World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 39 549 499 4 4 139 5572

Markus Wagner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Markus Wagner between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Markus Wagner published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2019. 19 of the 167 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2019. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 8 publications
1991 2025

167 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Markus Wagner: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 2
2009 2
2010 0
2011 3
2012 9
2013 3
2014 13
2015 6
2016 9
2017 7
2018 4
2019 34
2020 14
2021 16
2022 4
2023 19
2024 11
2025 8
Total 167
Download as CSV

Markus Wagner publications per year - data summary

  • Markus Wagner, a Political Science scholar from University of Vienna, has 167 publications recorded across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1991 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 34 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1991, 1992 and 2007, with 1 publication each.
  • 15 of the 35 years in the span carry no publications at all (1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.3 per year counting only the 20 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 58 publications, 35% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1991-2002: 2 publications (0.2 per year); 2003-2014: 33 publications (2.8 per year); 2015-2025: 132 publications (12.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Markus Wagner publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Wagner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 136–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 139 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45 139
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Markus Wagner publication distribution in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 36–40 to 333+ publications.
  • Markus Wagner, a Political Science scholar from University of Vienna, records 139 publications - the 60th percentile of the discipline.
  • 60% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Markus Wagner, and about 40% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 121–125 publications range, and Markus Wagner ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 333+ publications, holding 97 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 44% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 111–115 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 333 publications or more, 97 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Markus Wagner D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Wagner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40 39
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Markus Wagner D-index placement in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 43 ranges running from 20 to 62+ D-Index.
  • Markus Wagner, a Political Science scholar from University of Vienna, records 39 D-Index - the 75th percentile of the discipline.
  • 75% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Markus Wagner, and about 25% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 32 D-Index range, and Markus Wagner ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62+ D-Index, holding 100 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 45% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 30 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Overview

Markus Wagner is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria and specializes in the social sciences with a focus on political science and related interdisciplinary fields. Their research spans several subfields, including political science and international relations, sociology and political science, communication, economics and econometrics, and strategy and management.

The main topics addressed in their work include electoral systems and political participation, populism and right-wing movements, social media and politics, social policy and reform studies, social and intergroup psychology, fiscal policies and political economy, and political influence and corporate strategies.

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Wagner are:

  • Affective polarization in multiparty systems, 2020, Electoral Studies
  • Electoral fortunes of social democratic parties: do second dimension positions matter?, 2020, Journal of European Public Policy
  • Voter Responses to Fiscal Austerity, 2020, British Journal of Political Science
  • The centre-right versus the radical right: the role of migration issues and economic grievances, 2021, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
  • Does affective polarisation increase turnout? Evidence from Germany, The Netherlands and Spain, 2022, West European Politics

Frequent coauthors with whom Wagner has collaborated multiple times include Thomas Sattler, Konstantin Glinitzer, Sylvia Kritzinger, Tarik Abou-Chadi, and Evelyne Hübscher.

Wagner's work appears regularly in specific publication venues. These include Harvard Dataverse, AUSSDA - The Austrian Social Science Data Archive, SSRN Electronic Journal, British Journal of Political Science, and The Journal of Politics. The diverse range of outlets indicates a broad engagement with various segments of the political science and social science research communities.

Best Publications

  • Defining and measuring niche parties

    Markus Wagner

  • Which Issues do Parties Emphasise? Salience Strategies and Party Organisation in Multiparty Systems

    Markus Wagner;Thomas M. Meyer

  • Left-Authoritarians and Policy Representation in Western Europe: Electoral Choice across Ideological Dimensions

    Zoe Lefkofridi;Markus Wagner;Johanna E. Willmann

  • When do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy differentiation influence issue importance

    Markus Wagner

  • Mainstream or Niche? Vote-Seeking Incentives and the Programmatic Strategies of Political Parties:

    Thomas M. Meyer;Markus Wagner

  • One Bias Fits All? Three Types of Media Bias and Their Effects on Party Preferences

    Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Hajo G. Boomgaarden;Markus Wagner

  • Voting at 16: Turnout and the quality of vote choice

    Markus Wagner;David Johann;Sylvia Kritzinger

  • The Radical Right as Niche Parties? The Ideological Landscape of Party Systems in Western Europe, 1980–2014:

    Markus Wagner;Thomas M Meyer

  • How has Radical Right Support Transformed Established Political Conflicts? The Case of Austria

    Julian Aichholzer;Sylvia Kritzinger;Markus Wagner;Eva Zeglovits

  • Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament

    Daniel Bischof;Markus Wagner

  • Partisan Bias in Message Selection: Media Gatekeeping of Party Press Releases.

    Martin Haselmayer;Markus Wagner;Thomas M. Meyer

  • Corruption, accountability, and gender : do female politicians face higher standards in public life?

    Andrew C. Eggers;Nick Vivyan;Markus Wagner

  • Representative misconduct, voter perceptions and accountability: evidence from the 2009 House of Commons expenses scandal

    Nick Vivyan;Markus Wagner;Jessica Tarlov

  • Fear and Anger in Great Britain: Blame Assignment and Emotional Reactions to the Financial Crisis

    Markus Wagner

  • Fear, anger and enthusiasm about the European Union: Effects of emotional reactions on public preferences towards European integration:

    Sofia Vasilopoulou;Markus Wagner

  • The Electoral Appeal of Party Strategies in Postindustrial Societies: When Can the Mainstream Left Succeed?

    Tarik Abou-Chadi;Markus Wagner

  • Electoral fortunes of social democratic parties: do second dimension positions matter?

    Tarik Abou-Chadi;Markus Wagner

  • Legislator dissent as a valence signal

    Rosie Campbell;Philip Cowley;Nick Vivyan;Markus Wagner

  • Voter Responses to Fiscal Austerity

    Evelyne Hübscher;Thomas Sattler;Markus Wagner

  • Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics

    Markus Wagner

Frequent Co-Authors

Sylvia Kritzinger
Sylvia Kritzinger University of Vienna
Hajo G. Boomgaarden
Hajo G. Boomgaarden University of Vienna
Wolfgang C. Müller
Wolfgang C. Müller University of Vienna
Andrew C. Eggers
Andrew C. Eggers University of Chicago
Philip Cowley
Philip Cowley Queen Mary University of London
Rosie Campbell
Rosie Campbell King's College London
Silja Häusermann
Silja Häusermann University of Zurich
Herbert Kitschelt
Herbert Kitschelt Duke University
Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik
Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik University of Vienna
Sara B. Hobolt
Sara B. Hobolt London School of Economics and Political Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary fields and dynamic career trajectories. Many students combine their study with other subjects to deepen their knowledge and enhance employment prospects.

For example, enrolling in an online math degree can strengthen your quantitative skills—essential for careers in policy analysis, statistics, and economics. Those interested in information management or government archives may consider the best library science programs online, which offer specialized training in digital literacy and research methodology.

A passion for past events and societal change often leads Political Science graduates to pursue degrees for history, preparing them for roles in education, public service, or historical research. Alternatively, if you’re seeking flexibility, an interdisciplinary studies course allows you to tailor your academic journey, combining Political Science with fields like sociology, philosophy, or communications.

These online degrees expand your skill set and career options, whether you aim for roles in government, education, data analysis, or beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Wagner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles