World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
23959
World Ranking
3243
National Ranking
1560

Stanley Feldman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley Feldman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 94 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Stanley Feldman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley Feldman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stanley Feldman is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research predominantly lies within the domain of Social Sciences, with specific focus on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, and Communication.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics within political and social research. Key areas include Political Philosophy and Ethics, Religion and Society Interactions, Political Conflict and Governance, Migration, Refugees, and Integration, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Racial and Ethnic Identity Research, and Cultural Differences and Values.

Stanley Feldman has contributed to several recent scholarly papers. These include:

  • "Advancing the Measurement of Authoritarianism," 2021, Political Behavior
  • "Replication Data for: Advancing the Measurement of Authoritarianism," 2021, Harvard Dataverse
  • "Political Socialization and Social Networks," 2025, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Political Socialization and Social Networks," 2025, SSRN Electronic Journal

Their frequent coauthors encompass Andrew Engelhardt, Marc J. Hetherington, Christopher Weber, Leonie Huddy, and Mikael Hjerm. These collaborations have appeared multiple times alongside Feldman's research outputs.

The venues where Stanley Feldman's research is regularly published include the SSRN Electronic Journal, Political Behavior, and Harvard Dataverse.

Best Publications

  • Multiple regression in practice

    William Dale Berry;Stanley Feldman

  • A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences

    John Zaller;Stanley Feldman

  • Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: the Role of Core Beliefs and Values

    Stanley Feldman

  • Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism

    Stanley Feldman;Karen Stenner

  • Threat, Anxiety, and Support of Antiterrorism Policies

    Leonie Huddy;Stanley Feldman;Charles Taber;Gallya Lahav

  • The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications.

    Pamela Johnston Conover;Stanley Feldman

  • The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State

    Stanley Feldman;John Zaller

  • Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism

    Stanley Feldman

  • Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity

    Stanley Feldman;Christopher Johnston

  • Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes.

    Stanley Feldman

  • Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes

    Pamela Johnston Conover;Stanley Feldman

  • How People Organize the Political World: A Schematic Model

    Pamela Johnston Conover;Stanley Feldman

  • DOES IMPROVING A FIRM'S ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RESULT IN A HIGHER STOCK PRICE?

    Stanley J. Feldman;Peter A. Soyka;Paul G. Ameer

  • Economic Self-Interest and Political Behavior

    Stanley Feldman

  • 9. On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger

    Leonie Huddy;Stanley Feldman;Erin Cassese

  • The Humanitarian Foundation of Public Support for Social Welfare

    Stanley Feldman;Marco R. Steenbergen

  • The consequences of terrorism: Disentangling the effects of personal and national threat

    Leonie Huddy;Stanley Feldman;Theresa Capelos;Colin Provost

  • Racial Resentment and White Opposition to Race‐Conscious Programs: Principles or Prejudice?

    Stanley Feldman;Leonie Huddy

  • Emotional Reactions to the Economy: I'm Mad as Hell and I'm not Going to Take it Anymore

    Pamela Johnston Conover;Stanley Feldman

  • Judging Inflation and Unemployment: The Origins of Retrospective Evaluations

    Pamela Johnston Conover;Stanley Feldman;Kathleen Knight

  • Not so simple: The multidimensional nature and diverse origins of political ideology

    Stanley Feldman;Leonie Huddy

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonie Huddy
Leonie Huddy Stony Brook University
Pamela Johnston Conover
Pamela Johnston Conover University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
William D. Berry
William D. Berry Florida State University
Lee Sigelman
Lee Sigelman George Washington University
George E. Marcus
George E. Marcus Williams College
John Zaller
John Zaller University of California, Los Angeles
Marco R. Steenbergen
Marco R. Steenbergen University of Zurich
Milton Lodge
Milton Lodge Stony Brook University
John T. Jost
John T. Jost New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities, a variety of online degree pathways are now accessible. Options like a bachelor of science in psychology open doors to foundational knowledge in human behavior, preparing graduates for roles in education, business, or further academic pursuits.

Those who wish to advance in social services might consider msw online programs. These programs value both accessibility and quality, helping students efficiently earn credentials needed for clinical or community social work.

Looking toward more specialized practice, psyd online degrees focus on practical and clinical training, ideal for individuals aiming to become licensed psychologists. Another emerging avenue is through online mft degrees, which provide targeted preparation for careers as marriage and family therapists.

These online degrees offer flexible schedules and can often be completed more quickly or affordably than traditional pathways, making it easier for working students and career-changers to pursue meaningful jobs in helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley Feldman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles