What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
European integration, Politics, Ideology, Law and Context are his primary areas of study.
Marco R. Steenbergen interconnects Persuasion, Dissent, Referendum, Capitalism and Public opinion in the investigation of issues within European integration.
His Politics research includes elements of Empirical research and Conversation.
His Ideology study which covers Public administration that intersects with Manifesto.
Marco R. Steenbergen has researched Context in several fields, including Social psychology, Political economy and Demon.
His research in Political economy intersects with topics in Elitism, Elite, Political corruption, Corruption and Salience.
His most cited work include:
- Modeling Multilevel Data Structures (1152 citations)
- Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999-2010 (558 citations)
- The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation (528 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Politics, Social psychology, Political economy, European integration and Public administration.
His Politics study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Context and Positive economics.
His work in the fields of Social psychology, such as Ambivalence, intersects with other areas such as Survey data collection.
His research investigates the connection with Political economy and areas like Public opinion which intersect with concerns in Publics.
His European integration research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Multi-level governance, Elite and Public relations.
His Public administration research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Egalitarianism, Social Welfare, Manifesto and Welfare.
He most often published in these fields:
- Politics (37.50%)
- Social psychology (22.22%)
- Political economy (22.22%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?
- Politics (37.50%)
- Political economy (22.22%)
- Ideology (11.11%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Politics, Political economy, Ideology, Chapel and Populism.
His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Positive economics and Politics.
His Political economy study incorporates themes from Context and Brexit.
Ideology is a subfield of Law that Marco R. Steenbergen tackles.
His Populism study combines topics in areas such as Common ground, Social science, Content analysis and Public opinion.
His studies deal with areas such as Manifesto and Public administration as well as European integration.
Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999-2010 (558 citations)
- Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data (313 citations)
- The appeal of populist ideas, strategies and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication (22 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Ideology, Law, Politics, Chapel and Metadata.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Public opinion and Corruption in addition to Ideology.
The concepts of his Public opinion study are interwoven with issues in Common ground, News media, Political communication and Social science, Content analysis.
His Content analysis study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as Populism.
His Corruption research integrates issues from Context, Elitism, Salience and Political economy.
His Chapel investigation overlaps with other areas such as Manifesto, European integration and Public administration.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
