World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
22
Citations
2559
World Ranking
1836
National Ranking
926

Andrew C. Eggers publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C. Eggers sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 17 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 60 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Andrew C. Eggers D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C. Eggers sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 73 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 22 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew C. Eggers is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a primary focus on social sciences and economics, econometrics, and finance. Their academic contributions extend into related subfields including economics and econometrics, political science and international relations, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, and statistics and probability.

Eggers' scholarship concentrates on several key topics. These include electoral systems and political participation, game theory and voting systems, Benford's law and fraud detection, social policy and reform studies, gender politics and representation, economic policies and impacts, and climate change communication and perception.

The scientist has published extensively across various academic venues. Among the frequent publication platforms are Harvard Dataverse, The Journal of Politics, American Journal of Political Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and CrimRxiv.

Several papers demonstrate the range of research interests and depth pursued by Eggers. Notable recent works include:

  • Placebo Tests for Causal Inference (2023), published in American Journal of Political Science
  • No evidence for systematic voter fraud: A guide to statistical claims about the 2020 election (2021), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Who Votes More Strategically? (2020), American Political Science Review
  • No evidence for systematic voter fraud: A guide to statistical claims about the 2020 election (2021), CrimRxiv
  • Susceptibility to Strategic Voting: A Comparison of Plurality and Instant-Runoff Elections (2023), The Journal of Politics

Eggers has collaborated with several co-authors on multiple occasions. Frequent collaborators include Guadalupe Tuñón, Allan Dafoe, Haritz Garro, Justin Grimmer, and Leonardo Carella.

Best Publications

  • On the validity of the regression discontinuity design for estimating electoral effects: : new evidence from over 40,000 close races

    Andrew C. Eggers;Anthony Fowler;Jens Hainmueller;Andrew B. Hall

  • MPs for Sale? Returns to Office in Postwar British Politics

    Andrew C. Eggers;Jens Hainmueller

  • Regression Discontinuity Designs Based on Population Thresholds: Pitfalls and Solutions

    Andrew C. Eggers;Ronny Freier;Veronica Grembi;Tommaso Nannicini

  • Well-being and unemployment in Russia in the 1990s: Can society's suffering be individuals’ solace?

    Andrew Eggers;Clifford Gaddy;Carol Graham;Carol Graham

  • Partisanship and Electoral Accountability: Evidence from the UK Expenses Scandal

    Andrew C. Eggers

  • Corruption, accountability, and gender : do female politicians face higher standards in public life?

    Andrew C. Eggers;Nick Vivyan;Markus Wagner

  • Proportionality and Turnout: Evidence From French Municipalities

    Andrew C. Eggers

  • Capitol Losses: The Mediocre Performance of Congressional Stock Portfolios

    Andrew C. Eggers;Jens Hainmueller

  • No evidence for systematic voter fraud: A guide to statistical claims about the 2020 election.

    Andrew C. Eggers;Haritz Garro;Justin Grimmer

  • Ministerial Responsiveness in Westminster Systems: Institutional Choices and House of Commons Debate, 1832–1915

    Andrew C. Eggers;Arthur Spirling

  • Electoral Accountability and the UK Parliamentary Expenses Scandal: Did Voters Punish Corrupt MPs?

    Andrew C. Eggers;Alexander C. Fisher

  • Party Cohesion in Westminster Systems: Inducements, Replacement and Discipline in the House of Commons, 1836–1910

    Andrew C. Eggers;Arthur Spirling

  • Incumbency Effects and the Strength of Party Preferences: Evidence from Multiparty Elections in the United Kingdom

    Andrew C. Eggers;Arthur Spirling

  • Electoral Security as a Determinant of Legislator Activity, 1832–1918: New Data and Methods for Analyzing British Political Development

    Andrew C. Eggers;Arthur Spirling

  • Who Votes More Strategically

    Andrew C. Eggers;Nick Vivyan

  • Political capital: corporate connections and stock investments in the U.S. congress, 2004-2008

    Andrew C. Eggers;Jens Hainmueller

  • The role of output composition in the stabilization of US output growth

    Andrew Eggers;Yannis M. Ioannides

  • On the Validity of the Regression Discontinuity Design for Estimating Electoral Effects: New Evidence from over 40,000 Close Races

    Andrew C. Eggers;Anthony Fowler;Jens Hainmueller;Andrew B. Hall

  • Quality-Based Explanations of Incumbency Effects

    Andrew C. Eggers

  • Guarding the Guardians: Legislative Self-Policing and Electoral Corruption in Victorian Britain ∗

    Andrew C. Eggers;Arthur Spirling

  • The Shadow Cabinet in Westminster Systems: Modeling Opposition Agenda Setting in the House of Commons, 1832–1915

    Andrew C. Eggers;Arthur Spirling

  • Rallying in fear? Estimating the effect of the UK COVID-19 lockdown with a natural experiment

    Andrew C. Eggers;Robin Harding

  • Representation and district magnitude in plurality systems

    Andrew C. Eggers;Alexander B. Fouirnaies

  • The economic impact of recession announcements

    Andrew C. Eggers;Martin Ellison;Sang Seok Lee

  • Open/Closed List and Party Choice: Experimental Evidence from the U.K.

    Jack Blumenau;Andrew C. Eggers;Dominik Hangartner;Dominik Hangartner;Simon Hix

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur Spirling
Arthur Spirling Princeton University
Jens Hainmueller
Jens Hainmueller Stanford University
James M. Snyder
James M. Snyder Harvard University
Ngaire Woods
Ngaire Woods University of Oxford
Markus Wagner
Markus Wagner University of Vienna
Simon Hix
Simon Hix European University Institute
Carol Graham
Carol Graham Brookings Institution
Yannis M. Ioannides
Yannis M. Ioannides Tufts University
Peter John Loewen
Peter John Loewen Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Political Science opens the door to many flexible and affordable online education options. For students wanting to expand their knowledge base, consider exploring some of the most affordable online master's in history. These programs can complement political science studies and are offered by accredited institutions at a lower cost.

If you are considering the quickest avenue to advance or switch careers, several easy certifications to get that pay well can add valuable skills and boost your resume in fields related to policy analysis, public administration, or law.

Students looking for efficiency might want to explore some of the shortest masters programs available online, which can help you earn an advanced qualification in as little as one year.

Finally, affordability is an important consideration. To keep education costs low, you can find many options among the cheapest regionally accredited online colleges that offer political science and related online degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew C. Eggers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles