World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dominik Hangartner

Dominik Hangartner

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 34 819 740 19 19 154 8035

Dominik Hangartner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dominik Hangartner between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dominik Hangartner published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2019. 38 of the 241 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2019. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 45 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 20 publications
1983 2025

241 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dominik Hangartner: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 2
2007 3
2008 2
2009 7
2010 5
2011 11
2012 2
2013 5
2014 8
2015 7
2016 9
2017 33
2018 6
2019 45
2020 26
2021 11
2022 6
2023 13
2024 18
2025 20
Total 241
Download as CSV

Dominik Hangartner publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Hangartner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–155 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 154 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45 154
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Dominik Hangartner D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Hangartner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84 34
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Economics and Empirical Social Sciences

Overview

Dominik Hangartner is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland. Their research predominantly spans the social sciences, with a focus on sociology and political science. They have contributed extensively to several subfields, including economics and econometrics, statistics and probability, political science and international relations, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's work centers on key topics such as migration and labor dynamics, migration, refugees, and integration, as well as migration, health, and trauma. Additional areas of interest include media influence and politics, advanced causal inference techniques, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, and names, identity, and discrimination research.

Dominik Hangartner's recent papers include:

  • "Attitudes Toward Migrants in a Highly Impacted Economy: Evidence From the Syrian Refugee Crisis in Jordan," 2020, Comparative Political Studies
  • "Empathy-based counterspeech can reduce racist hate speech in a social media field experiment," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Profiling Compliers and Noncompliers for Instrumental-Variable Analysis," 2020, Political Analysis
  • "Monitoring hiring discrimination through online recruitment platforms," 2021, Nature
  • "Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Decision-Making in Conjoint Experiments," 2020, Political Analysis

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Jens Hainmueller, Elliott Ash, Sergio Galletta, Yotam Margalit, and Matteo Pinna, with collaboration counts ranging from 10 to 16 joint works per coauthor.

Dominik Hangartner has published primarily in venues such as Harvard Dataverse, AEA Randomized Controlled Trials, SSRN Electronic Journal, Political Analysis, and arXiv (Cornell University). Their contributions have appeared across 20 publications in Harvard Dataverse, 13 in AEA Randomized Controlled Trials, 8 in SSRN Electronic Journal, 5 in Political Analysis, and 3 in arXiv.

In 2021, the scientist was recognized by the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina - Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften for contributions related to economics and empirical social sciences.

Best Publications

  • Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior

    Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner;Dominik Hangartner;Teppei Yamamoto

  • How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers

    Kirk Bansak;Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner

  • How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers

    Kirk Bansak;Kirk Bansak;Jens Hainmueller;Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner;Dominik Hangartner

  • Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigrant Discrimination

    Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner

  • Social Networks and Labour Market Outcomes: The Non-Monetary Benefits of Social Capital

    Axel Franzen;Dominik Hangartner

  • Improving refugee integration through data-driven algorithmic assignment

    Kirk Bansak;Jeremy Ferwerda;Jeremy Ferwerda;Jens Hainmueller;Andrea Dillon

  • Does Exposure to the Refugee Crisis Make Natives More Hostile

    Dominik Hangartner;Elias Dinas;Moritz Marbach;Konstantinos Matakos

  • When lives are put on hold: Lengthy asylum processes decrease employment among refugees

    Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner;Duncan Lawrence

  • Waking up the Golden Dawn : does exposure to the refugee crisis increase support for extreme-right parties?

    Elias Dinas;Konstantinos Matakos;Dimitrios Xefteris;Dominik Hangartner

  • Examination of the Synthetic Control Method for Evaluating Health Policies with Multiple Treated Units

    Noémi Kreif;Richard Grieve;Dominik Hangartner;Alex James Turner

  • Catalyst or crown: does naturalization promote the long-term social integration of immigrants?

    Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner;Giuseppe Pietrantuono

  • Multidimensional measure of immigrant integration.

    Niklas Harder;Lucila Figueroa;Rachel M. Gillum;Dominik Hangartner

  • Naturalization fosters the long-term political integration of immigrants

    Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner;Dominik Hangartner;Giuseppe Pietrantuono;Giuseppe Pietrantuono

  • The long-term impact of employment bans on the economic integration of refugees.

    Moritz Marbach;Moritz Marbach;Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner

  • Empathy-based counterspeech can reduce racist hate speech in a social media field experiment

    Unknown

  • When Deliberative Theory Meets Empirical Political Science: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Political Deliberation

    André Bächtiger;Dominik Hangartner

  • Circular Data in Political Science and How to Handle It

    Jeff Gill;Dominik Hangartner

  • Does compulsory voting increase support for leftist policy

    Michael M. Bechtel;Dominik Hangartner;Lukas Schmid

  • Ethnic networks can foster the economic integration of refugees.

    Linna Martén;Linna Martén;Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner;Dominik Hangartner;Dominik Hangartner

  • Attitudes Toward Migrants in a Highly Impacted Economy: Evidence From the Syrian Refugee Crisis in Jordan:

    Ala' Alrababa'h;Ala' Alrababa'h;Andrea Balacar Dillon;Scott Williamson;Scott Williamson;Jens Hainmueller;Jens Hainmueller

  • Europeans support a proportional allocation of asylum seekers

    Kirk Bansak;Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner

  • Monitoring hiring discrimination through online recruitment platforms

    Dominik Hangartner;Dominik Hangartner;Daniel Kopp;Michael Siegenthaler

  • Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Decision-Making in Conjoint Experiments

    Libby Jenke;Kirk Bansak;Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner

  • The effect of citizenship on the long-term earnings of marginalized immigrants: Quasi-experimental evidence from Switzerland.

    Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner;Dominik Hangartner;Dalston Ward

  • Compulsory voting, habit formation, and political participation

    Michael M. Bechtel;Dominik Hangartner;Lukas Schmid

  • Comparing Candidates and Citizens in the Ideological Space

    Philippe Leimgruber;Dominik Hangartner;Lucas Leemann

Frequent Co-Authors

Jens Hainmueller
Jens Hainmueller Stanford University
Jeremy M. Weinstein
Jeremy M. Weinstein Harvard University
Elias Dinas
Elias Dinas European University Institute
Marc Helbling
Marc Helbling University of Mannheim
David D. Laitin
David D. Laitin Stanford University
Marco R. Steenbergen
Marco R. Steenbergen University of Zurich
Simon Hix
Simon Hix European University Institute
André Bächtiger
André Bächtiger University of Stuttgart
Andrew C. Eggers
Andrew C. Eggers University of Chicago
Matt Sutton
Matt Sutton University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in Political Science opens doors to a range of interdisciplinary careers and further study opportunities. Many students combine political science skills with quantitative analysis, making online math degree programs a helpful complement for those interested in policy analysis, data-driven research, or economics.

For those interested in public service, research, or the organization of information, pursuing a librarian degree online can lead to rewarding roles in public, academic, or government libraries. Likewise, studying politics is closely linked with understanding historical contexts, making history related degrees another strong option for students focused on research, teaching, or archival work.

Students seeking a broader, customizable education may consider interdisciplinary studies graduate programs. These programs allow for unique combinations of political science courses with other academic interests, helping graduates prepare for diverse career paths in education, nonprofits, business, or public administration.

Best Scientists Citing Dominik Hangartner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles