D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Law and Political Science D-index 23 Citations 2,243 63 World Ranking 1029 National Ranking 5

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Politics
  • Law
  • Social psychology

His primary areas of study are Salience, Politics, Public relations, Political economy and Manifesto. His Salience study results in a more complete grasp of Social psychology. His research in the fields of Comparative politics overlaps with other disciplines such as Internet privacy and Convergent validity.

His research on Public relations frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Party competition. As part of one scientific family, Markus Wagner deals mainly with the area of Political economy, narrowing it down to issues related to the Ideology, and often Economic system and Authoritarianism. His study brings together the fields of Mainstream and Manifesto.

His most cited work include:

  • Defining and measuring niche parties (142 citations)
  • Which Issues do Parties Emphasise? Salience Strategies and Party Organisation in Multiparty Systems (102 citations)
  • When do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy differentiation influence issue importance (92 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Politics, Political economy, Social psychology, Public relations and Ideology. His Voting study, which is part of a larger body of work in Politics, is frequently linked to Perception, Identification and Incentive, bridging the gap between disciplines. His study on Political economy also encompasses disciplines like

  • Mainstream together with Social democracy,
  • Legislature and Public administration most often made with reference to Parliament,
  • Manifesto together with Salience.

His research integrates issues of Referendum and Misconduct in his study of Social psychology. His studies deal with areas such as Gatekeeping and Opposition as well as Public relations. The concepts of his Ideology study are interwoven with issues in Economic system and Decentralization.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Politics (42.27%)
  • Political economy (26.80%)
  • Social psychology (20.62%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Politics (42.27%)
  • Political economy (26.80%)
  • Social psychology (20.62%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Politics, Political economy, Social psychology, Perception and Democracy. His Politics research incorporates elements of Positive economics and Media consumption. His studies in Positive economics integrate themes in fields like Representation and Social mobility.

The Political economy study combines topics in areas such as Radical right, Voting, Mainstream, Parliament and Populism. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Dissent, Legislature, Division of labour and Dissenting opinion. His study in the field of Enthusiasm, Hostility and Ingroups and outgroups also crosses realms of Backlash and Contact theory.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Electoral fortunes of social democratic parties: do second dimension positions matter? (16 citations)
  • Affective polarization in multiparty systems (8 citations)
  • Perceptions of parties’ left-right positions: The impact of salience strategies (7 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Politics
  • Law
  • Social psychology

Political economy, Dimension, Social psychology, Perception and Politics are his primary areas of study. His Political economy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Radical right, Party competition and Social democracy. Dimension combines with fields such as Know-how, Meaning, Salience, Immigration and Mainstream in his investigation.

His work carried out in the field of Social psychology brings together such families of science as Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, Democracy and Polarization. His Politics study incorporates themes from Positive economics and Social class.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Defining and measuring niche parties

Markus Wagner.
Party Politics (2012)

309 Citations

Which Issues do Parties Emphasise? Salience Strategies and Party Organisation in Multiparty Systems

Markus Wagner;Thomas M. Meyer.
West European Politics (2014)

203 Citations

When do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy differentiation influence issue importance

Markus Wagner.
European Journal of Political Research (2012)

169 Citations

Voting at 16: Turnout and the quality of vote choice

Markus Wagner;David Johann;Sylvia Kritzinger.
Electoral Studies (2012)

143 Citations

The Radical Right as Niche Parties? The Ideological Landscape of Party Systems in Western Europe, 1980–2014:

Markus Wagner;Thomas M Meyer.
Political Studies (2017)

135 Citations

Left-Authoritarians and Policy Representation in Western Europe: Electoral Choice across Ideological Dimensions

Zoe Lefkofridi;Markus Wagner;Johanna E. Willmann.
West European Politics (2014)

134 Citations

Mainstream or Niche? Vote-Seeking Incentives and the Programmatic Strategies of Political Parties:

Thomas M. Meyer;Markus Wagner.
Comparative Political Studies (2013)

123 Citations

How has Radical Right Support Transformed Established Political Conflicts? The Case of Austria

Julian Aichholzer;Sylvia Kritzinger;Markus Wagner;Eva Zeglovits.
West European Politics (2014)

103 Citations

One Bias Fits All? Three Types of Media Bias and Their Effects on Party Preferences

Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Hajo G. Boomgaarden;Markus Wagner.
Communication Research (2017)

101 Citations

Representative misconduct, voter perceptions and accountability: evidence from the 2009 House of Commons expenses scandal

Nick Vivyan;Markus Wagner;Jessica Tarlov.
Electoral Studies (2012)

85 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Markus Wagner

Hajo G. Boomgaarden

Hajo G. Boomgaarden

University of Vienna

Publications: 10

Catherine E. De Vries

Catherine E. De Vries

Bocconi University

Publications: 7

Mark N. Franklin

Mark N. Franklin

European University Institute

Publications: 5

Niklas Potrafke

Niklas Potrafke

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Publications: 4

George E. Marcus

George E. Marcus

Williams College

Publications: 4

Jörg Matthes

Jörg Matthes

University of Vienna

Publications: 4

Wolfgang C. Müller

Wolfgang C. Müller

University of Vienna

Publications: 4

Geoffrey M. Evans

Geoffrey M. Evans

University of Newcastle Australia

Publications: 3

Homero Gil de Zúñiga

Homero Gil de Zúñiga

University of Salamanca

Publications: 3

Simon Hix

Simon Hix

London School of Economics and Political Science

Publications: 3

Hanspeter Kriesi

Hanspeter Kriesi

European University Institute

Publications: 3

Garry D. Bruton

Garry D. Bruton

Texas Christian University

Publications: 3

David Martens

David Martens

University of Antwerp

Publications: 2

Trending Scientists

Xunpeng Shi

Xunpeng Shi

University of Technology Sydney

Martin P. Bendsøe

Martin P. Bendsøe

Technical University of Denmark

Osamu Sato

Osamu Sato

Kyushu University

Pauline M. Harrison

Pauline M. Harrison

University of Sheffield

Mei-Yin Chou

Mei-Yin Chou

Academia Sinica

P. Andrew Karplus

P. Andrew Karplus

Oregon State University

Michael E. Grigg

Michael E. Grigg

National Institutes of Health

Barry G. Rolfe

Barry G. Rolfe

Australian National University

Rejko Krüger

Rejko Krüger

University of Luxembourg

Bernhard Brüne

Bernhard Brüne

Goethe University Frankfurt

Rucheng Wang

Rucheng Wang

Nanjing University

Oliver Pogarell

Oliver Pogarell

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Yasumasa Okamoto

Yasumasa Okamoto

Hiroshima University

Stan Maes

Stan Maes

Leiden University

Martin F. Shapiro

Martin F. Shapiro

Cornell University

Amihai Glazer

Amihai Glazer

University of California, Irvine

Something went wrong. Please try again later.