World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9092 8494 4822 4389 110 7665

Nour Kteily publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nour Kteily between 2011 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nour Kteily published across 16 years, from 2011 to 2026, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2025. 21 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2025. 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 2 publications
2011 2026

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nour Kteily: publications per year, 2011 to 2026
Year Publications
2011 4
2012 3
2013 4
2014 10
2015 8
2016 18
2017 12
2018 13
2019 8
2020 14
2021 6
2022 12
2023 7
2024 12
2025 19
2026 2
Total 152
Download as CSV

Nour Kteily publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nour Kteily sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 110
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nour Kteily D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nour Kteily sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nour Kteily is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the Social Sciences, with a focus on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Gender Studies, and Safety Research.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality

Frequent publication venues for Kteily include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Selected recent papers by Nour Kteily feature a range of topics and venues:

  • Intergroup Contact Reduces Dehumanization and Meta-Dehumanization: Cross-Sectional, Longitudinal, and Quasi-Experimental Evidence From 16 Samples in Five Countries (2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)
  • Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality (2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity (2024, Science)
  • The role of group-based egalitarianism in collective action (2020, Current Opinion in Psychology)
  • Blatant dehumanization in the mind's eye: Prevalent even among those who explicitly reject it? (2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General)

Their frequent coauthors include Arnold K. Ho, Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington, Kurt Gray, Frank Kachanoff, and Emile Bruneau.

Best Publications

  • The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.

    Arnold K. Ho;Jim Sidanius;Nour Sami Kteily;Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington

  • The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization.

    Nour S. Kteily;Emile Bruneau;Adam Waytz;Sarah Cotterill

  • Social Dominance Orientation Revisiting the Structure and Function of a Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes

    Arnold K. Ho;Jim Sidanius;Felicia Pratto;Shana Levin

  • They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization.

    Nour Kteily;Gordon Hodson;Emile Bruneau

  • Diversity policy, social dominance, and intergroup relations: predicting prejudice in changing social and political contexts.

    Serge Guimond;Richard J Crisp;Pierre De Oliveira;Rodolphe Kamiejski

  • Backlash: The Politics and Real-World Consequences of Minority Group Dehumanization

    Nour Kteily;Emile Bruneau

  • You're inferior and not worth our concern: the interface between empathy and social dominance orientation.

    Jim Sidanius;Nour Kteily;Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington;Arnold K Ho

  • Social Dominance Theory: Explorations in the Psychology of Oppression

    Jim Sidanius;Sarah Cotterill;Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington;Nour Kteily

  • Assimilation, multiculturalism, and colorblindness: Mediated and moderated relationships between social dominance orientation and prejudice

    Shana Levin;Miriam Matthews;Serge Guimond;James Sidanius

  • Social dominance orientation: Cause or 'mere effect'? Evidence for SDO as a causal predictor of prejudice and discrimination against ethnic and racial outgroups

    Nour S. Kteily;James Sidanius;Shana Levin

  • Darker Demons of Our Nature: The Need to (Re)Focus Attention on Blatant Forms of Dehumanization

    Nour Sami Kteily;Emile Bruneau

  • A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right:

    Patrick S. Forscher;Nour S. Kteily

  • Living under threat: Mutual threat perception drives anti-Muslim and anti-Western hostility in the age of terrorism

    Milan Obaidi;Jonas R. Kunst;Nour Kteily;Lotte Thomsen

  • Hierarchy in the eye of the beholder: (Anti-)egalitarianism shapes perceived levels of social inequality.

    Nour S. Kteily;Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington;Arnold K. Ho

  • The enemy as animal: Symmetric dehumanization during asymmetric warfare.

    Emile Bruneau;Nour Sami Kteily

  • Hierarchy in the mind: The predictive power of social dominance orientation across social contexts and domains

    Nour Kteily;Arnold K. Ho;Jim Sidanius

  • The unique effects of blatant dehumanization on attitudes and behavior towards Muslim refugees during the European ‘refugee crisis’ across four countries

    Emile Bruneau;Nour Sami Kteily;Lasse Laustsen

  • “You’re one of us”:: Black Americans’ use of hypodescent and its association with egalitarianism.

    Arnold K. Ho;Nour S. Kteily;Jacqueline M. Chen

  • Denying humanity: The distinct neural correlates of blatant dehumanization.

    Emile Bruneau;Nir Jacoby;Nour Kteily;Rebecca Saxe

  • Negotiating power: agenda ordering and the willingness to negotiate in asymmetric intergroup conflicts.

    Nour S. Kteily;Tamar Saguy;James Sidanius;Donald M. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Jim Sidanius
Jim Sidanius Harvard University
Felicia Pratto
Felicia Pratto University of Connecticut
Adam Waytz
Adam Waytz Northwestern University
Shana Levin
Shana Levin Claremont McKenna College
Jonas R. Kunst
Jonas R. Kunst BI Norwegian Business School
Gordon Hodson
Gordon Hodson Brock University
Tamar Saguy
Tamar Saguy Reichman University
Vincent Yzerbyt
Vincent Yzerbyt Université Catholique de Louvain
Donald M. Taylor
Donald M. Taylor McGill University
Chris G. Sibley
Chris G. Sibley University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Psychology opens doors to diverse related fields, with Social Work being one of the most popular options for students interested in making a difference. Many universities now offer flexible online programs that can help you start or advance in this rewarding field.

If you are considering studying from Texas, you may want to explore the best online social work degree programs in Texas for accredited, reputable options. Students looking for a broader overview of nationally recognized choices can review the top online social work degrees in America.

Those living in specific regions, such as Waco, can find tailored guidance by checking out the top online social work programs in Waco. Similarly, prospective students in the Southeast can benefit from programs selected among the best social work programs in Alabama.

Whether you aim to practice counseling, advocacy, or research, online degrees in Social Work and Psychology provide flexible pathways to fulfill your passion for helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Nour Kteily

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles