World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Deng-Feng Li

Deng-Feng Li

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 53 4871 4736 652 648 155 10151

Deng-Feng Li publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Deng-Feng Li between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Deng-Feng Li published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2016. 19 of the 200 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2016. 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 10 publications
2004 2025

200 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Deng-Feng Li: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 3
2005 3
2006 1
2007 4
2008 4
2009 5
2010 13
2011 6
2012 4
2013 10
2014 21
2015 6
2016 24
2017 9
2018 14
2019 13
2020 13
2021 10
2022 10
2023 8
2024 9
2025 10
Total 200
Download as CSV

Deng-Feng Li publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deng-Feng Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 152–161 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 155 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559 155
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Deng-Feng Li D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deng-Feng Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518 53
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Deng-Feng Li is affiliated with Fuzhou University in China and has an extensive research profile primarily within the field of Engineering. Their work intersects several specialized subfields, including Management Science and Operations Research, Control and Systems Engineering, Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's research focuses on diverse topics such as Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Optimization and Mathematical Programming, Supply Chain and Inventory Management, Game Theory and Voting Systems, Sustainable Supply Chain Management, and Auction Theory and Applications.

Frequent publication venues for Deng-Feng Li include Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Education and Awareness of Sustainability, Soft Computing, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, and Group Decision and Negotiation.

The scientist has contributed to several research papers spanning from 2020 to 2021. Notable recent publications include:

  • "A novel cooperative game-based method to coordinate a sustainable supply chain under psychological uncertainty in fairness concerns" (2021) in Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review
  • "Willingness-to-cede behaviour in sustainable supply chain coordination" (2021) in International Journal of Production Economics
  • "Leveraging metal oxide nanoparticles for bacteria tracing and eradicating" (2020) in View
  • "An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Objective Goal Programming Approach to Portfolio Selection" (2021) in International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
  • "Electronic health records based reinforcement learning for treatment optimizing" (2021) in Information Systems

Deng-Feng Li collaborates frequently with co-authors such as Gao-Feng Yu, Zhi Liu, Xiao-Xue Zheng, Tianhao Li, and Jia-Cai Liu, indicating active engagement in research networks.

Best Publications

  • Multiattribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    Unknown

  • Corrections to “TOPSIS-Based Nonlinear-Programming Methodology for Multi-attribute Decision Making With Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets”

    Jia-Cai Liu;Deng-Feng Li

  • A ratio ranking method of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and its application to MADM problems

    Deng-Feng Li

  • Closeness coefficient based nonlinear programming method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiattribute decision making with incomplete preference information

    Unknown

  • Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making

    Younes Ataei;Amin Mahmoudi;Mohammad Reza Feylizadeh;Deng-Feng Li

  • Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees

    Shu-Ping Wan;Deng-Feng Li

  • Linear programming method for multiattribute group decision making using IF sets

    Deng-Feng Li;Guo-Hong Chen;Zhi-Gang Huang

  • Linear programming method for MADM with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    Deng-Feng Li

  • Extension of the LINMAP for multiattribute decision making under Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy environment

    Deng-Feng Li

  • Multiattribute decision making method based on generalized OWA operators with intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    Deng-Feng Li

  • Atanassov's Intuitionistic Fuzzy Programming Method for Heterogeneous Multiattribute Group Decision Making With Atanassov's Intuitionistic Fuzzy Truth Degrees

    Shu-Ping Wan;Deng-Feng Li

  • Fractional programming methodology for multi-attribute group decision-making using IFS

    Unknown

  • Compromise ratio method for fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making

    Unknown

  • Mathematical-Programming Approach to Matrix Games With Payoffs Represented by Atanassov's Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

    Deng-Feng Li

  • Decision and Game Theory in Management With Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

    Deng-Feng Li

  • Fuzzy linear programming technique for multiattribute group decision making in fuzzy environments

    Deng-Feng Li;Jian-Bo Yang

  • A Ranking Method of Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers and Application to Decision Making

    Deng Feng Li;Jiang Xia Nan;Mao Jun Zhang

  • Fuzzy mathematical programming approach to heterogeneous multiattribute decision-making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees

    Shu-Ping Wan;Deng-Feng Li

  • The GOWA operator based approach to multiattribute decision making using intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    Unknown

  • A Compromise-Typed Variable Weight Decision Method for Hybrid Multiattribute Decision Making

    Gao-Feng Yu;Wei Fei;Deng-Feng Li

  • A Lexicographic Method for Matrix Games with Payoffs of Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers

    Jiang-Xia Nan;Deng-Feng Li;Mao-Jun Zhang

  • A novel cooperative game-based method to coordinate a sustainable supply chain under psychological uncertainty in fairness concerns

    Zhi Liu;Xiao-Xue Zheng;Deng-Feng Li;Chen-Nan Liao

  • A novel method for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making with preference deviation

    Gao-Feng Yu;Deng-Feng Li;Wei Fei

  • Fuzzy heterogeneous multiattribute decision making method for outsourcing provider selection

    Deng-Feng Li;Shu-Ping Wan

  • A systematic approach to heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making

    Deng-Feng Li;Zhi-Gang Huang;Guo-Hong Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Dejian Yu
Dejian Yu Nanjing Audit University
Shu-Ping Wan
Shu-Ping Wan Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics
José M. Merigó
José M. Merigó University of Technology Sydney
Sankar Kumar Roy
Sankar Kumar Roy Vidyasagar University
Jian-Bo Yang
Jian-Bo Yang University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and career options. For students interested in environmental solutions, an environmental engineering degree offers the chance to address sustainability challenges using advanced technology.

Engineering-heavy roles like robotics or hardware design often require foundational knowledge. Those seeking affordability can consider reviewing mechanical engineering degree cost for flexible online study options.

Interested in the scientific principles behind technology? Today, can you get a physics degree online is a question with more "yes" answers than ever, making this core science accessible from home.

For those focused on big data and analytics, a data science graduate program is a top choice. Many students research the cheapest data science masters in usa to find the best balance between quality and affordability.

Each of these online degrees complements computer science and helps you tailor your career path according to your interests, goals, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Deng-Feng Li

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles