Linda Snell publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Snell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 104–113 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406 106
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda Snell D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Snell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda Snell is affiliated with McGill University in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly focusing on medical education and competency frameworks. Their work spans multiple subfields, including public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, family practice, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and psychiatry and mental health.

Snell's research addresses several key topics related to medical education and clinical practice. These include innovations in medical education, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, radiology practices and education, empathy and medical education, primary care and health outcomes, interprofessional education and collaboration, and medical education and admissions.

Their frequent publication venues show a strong focus on education in the medical profession, including the Canadian Medical Education Journal, Perspectives on Medical Education, Medical Teacher, BMC Medical Education, and the Journal of Surgical Education.

Several recent papers highlight the thematic focus of Snell's work:

  • "Emerging concepts in the CanMEDS physician competency framework" (2022, Canadian Medical Education Journal)
  • "Competence By Design: a transformational national model of time-variable competency-based postgraduate medical education" (2024, Perspectives on Medical Education)
  • "The future of the CanMEDS physician competency framework" (2023, Canadian Medical Education Journal)
  • "Questioning medical competence: Should the Covid-19 crisis affect the goals of medical education?" (2021, Medical Teacher)
  • "Being, becoming, and belonging: reconceptualizing professional identity formation in medicine" (2024, Frontiers in Medicine)

Frequent collaborators include Jason R. Frank, Brent Thoma, Adelle Atkinson, Anna Oswald, and Saleem Razack, indicating productive and recurring research partnerships within the medical education community.

Best Publications

  • Competency-based medical education: theory to practice.

    Jason R. Frank;Linda S. Snell;Olle Ten Cate;Eric S. Holmboe

  • Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation.

    Richard L. Cruess;Sylvia R. Cruess;J. Donald Boudreau;Linda Snell

  • A Schematic Representation of the Professional Identity Formation and Socialization of Medical Students and Residents: A Guide for Medical Educators

    Richard L. Cruess;Sylvia R. Cruess;J. Donald Boudreau;Linda Snell

  • Entrustment Decision Making in Clinical Training.

    Olle ten Cate;Danielle Hart;Felix Ankel;Jamiu Busari

  • Medical competence: The interplay between individual ability and the health care environment

    Olle Ten Cate;Linda Snell;Carol Carraccio

  • Why medical students should learn how to teach

    M. Dandavino;Linda Snell;Jeffrey Wiseman

  • Advancing Competency-Based Medical Education: A Charter for Clinician-Educators.

    Carol Carraccio;Robert Englander;Elaine Van Melle;Elaine Van Melle;Olle Ten Cate

  • Interactive lecturing: strategies for increasing participation in large group presentations

    Yvonne Steinert;Linda S. Snell

  • Faculty development for teaching and evaluating professionalism: from programme design to curriculum change

    Yvonne Steinert;Sylvia Cruess;Richard Cruess;Linda Snell

  • Orienting Teaching Toward the Learning Process

    Olle ten Cate;Linda Snell;Karen Mann;Jan Vermunt

  • Competency-based medical education: implications for undergraduate programs

    Peter Harris;Linda Snell;Martin Talbot;Ronald M. Harden

  • Unnecessary Prescribing of NSAIDs and the Management of NSAID-Related Gastropathy in Medical Practice

    R Tamblyn;L Berkson;W D Dauphinee;D Gayton

  • A call to action: The controversy of and rationale for competency-based medical education

    Eric S Holmboe;Jonathan Sherbino;Robert Englander;Linda Snell

  • A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: new perspectives and challenges

    Linda Snell;Susan Tallett;Steven Haist;Richard Hays

  • The clinical learning environment

    Jonas Nordquist;Jena Hall;Kelly Caverzagie;Linda Snell;Linda Snell

  • Strategic planning in medical education: enhancing the learning environment for students in clinical settings

    Jill Gordon;Clarke Hazlett;Olle Ten Cate;Karen Mann

  • Toward a shared language for competency-based medical education.

    Robert Englander;Jason R. Frank;Carol Carraccio;Jonathan Sherbino

  • Implementing competency-based medical education: Moving forward.

    Jason R. Frank;Linda Snell;Robert Englander;Eric S. Holmboe

  • Variations in lecturing styles

    Alenoush Saroyan;Linda S. Snell

  • Defining the Key Roles and Competencies of the Clinician-Educator of the 21st Century: A National Mixed-Methods Study

    Jonathan Sherbino;Jason R. Frank;Linda Snell

  • Instructional Design: Applying Theory to Teaching Practice

    Linda Snell;Daisuke Son;Hirotaka Onishi

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason R. Frank
Jason R. Frank Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Yvonne Steinert
Yvonne Steinert McGill University
Jonathan Sherbino
Jonathan Sherbino McMaster University
Olle ten Cate
Olle ten Cate Utrecht University
Richard L. Cruess
Richard L. Cruess McGill University
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania
Michal Abrahamowicz
Michal Abrahamowicz McGill University
Karen Mann
Karen Mann Dalhousie University
Jocelyn Lockyer
Jocelyn Lockyer University of Calgary
Ronald M. Harden
Ronald M. Harden University of Dundee

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your career in Social Sciences and Humanities no longer requires traditional, on-campus study. Today, a variety of fully online degree programs make it possible to pursue your passion from anywhere. For those interested in human behavior and mental health, pursuing an online degree in psychology is a flexible and cost-effective way to build foundational knowledge and prepare for further qualifications.

If your goal is to work directly with individuals or communities, you might consider the easiest msw programs to get into for a Master of Social Work. These programs can lead to roles in counseling, social policy, or clinical practice. For those passionate about becoming clinical psychologists, pursuing a doctorate through a psyd online program is a practical route, offering clinical training and research opportunities.

Another in-demand specialty is marriage and family therapy. You can qualify for this dynamic field in less time by choosing from the shortest online mft programs. Overall, the growth of online degrees means more career pathways in the social sciences and humanities are within your reach, regardless of your location or schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Snell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles