World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
New Zealand
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 88 1032 906 3 2 512 29544

Chris G. Sibley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chris G. Sibley between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chris G. Sibley published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 23.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2021. 72 of the 584 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2021. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 38 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 39 publications 2021: 47 publications 2022: 39 publications 2023: 41 publications 2024: 35 publications 2025: 37 publications
2001 2025

584 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chris G. Sibley: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 0
2003 1
2004 5
2005 2
2006 4
2007 14
2008 8
2009 14
2010 20
2011 20
2012 26
2013 37
2014 25
2015 38
2016 29
2017 35
2018 29
2019 37
2020 39
2021 47
2022 39
2023 41
2024 35
2025 37
Total 584
Download as CSV

Chris G. Sibley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris G. Sibley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 511–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 512 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26 512
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Chris G. Sibley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris G. Sibley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83 88
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in New Zealand Leader Award

Overview

Chris G. Sibley is affiliated with the University of Auckland in New Zealand. Their research output spans multiple areas within the social sciences and psychology, with a focus on social psychology and political psychology subfields. Their academic work reflects an extensive publication record and collaborations with several frequent coauthors.

Sibley's main fields of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Their specialized subfields are:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Gender Studies

The main topics covered in their research encompass:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation

Among their most cited recent papers are:

  • Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being (2020), published in American Psychologist
  • Ten-year panel data confirm generation gap but climate beliefs increase at similar rates across ages (2021), published in Nature Communications
  • The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology (2020), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • The psychological causes and societal consequences of authoritarianism (2023), published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Abortion Attitudes: An Overview of Demographic and Ideological Differences (2022), published in Political Psychology

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Danny Osborne
  • Joseph Bulbulia
  • Kumar Yogeeswaran
  • Kieren J. Lilly
  • Taciano L. Milfont

Sibley publishes regularly in the following journals:

  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • British Journal of Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • Personality and Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Review:

    Christopher Sibley;John Duckitt

  • Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: a dual-process motivational model

    John Duckitt;Christopher Sibley

  • The Contact Caveat Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice

    Fiona Kate Barlow;Stefania Paolini;Anne Pedersen;Matthew J. Hornsey

  • Reliability and Validity of the Revised Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR-R) Self-Report Measure of Adult Romantic Attachment

    Chris G. Sibley;Ronald Fischer;James H. Liu

  • Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice

    John Duckitt;Chris G. Sibley

  • A Dual-Process Motivational Model of Ideology, Politics, and Prejudice

    John Duckitt;Chris G. Sibley

  • Short-term temporal stability and factor structure of the revised experiences in close relationships (ECR-R) measure of adult attachment

    Chris G. Sibley;James H. Liu

  • The big five personality traits and environmental engagement: Associations at the individual and societal level

    Taciano L. Milfont;Chris G. Sibley

  • Teachers' explicit expectations and implicit prejudiced attitudes to educational achievement: Relations with student achievement and the ethnic achievement gap

    E.R. Peterson;C. Rubie-Davies;D. Osborne;C. Sibley

  • Right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test

    Frank Asbrock;Chris G. Sibley;John Duckitt

  • Personality and political orientation: Meta‐analysis and test of a threat‐constraint model.

    Chris G. Sibley;Danny Osborne;John Duckitt

  • Antecedents of Men’s Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: The Dual Roles of Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism

    Chris G. Sibley;Marc S. Wilson;John Duckitt

  • Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap

    Federica Durante;Susan T Fiske;Nicolas Kervyn;Amy J C Cuddy

  • Dangerous and competitive worldviews: A meta-analysis of their associations with Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism

    Ryan Perry;Chris G. Sibley;John Duckitt

  • Regulating Partners in Intimate Relationships: The Costs and Benefits of Different Communication Strategies

    Nickola C. Overall;Garth J. O. Fletcher;Jeffry A. Simpson;Chris G. Sibley

  • You're inferior and not worth our concern: the interface between empathy and social dominance orientation.

    Jim Sidanius;Nour Kteily;Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington;Arnold K Ho

  • Effects of Dangerous and Competitive Worldviews on Right‐Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation over a Five‐Month Period

    Chris G. Sibley;Marc S. Wilson;John Duckitt

  • Social connectedness improves public mental health: Investigating bidirectional relationships in the New Zealand attitudes and values survey:

    Alexander K Saeri;Tegan Cruwys;Fiona Kate Barlow;Samantha Stronge

  • Protesting to challenge or defend the system? A system justification perspective on collective action.

    Danny Osborne;John T. Jost;Julia C. Becker;Vivienne Badaan

  • Faith after an earthquake: a longitudinal study of religion and perceived health before and after the 2011 Christchurch New Zealand Earthquake

    Chris G. Sibley;Joseph Bulbulia

  • A teacher expectation intervention: Modelling the practices of high expectation teachers

    Christine M. Rubie-Davies;Elizabeth R. Peterson;Chris G. Sibley;Robert Rosenthal

Frequent Co-Authors

Danny Osborne
Danny Osborne University of Auckland
Fiona Kate Barlow
Fiona Kate Barlow University of Queensland
Joseph Bulbulia
Joseph Bulbulia Victoria University of Wellington
John Duckitt
John Duckitt University of Auckland
James H. Liu
James H. Liu Massey University
Marc S. Wilson
Marc S. Wilson Victoria University of Wellington
Taciano L. Milfont
Taciano L. Milfont University of Waikato
Nickola C. Overall
Nickola C. Overall University of Auckland
Kumar Yogeeswaran
Kumar Yogeeswaran University of Canterbury
Matthew J. Hornsey
Matthew J. Hornsey University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in psychology can open the door to various rewarding careers, including becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). With the growing demand for mental health professionals, graduating with a psychology background—especially one that meets BCBA requirements—can lead to impactful roles in education, healthcare, and private practice.

The path to becoming a BCBA typically involves a combination of a relevant graduate degree, specific coursework, supervised experience, and passing the national certification exam. However, requirements may differ slightly by location. If you’re interested in pursuing this career in Georgia, be sure to check the Atlanta bcba education requirements. For those in Colorado, review the how to become a bcba in Aurora guide, while candidates in Texas and California should consult the Austin bcba education requirements and Bakersfield bcba requirements, respectively.

Online psychology degrees often offer the flexibility needed to balance coursework with the required fieldwork, making them a practical choice for busy students or working professionals. By understanding the certification process and local requirements, you can strategically plan your studies and take the next step toward a fulfilling career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Chris G. Sibley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles