World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Political Science
USA
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 67 66 56 39 31 213 39570

Liesbet Hooghe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Liesbet Hooghe between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Liesbet Hooghe published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2016. 14 of the 237 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2016. 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 10 publications
1970 2025

237 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Liesbet Hooghe: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 2
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 3
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 3
1994 1
1995 3
1996 6
1997 5
1998 9
1999 6
2000 2
2001 6
2002 19
2003 5
2004 3
2005 5
2006 6
2007 9
2008 8
2009 3
2010 4
2011 2
2012 11
2013 5
2014 5
2015 4
2016 27
2017 15
2018 3
2019 12
2020 6
2021 8
2022 7
2023 6
2024 4
2025 10
Total 237
Download as CSV

Liesbet Hooghe publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liesbet Hooghe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–215 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 213 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19 213
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Liesbet Hooghe D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liesbet Hooghe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100 67
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Political Science in United States Leader Award

Overview

Liesbet Hooghe is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. The scientist's research primarily spans the social sciences, with notable focus in political science and international relations, sociology and political science, education, linguistics and language, as well as communication.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • European Union Policy and Governance
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Political Systems and Governance
  • Politics and Society in Latin America

Liesbet Hooghe has published multiple research papers, with some recent notable works listed below:

  • "Chapel Hill Expert Survey trend file, 1999-2019" (2021) in Electoral Studies
  • "Language difference and regional authority" (2020) in Regional & Federal Studies
  • "A postfunctionalist theory of multilevel governance" (2020) in The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
  • "The Russian threat and the consolidation of the West: How populism and EU-skepticism shape party support for Ukraine" (2024) in European Union Politics
  • "Contesting Covid: The ideological bases of partisan responses to the Covid-19 pandemic" (2022) in European Journal of Political Research

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several frequent coauthors:

  • Gary Marks
  • Jan Rovný
  • Marco R. Steenbergen
  • Milada Anna Vachudová
  • Ryan Bakker

Key publication venues for Liesbet Hooghe include UNC Libraries, SSRN Electronic Journal, Electoral Studies, European Union Politics, and European Journal of Political Research. Within these venues, the scientist has a consistent record of contributions focused on political science topics and governance.

Best Publications

  • Multi-Level Governance and European Integration

    Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Wolfe Marks

  • A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus

    Liesbet Hooghe;Gary W Marks

  • European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance

    Gary Marks;Liesbet Hooghe;Kermit Blank

  • Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?

    Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Marks;Carole J. Wilson

  • Types of Multi-Level Governance

    Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Marks

  • Calculation, Community and Cues Public Opinion on European Integration

    Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Marks

  • Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage

    Liesbet Hooghe;Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Marks;Gary Marks

  • Types of Multi-Level Governance

    Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Marks

  • Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999-2010

    Ryan Bakker;Catherine de Vries;Erica Edwards;Liesbet Hooghe

  • Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West Different Structure, Same Causality

    Gary Marks;Liesbet Hooghe;Moira Nelson;Erica Edwards

  • Contrasting Visions of Multi-level Governance

    E.A.E.B. Hooghe;G.W. Marks

  • The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies

    Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Wolfe Marks;Arjan H. Schakel

  • The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance

    Liesbet Hooghe

  • Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data

    Jonathan Polk;Jan Rovny;Ryan Bakker;Erica Edwards

  • Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning

    Liesbet Hooghe;Ryan Bakker;Anna Brigevich;Catherine De vries

  • Several Roads Lead to International Norms, but Few Via International Socialization: A Case Study of the European Commission

    Liesbet Hooghe

  • The Rise of Regional Authority

    Unknown

  • Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-Level Governance

    Charles Pentland;Liesbet Hooghe

  • Does identity or economic rationality drive public opinion on European integration

    Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Marks

  • The European Commission of the Twenty-First Century

    Hussein Kassim;John Peterson;Michael W. Bauer;Sara Connolly

  • Subnational mobilisation in the European union

    Liesbet Hooghe

  • The Making of a Polity: The Struggle over European Integration

    Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Marks

  • Chapel Hill Expert Survey trend file, 1999–2019

    Seth Jolly;Ryan Bakker;Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Marks

  • Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Volume I

    Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Marks;Arjan H. Schakel;Sandra Chapman Osterkatz

  • European Integration and Political Conflict: Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?

    Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Marks;Carole J. Wilson

  • Unraveling the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. IHS Political Science Series: 2003, No. 87

    Liesbet Hooghe;Gary Marks

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary Marks
Gary Marks University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Arjan H. Schakel
Arjan H. Schakel University of Bergen
Milada Anna Vachudova
Milada Anna Vachudova University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jan Rovny
Jan Rovny Sciences Po
Marco R. Steenbergen
Marco R. Steenbergen University of Zurich
Hussein Kassim
Hussein Kassim University of East Anglia
Renaud Dehousse
Renaud Dehousse Johns Hopkins University
John Peterson
John Peterson University of Edinburgh
Michael W. Bauer
Michael W. Bauer European University Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA can open doors to a wide variety of online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students choose to complement their political science education with interdisciplinary study, enhancing their skills and career opportunities. For those interested in broad academic exploration, a master's interdisciplinary studies degree can provide a customized curriculum that spans multiple fields, including public policy, law, and communication.

Students looking for specialized expertise may consider degrees that build on related areas. Pursuing a library science degree online can lead to roles in research, digital information management, and archival science, all of which deeply intersect with political history and policy.

Many political science graduates also develop interests in history. Understanding the types of history degrees available can help students find programs aligned with their academic goals, such as public history, military history, or political history. For those seeking graduate credentials, there are accessible online ma history programs that can strengthen both subject mastery and research abilities.

Best Scientists Citing Liesbet Hooghe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles